Skip to main content
Log in

Biotic Interactions between Two Species of Microalgae in Mixed Culture

  • Hydrobiology
  • Published:
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biotic interactions in a mixed culture of two microalgae species—Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Breb. and Monoraphidium arcuatum (Korsch.) Hind.—used in bioassay in monocultures as test objects were studied. The toxic effect of cell-free filtrates from different “age” monoculture (2, 7, 10, 15, 21, and 28 days) of S. quadricauda on the growth of the “young” test culture of M. arcuatum and, conversely, the toxic effect of cell-free filtrates from the different “age” (2, 7, 10, 15, 21, and 28 days) monoculture of M. arcuatum on the growth of the “young” test culture of S. quadricauda was evaluated. Simultaneously, the toxicity of their own filtrates of different “ages” was monitored by a test culture of each species. The interactions of the species in the mixed culture can be regarded as negative, as an antagonistic one, when both populations inhibit the growth of each other through metabolites and food resource competition, while the effect of S. quadricauda on M. arcuatum is much stronger. The main factor constraining the growth of monoculture S. quadricauda is the rapid depletion of the food resource from the medium and not the inhibition of growth by its own metabolites. The depletion of the food resources from the medium in monoculture of M. arcuatum occurs much later than in monoculture of S. quadricauda. Metabolites of S. quadricauda cause a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of M. arcuatum, and the metabolites of M. arcuatum cause a weak inhibitory effect on the growth of S. quadricauda. The filtrates of the “old” culture of S. quadricauda (21–28 days) cause the greatest inhibitory effect on cell division of M. arcuatum. The filtrates of the “old” culture of S. quadricauda (21–28 days) cause the greatest inhibitory effect on cell division of M. arcuatum. Comparative analysis of the cell number dynamics of two species, S. quadricauda and M. arcuatum, in mono- and two-species algal cultures, as well as experiments with filtrates of these monocultures, showed that the interaction of species can be explained by the food resource competition and allelopathic interaction (exometabolite effect).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sommer, U., The impact of light intensity and daylength on silicate and nitrate competition among marine phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1994, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1680–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cembella, A., Chemical ecology of eukaryotic microalgae in marine ecosystems, Phycologia, 2003, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 420–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tillmann, U., Alpermann, T., John, U., and Cembella, A., Allelochemical interactions and short-term effects of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium on selected photoautotrophic and heterotrophic protists, Harmful Algae, 2008, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zak, A., Musiewicz, K., and Kosakowska, A., Allelopathic activity of the Baltic cyanobacteria against microalgae, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 2012, vol. 112, pp. 4–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nabivailo, Yu.V., Skriptsova, A.V., and Titlyanov, E.A., The interspecific relationships of seaweeds and their role in the formation of communities of Ahnfeltia tobuchiensis (Kanno et Matsubara, 1932) Makienko, 1970 (Rhodophyta), Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2014, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 344–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nabivailo, Yu.V. and Titlyanov, E.A., Competitive relationships in natural and artificial algal communities, Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2014, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belevich, T.A., Zapara, E.V., and Il’yash, L.V., Interaction between plankton algae at different nitrogen sources, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2009, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 379–385.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Novoveská, L., Franks, D.T., Wulfers, T.A., and Henley, W.J., Stabilizing continuous mixed cultures of microalgae, Algal Res., 2016, vol. 13, pp. 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, Y. and Xu, K., Co-existing growth relationships of a lipid-producing alga with three microalgae, Allelopathy J., 2013, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spirkina, N.E., Ipatova, V.I., Dmitrieva, A.G., and Filenko, O.F., Comparative dynamics of the growth of microalgae cultures of Monoraphidium arcuatum (Korsch.) Hind. and Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Bréb., Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 2014, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ilyash, L.V. and Belevich, T.A., Interaction between populations of marine microalgae Prorocentrum micans and Platymonas viridis in mixed cultures, Russ. J. Aquatic Ecol., 1996, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Ipatova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.A. Mikheev, V.I. Ipatova, N.E. Spirkina, 2018, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 16: Biologiya, 2018, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 78–84.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikheev, M.A., Ipatova, V.I. & Spirkina, N.E. Biotic Interactions between Two Species of Microalgae in Mixed Culture. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. 73, 63–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392518020062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392518020062

Keywords

Navigation