Abstract
Existing models of damage accumulation under cyclic loading and software for the stress–strain state analysis makes it possible to calculate the damage distribution per structure volume. Knowledge of this distribution makes it possible to appropriately choose a repair technology or substantiate the need for complete replacement of a structure. Analysis of two different large-scale structures is used to illustrate this procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Makhutov, N.A., Konstruktsionnaya prochnost’, resurs i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost’. Chast’ 1. Kriterii prochnosti i resursa (Structure Strength, Lifetime and Anthropogenic Safety, Part 1: Strength and Lifetime Criteria), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005).
Castiglioni, C.A. and Pucinotti, R., Failure criteria and cumulative damage models for steel components under cyclic loading, J. Construct. Steel Res., 2009, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 751–765.
Lee, Y.-L., Barkey, M.E., and Kang, H.-T., Metal Fatigue Analysis Handbook, Elsevier, 2011).
PNAE G-7-002-86: Strength Calculation Norms for Equipment and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Plants, Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1989).
Sinitsyn, E.N., Strength calculating software for oil and gas complex equipment and pipelines, Khim. Neftegaz. Mashinostr., 2001, no. 9, pp. 32–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.O. Chernyavsky, 2016, published in Problemy Mashinostroeniya i Nadezhnosti Mashin, 2016, No. 2, pp. 86–91.
The article was translated by the author.
About this article
Cite this article
Chernyavsky, A.O. Repair planning by calculating the damage distribution. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab. 45, 168–172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1052618816020047
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1052618816020047