Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Polyinterval Alternatives: Collective Risk Estimation

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

Procedures for calculating preference and risk indicators that were previously applied to mono interval objects are proposed within the collective-risk estimating method in the case of pairwise comparison for polyinterval objects, generalized interval, and fuzzy objects. The procedures are based on the defuzzification of interval estimates of preference and risk indicators related to mono intervals at alpha-levels in the case of fuzzy polyinterval objects and on the presentation of generalized interval estimates as a probabilistic mixture of the distributions forming such an estimate. Some differences and relationships in approach of generalized interval estimations and fuzzy approach for comparing alternatives are studied. It is established that generalized uniform distributions of probability in the approach of generalized interval estimates are obtained if we use the defuzzification methods for uniform distributions on alpha levels of fuzzy objects discussed in the paper. The manner is shown in which the defuzzification procedures lead to one-numeric estimates for the interval characteristics of fuzzy objects, similar to the numerical characteristics of distribution functions of probability theory, mathematical expectation, variance, and mean semideviation. Depending on the defuzzification method, different probability distributions in the formalism of generalized interval estimates can be obtained from uniform distributions on alpha-levels of fuzzy objects. However, the entire variety of probability distributions that arise in the last formalism is not exhausted by the distributions obtained in this manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Orlovsky, S.A., Problemy prinyatiya reshenii pri nechetkoi iskhodnoi informatsii (Decision Making Problems with Fuzzy Source Information), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

  2. Chugunov, N., Shepelyov, G., and Sternin, M., The generalized interval estimations in decision making under uncertainty, Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage., 2008, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 298–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sternin, M.Yu. and Shepelev, G.I., Generalized interval expert estimates in decision making, Dokl. Math., 2010, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 485–486.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P.C., Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns, Am. Econ. Rev., 1977, vol. 67, pp. 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ogryczak, W. and Ruszczyński, A., From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1999, vol. 116, pp. 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Podinovskii, V.V., Numerical risk measures as selection criteria for probabilistic uncertainty, Iskusstv. Intell. Prinyatie Reshenii, 2015, no. 2, pp. 60–74.

  7. Shepelev, G.I., Comparing poly-interval alternatives: The “mean-risk” method, Iskusstv. Intell. Prinyatie Reshenii, 2019, no. 1, pp. 16–26.

  8. Shepelev, G., Decision-making in groups of interval alternatives, Inf. Theor. Appl., 2016, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shepelev, G.I. and Zhiyanov, V.I., A comprehensive method for comparing interval alternatives under risk, Vestn. Tsentr. Ekon.-Mat. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2018, no. 3. http://cemi.jes.su/s111111110000061-0-1. Accessed January 15, 2019. https://doi.org/10.33276/S0000061-0-1

  10. Sternin, M.Yu. and Shepelev, G.I., Risk estimation in a set of interval alternatives, Iskusstv. Intell. Prinyatie Reshenii, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diligenskii, N.V., Dymova, L.G., and Sevast’yanov, P.V., Nechetkoe modelirovanie i mnogokriterialnaya optimizatsiya proizvodstvennykh system v usloviyakh neopredelennosti: Tekhnologiya, ekonomika, ekologiya (Fuzzy Modeling and Multi-Criteria Optimization of Production Systems under Uncertainty: Technology, Economy, and Ecology), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2004.

  12. Shepelyov, G. and Sternin, M., Methods for comparison of alternatives described by interval estimations, Int. J. Bus. Continuity Risk Manage., 2011, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D. and Prade, H., Theorie des possibilities, Paris: Masson, 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Nedosekin, A.O., Nechetko-mnozhestvennyi analis riska finansovykh investitsi (Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Finance Investments), St. Petersburg, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sternin, M.Yu., Shepelev, G.I., and Shepelev, N.G., Properties of the generalized uniform probability distribution, Trudy 2-oi Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Sistemny analiz i informatsionnye tekhnologii” (Proc. 2nd International Conference System Analysis and Information Technologies (SAIT-2007)), Moscow, 2007, pp. 239–242.

  16. Sternin, M.Yu. and Shepelev, G.I., The adequacy of point criteria during the evaluation and comparison of interval alternatives problems, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shakhnov, I.F., Express analysis of ordering of interval values, Avtom. Telemekh., 2004, vol. 10, pp. 67–84.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Orlov, A.I., Nechislovaya statistika (Non-Numeric Statistics), Moscow: MZ-Press, 2004.

  19. Poroskun, V.I., Sternin, G.I., and Shepelev, G.I., DSS for evaluating oil and gas objects on early stages of prospecting, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 1998, vol. 3, pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 16-29-12864, 17-07-00512, 17-29-07021, 18-07-00280, 19-29-01047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. I. Shepelev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shepelev, G.I. Comparing Polyinterval Alternatives: Collective Risk Estimation. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 47, 284–289 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220050068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220050068

Keywords:

Navigation