Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of pesticide migration in soils: The role of experimental soil control

  • Ecology
  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

Optimal solutions found with mathematical models on agricultural chemical application depend on the interrelated complexity of the model and the required accuracy: the larger the number of complexly determined parameters, the more difficult the model. As a result, the calculation accuracy decreases. This problem should be solved with understanding of the physical aspects of the main soil processes of pesticide transport, experimental determination of their parameters, and adjustment of models in parallel with a substantiated reduction in their complexity. Experimental study of the physical processes with the PEARL 4.4.4 model and analysis of its sensitivity to the input parameters has shown which characteristics of experimental control are the most significant for water and pesticide migration. A filtration experiment with KCl made it possible to determine the dispersivity length and the filtration coefficient. As a result, a description of pesticide migration with fast water flows was introduced into the equation and the prediction accuracy increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorbatov, V.S., Kolupaeva, V.N., Filenko, O.F., et al., Metody otsenkiekologicheskoi opasnosti pestitsidov pri ikh registratsii (Rukovodstvo po klassifikatsii ekologicheskoi opasnosti pestitsidov) (The Way to Estimate Ecological Danger of Pesticides under Their Registration. Manual on Pesticides Ecological Danger Classification), Bol’shie Vyazemy, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kokoreva, A.A., Umarova, A.B., and Gorbatov, V.S., The way to estimate sensibility of models for matters migration in different level soils according to lysimetric flow, Vestn. Orenb. Gos. Univ., 2007, no.3.

  3. Skvortsova, E.B., Gerke, K.M., Korost, D.V., and Abrosimov, K.N., Porous space structure in podzolic layers of sod-podzol soils (2D-and 3D images analysis), Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2013, no.71.

  4. Smetnik, A.A., Spiridonov, Yu.Ya., and Shein, E.V., Migratsiya pestitsidov v pochvakh (Pesticides Migration in Soils), Moscow, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teorii i metody fiziki pochv (Soil Physics: Theory and Methods), Shein, E.V. and Karapachevskii, L.O., Eds., Moscow, 2007.

  6. Umarova, A.B., Preimushchestvennye potoki vlagi v pochvakh: zakonomernosti formirovaniya i znachenie v funktsionirovanii pochv (The Main Water Flows in Soils: Formation Regularities and Mean in Soils Functioning)), Moscow, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shein, E.V., Physically based mathematical models in soil science: history, current state, problems, and outlook (analytical review), Eurasian Soil Sci., 2015, vol. 48, no. 7, p.712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shein, E.V., Kokoreva, A.A., Gorbatov, V.S., et al., Sensitivity assessment, adjustment, and comparison of mathematical models describing the migration of pesticides in soil using lysimetric data, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2009, vol. 42, no. 7, p.769.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boesten, J.J.T.I., Influence of dispersion length on leaching calculated with PEARL, PELMO and PRZM for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, Pesticide Manage. Sci., 2004, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 971–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cyantraniliprole, EFSA J., 2014, vol. 12, no.9.

  11. Dubus, I., Brown, C., and Beulke, S., Sensitivity analysis for four pesticide leaching models, Pesticide Manage. Sci., 2003, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 962–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FOCUS. Generic Guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS Ground Water Assessments, 2014.

  13. FOCUS. Leaching Models and EU Registration, European Commission Document, 1995, no. 4952/VI.

  14. van Genuchten, M.Th., CFITIM Model: Estimates Parameters in Several Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Transport Models from Solute Breakthrough Curves, Riverside, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Genuchten, M.Th., Leij, F.J., and Yates, S.R., The RETC Code for Quantifying the Hydraulic Functions of Unsaturated Soils, Riverside: US Salinity Lab., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvis, N.J., Brown, C.D., and Granitza, E., Sources of error in model predictions of pesticide leaching: a case study using the MACRO model, Agric. Water Manag., 2000, vol. 44, no. 1–3, pp. 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katagi, T., Soil column leaching of pesticides, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2013, vol. 221, pp. 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kördel, W. and Klein, M., Prediction of leaching and groundwater contamination by pesticides, Pure Appl. Chem., 2006, vol. 78, no.5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Merdun, H. and Quisenberry, V.L., Evaluation of MACRO model by short-term water and solute transport simulation in Maury silt loam soil, Plant, Soil Environ., 2005, vol. 51, no.3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Modelling of Environmental Chemical Exposure and Risk, J.B.H.J. Linders, Ed., Wageningen, 2001.

  21. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Leaching in Soil Colums, Paris, 2004.

  22. Prado, H.A., Luiz, A.J.B., and Filho, H.C., Computational methods for agricultural research: advances and applications, Hershey: Inf. Sci. Ref., 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. PSD Pesticide Data Requirement Handbook, London, 2005.

  24. Scorza, R.P.J. and Silva, P., Sensibility analysis of the pearl model for pesticide leaching in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, Rev. Eng. Agric., 2011, vol. 31, no.5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scorza, R.P.J. and Boesten, J.J.T.I., Simulation of pesticide leaching in a cracking clay soil with the PEARL mode, Pesticide Manage. Sci., 2003, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 432–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tiktak, A., Hendriks, R.F.A., and Boesten, J.J.T.I., Simulation of movement of pesticides towards drains with a preferential flow version of PEARL, Pesticide Manage. Sci., 2011, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiktak, A., van den Berg, F., Boesten, J.J.T.I., et al., Manual of FOCUS PEARL Version 1.1.1, Wageningen, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Shein.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Shein, A.A. Belik, A.A. Kokoreva, V.N. Kolupaeva, P.A. Pletenev, 2017, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 17: Pochvovedenie, 2017, No. 4, pp. 45–51.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shein, E.V., Belik, A.A., Kokoreva, A.A. et al. Prediction of pesticide migration in soils: The role of experimental soil control. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 72, 185–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687417040044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687417040044

Keywords

Navigation