Skip to main content
Log in

The role of unique identifiers in bibliographic information systems

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

To date, there is no unique accepted and standardized method for identifying journal articles, authors, and other elements of bibliographic metadata, although in recent years a considerable number of identifiers have been developed. The problem of identification becomes particularly urgent when the same information is used in different scientometric and bibliographic databases, when it is necessary to carry out complex data processing with their further integration. The need for unique identifiers outside of a system is a universal requirement. Initiatives to construct identifiers and systems appear regularly in the scientific press; however, they have not achieved the necessary degree of interoperability. This paper presents the general problems that are associated with metadata identifiers of scientific publications, analyzes a number of the existing systems and technologies, and indicates the current initiatives to remove the gap in the area of identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paskin, N., Information identifiers, Learn. Publ., 1997, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao, L., Tang, J., Li, J., A unified approach to researcher profiling, Proceedings of the ieee/wic/acm International Conference on Web Intelligence, 2007, pp. 359–365.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdushnyi, A.N., Kulagin, M.V., Serebryakov, V.A., et al., Suggestions on metadata sets for scientific information resources, Vych. Tekhnol., 2005, vol. 10 (S1), pp. 29–48.

  4. Jörg, B., Höllrigl, T., Sicilia, M.-A., Entities and identities in research information systems. E-infrastructures for research and innovation, Linking Information Systems to Improve Scientific Knowledge Production: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (June 6–9, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic), pp. 185–194.

  5. Jörg, B., Ruiz-Rube, I., Sicilia, M-A., Dvorak, J., Jeffery, K., Höllrigl, T., Rasmussen, H.S., Engfer, A., Vestdam, T., Garcia Barriocanal, E. Connecting closed world research information systems through the linked open data web, Int. J. of Software Eng. and Know. Eng., 2012, vol. 22(3), pp. 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Digital Object Identifier. http://dx.doi.org. Cited June 2, 2014.

  7. Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N., Problems of metadata identification scientometric Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and RSCI databases by the example of author, Biblioteki i informatsionnye resursy v sovremennom mire nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya i biznesa: 19-ya mezhdynar. konf. “Krym 2012” (Sudak, 2012): Trudy konf. (Libraries and Information Resources in the Modern World of Science, Culture, Education, and Business: the 19-th International Conference “Crimea 2012” (Sudak, 2012): Proceedings of the Conference, Moscow: Izd. GPNTB Rossii, 2012, pp. 1–4. http://www.gpntb.ru/win/inter-events/crimea2012/disk/124.pdf. Cited June 2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N., Identification of bibliographic metadata of scientific publications in different databases: problems and decisions, Materialy 8-oi Mezhdunar. Konf., posvyashch. 60-letiyu VINITI RAN “Aktual’nye problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya nauki, analiticheskoi i innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti, NTI-2012” Materials of the 8th International Conference Devoted to the 60th Anniversary of the VINITI RAS “Current Problems of Information Support for Scientific, Analytical and Innovative Activities, NTI-2012”), Moscow, 2012, pp. 123–124. URL: http://www.viniti.ru/download/russian/prog8.pdf. Cited June 2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N., New methods of forming a publication profile of a scholarly institution in scientific network, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2013, no. 12, pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shibboleth. http://shibboleth.internet2.edu. Cited June 2, 2014.

  11. Enserink, M. Are you ready to become a number? Science, 2009, vol. 323(5922), pp. 1662–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ResearcherID. http://www.reseacherid.com. Cited June 2, 2014.

  13. ORCID. http://www.orcid.org. Cited June 2, 2014.

  14. CrossRef: A Short History, 2009. http://www.cross-ref.org/08downloads/CrossRef10Years.pdf. Cited June 2, 2014.

  15. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T. Linked data — the story so far, Int. J. Sem. Web Inf. Syst., 2009, vol. 5(3), pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. OpenID Foundation. http://openid.net/foundation. Cited June 2, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Mazov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.A. Mazov, V.N. Gureev, 2014, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2014, No. 9, pp. 32–37.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N. The role of unique identifiers in bibliographic information systems. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 41, 206–210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214030101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214030101

Keywords

Navigation