Skip to main content
Log in

Towards global seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions using waveform cross correlation. Part II: Synthetic master events

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waveform cross correlation is an efficient tool for detection and characterization of seismic signals. For the purposes of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, cross correlation can globally reduce the threshold of detection by 0.3 to 0.4 magnitude units. However, the technique critically depends on the availability of master events. In Part I of this paper, we have demonstrated that in seismically active regions the best master events (grand-masters) replicated over a regular grid allow improving the efficiency of signal detection and event finding. In aseismic areas, there are two approaches to populate the global grid of master events for the International Monitoring System: the replication of grand-masters and calculation of synthetic seismograms for master-events in the global grid nodes. The efficiency of synthetic templates depends on the accuracy of shape and amplitude predictions controlled by focal depth and mechanism, source function, velocity structure and attenuation along the master/station path. Here we test three focal mechanisms (explosion, thrust fault, and actual Harvard CMT solution for one of the April 11, 2012 Sumatra aftershocks) and two velocity structures (ak135 and CRUST 2.0). Sixteen synthetic master events were distributed over a 1° × 1° grid covering the zone of aftershocks. We built five cross correlation standard event lists (XSEL) and compared detections and events with those built using the real and grand master events as well as with the Reviewed Events Bulletin of the International Data Centre. The XSELs were built using an explosion source and ak135 and the reverse fault with isotropic radiation pattern to demonstrate the performance similar to that of the real and grand masters. Here we have proved quantitatively that it is possible to cover all aseismic areas with synthetic masters without significant loss in seismic monitoring capabilities based on cross correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, New York: Freeman, 2002, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrov, D.I., Kitov, I.O., Rozhkov, M.V., and Friberg, P., Towards global seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions using waveform cross correlation. Part I: Grand master events, Seism. Instrum., 2016, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrov, D., Khukhuudei, U., Kitov, I., Sitnikov, K., and Zerbo, L., Automated recovery of the 2012 Sumatera aftershock sequence using waveform cross correlation, J. Earth Sci. Eng., 2013, vol. 3, pp. 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrov, D., Kitov, I., and Zerbo, L., Perspectives of crosscorrelation in seismic monitoring at the In-ternational Data Centre, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2014, vol. 171, nos. 3–5, pp. 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, E.W., A quantitative evaluation of teleseismic explosion records, Proc. R. Soc., London Ser. A., 1966, vol. 290, pp. 396–407. Computer Programs in Seismology—Tutorials. http://wwweassluedu/eqc/eqc_cps/TUTORIAL/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J., Bobrov, D., Bormann, P., Duran, E., Grenard, P., Haralabus, G., Kitov, I., and Starovoit, Yu., CTBTO: Goals, networks, data analysis and data availability, in New Manual of Seismological Practice Observatory, Bormann, P., Ed., 2012, Ch. 15. doi doi 10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_ch15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger D. TDMT_INV: Time Domain Seismic Moment Tensor INVersion, in vol. 81B of International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Lee, W.H.K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P.C., and Kisslinger, C., Eds., Academic Press, 2003, p. 1627. doi 10.1016/S0074-6142(03)80290-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, S.J. and Ringdal, F., The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based wave-form correlation, Geophys. J. Int., 2006, vol. 165, pp. 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, S.J. and Ringdal, F., Seismic monitoring of the North Korea Nuclear Test Site using a multi-channel correlation detector, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2012, vol. 50, pp. 1897–1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D., Subspace Detectors: Theory (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Internal Report UCRL-TR-222758), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. and Dodge, D., An autonomous system of grouping events in a developing aftershock sequence, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2011, vol. 101, pp. 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. and Paik, T., Subspace Detectors: Efficient Implementation (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Report UCRL-TR-223177), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, N.A., Radiation pattern of surface waves from point sources in a multi-layered medium, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1964, vol. 54, pp. 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R.B., Computer programs in seismology: An evolving tool for instruction and research, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2013, vol. 84, pp. 1081–1088. doi 10.1785/0220110096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J.A., A Quantitative evaluation of seismic signals at teleseismic distances–I. Radiation from point sources, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1969a, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J.A., A Quantitative evaluation of seismic signals at teleseismic distances–II: Body waves and surface waves from an extended source, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1969b, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kværna, T., Ringdal, F., and Baadshaug, U., North Korea’s Nuclear Test: The capability for seismic monitoring of the North Korean Test Site, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2007, vol. 75, pp. 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, A., Harris, D., and Pasyanos, M., A model-based signal processing approach to seismic monitoring, in Proceedings of 28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies: Orlando, FL, 2006, pp. 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozhkov, M., Bobrov, D., and Kitov, I., Synthetics vs. real waveforms from underground nuclear explosions as master templates for CTBT monitoring with cross-correlation, in 2013 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, CA, 2013, Abstract S21B-2403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, D., Kim, W.-Y., and Richards, P.G., Seismological constraints on proposed low-yield nuclear testing in particular regions and time periods in the past, with comments on “Radionuclide evidence for low-yield nuclear testing in North Korea in April/May 2010” by Lars-Erik De Geer, Sci. Global Secur., 2012, vol. 20, pp. 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. I. Bobrov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.I. Bobrov, I.O. Kitov, M.V. Rozhkov, P. Friberg, 2015, published in Seismicheskie Pribory, 2015, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 22–46.

The article was translated by the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bobrov, D.I., Kitov, I.O., Rozhkov, M.V. et al. Towards global seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions using waveform cross correlation. Part II: Synthetic master events. Seism. Instr. 52, 207–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923916030038

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923916030038

Keywords

Navigation