Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of nonlinear detectors in spatial multiplexing for spatially correlated channels

  • Published:
Radioelectronics and Communications Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial multiplexing is used in multiple input multiple output (MIMO) wireless systems to increase the data rate. Some nonlinear detectors, such as minimum mean square error (MMSE) Vertical Bell laboratories layered space-time (VBLAST), Maximum A-Posteriori (MMSE VBLAST MAP), and MMSE Improved VBLAST detectors are used in place of a over more complex detector, such as maximum likelihood detector or singular value decomposition based detector. We have presented simulation results of MIMO symbol error rate versus average SNR for MMSE VBLAST MAP and MMSE Improved VBLAST schemes assuming spatially correlated channels for M-ary QAM. We have observed that the performance of MMSE VBLAST MAP and MMSE Improved VBLAST detectors is almost identical in spatially uncorrelated channels. However, in the case of spatially correlated channels, MMSE Improved VBLAST outperforms MMSE VBLAST MAP. We have also seen that complexity of the Improved VBLAST algorithm is higher than the complexity of VBLAST MAP algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. J. Foschini, “Layered space time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas,” Bell Labs Technical Journal 1, No. 2, 41 (Autumn 1996). DOI: 10.1002/bltj.2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. Foschini and M. J. Gans, “On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Personal Communications 6, No. 3, 311 (1998). DOI: 10.1023/A:1008889222784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. B. Kreyndelin and L. A. Varukina, “A method of modulating signals with space-time encoding using non-linear iteration algorithm,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst. 52, No. 8, 413 (2009). DOI: 10.3103/ S0735272709080032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Agrell, E. Eriksson, A. Vardy, and K. Zeger, “Closest point search in lattices,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48, No. 8, 2201 (Aug. 2002). DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2002.800499.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhan Guo and Peter Nilsson, “Reduced complexity Schnorr-Euchner decoding algorithms for MIMO systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. 8, No. 5, 286 (May 2004). DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2004.827376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vipul Gupta, Abhay Kumar Sah, and A. K. Chaturvedi, “Approximate matrix inversion based low complexity sphere decoding in MIMO systems,” arXiv: 1509.02405v1 [cs.IT] (8 Sept. 2015).

  7. M. Kanthimathi, R. Amutha, “Reduced complexity maximum likelihood detection for DAPSK based relay communication systems,” Proc. of 2015 Int. Conf. on Computing and Communications Technologies, ICCCT, 8 Oct. 2015, Chennai, India (IEEE, 2015), pp. 292–295. DOI: 10.1109/ICCCT2.2015.7292763.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yi-Jun Zhu, Wen-Ya Wang, Jian-Kang Zhang, Yan-Yu Zhang, “Constellation collaborated non-linear orthogonal space-time block codes with fast maximum-likelihood detection,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 66 No. 1, 513 (2017). DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2016.2536060.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yin Chen and Xu Guang Huang, “A linewidth-tolerant two-stage CPE using a new QPSK-partitioning approach and an enhanced maximum likelihood detection for 64-QAM coherent optical systems,” J. Lightwave Technology 33, No. 18, 3883 (2015). DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2015.2448113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nir Regev, IIia Iofedov, and Dov Wulich, “Maximum likelihood detection of nonlinearly distorted OFDM signal,” Proc. of 2015 IEEE Global Communication Conf., GLOBECOM, 6-10 Dec. 2015, San Diego, CA, USA (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2015.7417009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. W. Wolniansky, G. J. Foschini, G. D. Golden, and R. A. Valenzuela, “V-BLAST: An architecture for realizing very high data rates over the rich-scattering wireless channel,” Proc. of Int. Symp. on Signal, System and Electronics (1998), pp. 295–300. DOI: 10.1109/ISSSE.1998.738086.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Alimohammad, S. F. Fard, and B. F. Cockburn, “Improved layered MIMO detection algorithm with near-optimal performance,” Electron. Lett. 45, No. 13, 675 (2009). DOI: 10.1049/el.2009.0373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yavuz Yapici, “A new symbol detection algorithm for MIMO channels,” A thesis submitted to the department of electrical and electronics engineering and the institute of engineering and science of Bilkent university (Jan. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dimitry Chizhik, Farrokh Rashid Farrokhi, Jonathan Ling, and Angel Lozano, “Effect of antenna separation on the capacity of BLAST in correlated channels,” IEEE Commun. Lett. 4, No. 11, 337 (Nov. 2000). DOI: 10.1109/ 4234.892194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sergey L. Loyka, “Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the exponential correlation matrix,” IEEE Commun. Lett. 5, No. 9, 369 (Sept. 2001). DOI: 10.1109/4234.951380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Chauhan.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D. Chauhan, J. Bhalani, 2017, published in Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Radioelektronika, 2017, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 383–391.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chauhan, D., Bhalani, J. Performance of nonlinear detectors in spatial multiplexing for spatially correlated channels. Radioelectron.Commun.Syst. 60, 297–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272717070020

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272717070020

Navigation