Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Effect of Temperature Difference on Gravimetric Measurements When Changing the Observation Point

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transient processes in gravimetric data spanning more than 12 years are considered. During this time, more than 15 trips were made from the fundamental gravimetric point Ledovo to the first class point Zapolskoe and back using two CG 5 Autograv automated relative gravimeters. The most significant parameters that affect the readings of the instruments were identified: ambient temperature, the values of the zero drift of the sensing element of the gravimeter, and the direct increment of gravity. The zero drift was taken into account using a second-order polynomial prediction, and the remaining two parameters were described by a logarithmic dependence. The natural logarithm equation allows describing the functions by measuring the coefficient before the logarithm (logarithmic) and additional (linear). The value of the logarithmic coefficients characterizing the duration of transient processes has a linear dependence on temperature, which means that it can characterize the measurement time at the point in the case of a significant temperature change. The magnitude of the linear coefficients characterizing the increase in gravity depends linearly on temperature when the instruments are moved to a colder environment. When the instruments are moved to a warmer environment (10°), the dependence becomes more complex, possibly random, which also requires an increase in the measurement time at the point. The usual duration of measurements at gravimetric stations is 10 min. The relevance of taking temperature into account at measurement points depends on the required accuracy, for example, for a temperature difference of 10°C, the RMS of gravimetric measurements was ±0.025 mGal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Abramov, D.V., Dorozhkov, V.V., and Koneshov, V.N., Key elements of construction and exploitation of a land-based seismic-gravimetric complex, Seism. Instrum., 2011, vol. 47, p. 253.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923911030029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramov, D.V., Drobyshev, M.N., and Koneshov, V.N., Specifying the values of delta factor for the Dolgoe Ledovo permanent gravity station, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2013, vol. 49, pp. 80–82.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351313010011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abramov, D.V., Drobyshev, N.V., and Malysheva, D.A., Evaluation of the effect of ambient temperature on the high-precision measurements by the GC-6 Autograv gravimeter, Geofiz. Issled., 2022, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 20–29.  https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2022.1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adushkin, V.V., Loktev, D.N., and Spivak, A.A., The effect of baric disturbances in the atmosphere on microseismic processes in the crust, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2008, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 510–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grushinskii, N.P. and Sazhina, N.B., Gravitatsionnaya razvedka (Gravitational Exploration), Moscow: Nedra, 1988.

  6. Drobyshev, M.N., Studying changes in the angular position of a gravimetric pedestal using a system of geophysical instruments, Seism. Instrum., 2015, vol. 51, pp. 94–98.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923915010077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsaka, B., Comparison of different polynomial degrees for correcting the instrumental drift of Scintrex CG-5 Autograv gravimeter, Austr. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2020, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 19–25.  https://doi.org/10.22587/ajbas.2020.14.5.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krivitskii, G.E., Andreev, O.P., Kobylkin, D.N., Akhmedsafin, S.K., Kirsanov, S.A., and Bezmaternykh, E.F., Gravimetricheskii kontrol’ razrabotki gazovykh i gazokondensatnykh mestorozhdenii (Gravimetric Inspection of Development of Gas and Gas-Condensate Deposits), Moscow: Nedra, 2012.

  9. Loran, P.Zh., Approksimatsiya i optimizatsiya (Approximation and Optimization), Moscow: Mir, 1975.

  10. Otnositel’nyi gravimetr CG-5. Sistema Scintrex Autograv: Rukovodstvo po ekspluatatsii (Relative Gravimeter CG-5: Scintrex Autograv System: User’s Guide), 2008, 4th ed.

  11. Seigel, H.O., A Guide to High Precision Land Gravimeter Surveys, Concord, Ontario: Scintrex Ltd., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out within the state task of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, and with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-05-00524).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. N. Drobyshev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drobyshev, M.N., Abramov, D.V., Koneshov, V.N. et al. Assessment of the Effect of Temperature Difference on Gravimetric Measurements When Changing the Observation Point. Seism. Instr. 58, 534–539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923922050061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923922050061

Keywords:

Navigation