Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of Species for the Laboratory-Reared Algal Community by Their Hydrobiological and Biophysical Features

  • Biophysics
  • Published:
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phytoplankton communities can serve as bioindicators of the water system state. It is necessary to select the appropriate species of microalgae to develop a model of a natural ecosystem that will allow performing multifactor experiments on the influence of physicochemical factors on the biophysical and hydrobiological characteristics of phytoplankton. This study has allowed selecting six species from those available in a museum to establish a model algal community. We have found that similar conditions are required for their optimal growth (light, temperature, and medium nutrients' supply). A medium with low nitrogen content is proposed to be used as a basal medium. Under these conditions, the cells function in a proper way and the cultures show satisfactory growth, while the duration of reaching the stationary stage of growth (10–15 days) allows having more experiments for a limited time. The cells of the selected species have morphological differences that are sufficient for the automated identification within the polyculture. We have obtained the geometric characteristics of cells for the computer counting of each species in the community on the microphotographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellinger, E.G. and Sigee, D.C., Freshwater Algae: Identification and Use as Bioindicators, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Dokulil, M.T., Algae as ecological bioindicators, in Bioindicators & Biomonitors: Principles, Concepts, and Applications, Markert, B.A., Breure, A.M., Zechmeister, H.G., Eds., Oxford: Elsevier, 2003, pp. 285–329.

  3. Konyukhov, I.V., Selina, M.S., Morozova, T.V., and Pogosyan, S.I., Experience of continuous fluorimetric monitoring of phytoplankton at a mooring station, Oceanology, 2012, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falkowski, P.G. and Kolber, Z., Variations in chlorophyll fluorescence yields in phytoplankton in the world oceans, Plant Physiol., 1995, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buschmann, C., Photochemical and non-photochemical quenching coefficients of the chlorophyll fluorescence: Comparison of variation and limits, Photosynthetica, 1999, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 217–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beutler, M., Wiltshire, K.H., Meyer, B., Moldaenke, C., Luring, C., Meyerhofer, M., Hansen, U.-P., and Dau, H., A flurometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ, Photosynth. Res., 2002, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 39–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, M.M., Simple conditions for growth of unicellular blue-green algae on plates, J. Phycol., 1968, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pogosyan, S.I., Gal’chuk, S.V., Kazimirko, Yu.V., Konyukhov, I.V., and Rubin, A.B., Application of the MEGA-25 fluorimeter for determining the amount of phytoplankton and assessing the state of its photosynthetic apparatus, Voda: Khim. Ekol., 2009, no. 6, pp. 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matorin, D.N., Osipov, V.A., Yakovleva, O.V., and Pogosyan, S.I., Opredelenie sostoyaniya rastenii i vodoroslei po fluorestsentsii khlorofilla (Determination of the State of Plants and Algae by the Fluorescence of Chlorophyll), Moscow: Maks-Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merzlyak, M.N. and Naqvi, K.R., On recording the true absorption and scattering spectrum of a turbid sample: Application to cell suspensions of the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2000, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 123–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, J. and Liu, D., Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton, J. Plankton Res., 2003, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1331–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., et al., Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods, 2012, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 676–682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levich, A.P., Revkova, N.V., and Bulgakov, N.G., The “consumption–growth” process in microalgae cultures and the needs of cells in mineral nutrition components, in Ekologicheskii prognoz (Ecological Forecast), Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Univ., 1986, pp. 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Fursova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © P.V. Fursova, E.N. Voronova, A.P. Levich, D.V. Risnik, S.I. Pogosyan, 2017, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 16: Biologiya, 2017, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 215–221.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fursova, P.V., Voronova, E.N., Levich, A.P. et al. Selection of Species for the Laboratory-Reared Algal Community by Their Hydrobiological and Biophysical Features. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. 72, 184–189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392517040046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392517040046

Keywords

Navigation