Abstract
This article considers applications of the formalism of subjective modeling proposed in [36], based on modeling of uncertainty reflecting unreliability of subjective information and fuzziness common of its content. A subjective model of probabilistic randomness is defined and studied. It is shown that a researcher–modeler (RM) defines a subjective model of a discrete probability space as a space with plausibility and believability that de facto turns out to be a subjective model of the class of subjectively equivalent probability spaces that model an arbitrary evolving stochastic object, and the same space with plausibility and believability is its subjective model. This enables us to empirically recover a subjective model of an evolving stochastic object accurately and using a finite number of event observations, while its probabilistic model cannot be empirically recovered. A similar connection is established between equivalence classes of plausibility and believability distributions and classes of subjectively equivalent absolutely continuous probability densities. For two versions of plausibility and believability measures, entropies of plausibility and believability distributions of the values of an uncertain element (UCE) \(\tilde x\) that model RM’s subjective judgments as characteristics of the information content and uncertainty of his judgments are considered. It is shown that in the first version entropies have properties that are formally similar to those of Shannon entropy but due to absence of the law of large numbers (LLN) their interpretation fundamentally differs from the interpretation of Shannon entropy. In the third version there is an analog of the LLN, and its connection to the Shannon entropy was obtained for the expected value of subjective informational content/uncertainty. A subjective model M(\(\tilde x\) )=(Ω,3(Ω), P ζ,ϰ (·,·;\(\tilde x\) ), N ζ,ϰ (·,·;\(\tilde x\) ) of an uncertain fuzzy element is considered, and an optimal subjective rule of identification of its states using observation data is obtained and studied. Methods of expert-aided reconstruction of fuzzy and uncertain fuzzy element models are also considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 72, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S002713491701012X
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Math. Models Comput. Simul. 5, 538 (2013). doi doi 10.1134/S2070048213060094
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Possibility as an Alternative to Probability, 2nd ed. (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2016).
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Intellekt. Sist. 11, 277 (2007).
A. L. Tulup’ev, S. I. Nikolenko, and A. V. Sirotkin, Bayesian Networks: A Logical-and-Probabilistic Approach (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2006).
A. Josang and R. Hankin, in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Singapore, 2012, p. 1225.
A. M. Mironov, Intellekt. Sist. 11, 201 (2007).
Applied Fuzzy Systems, Ed. by T. Terano, K. Asai, and M. Sugeno (Elsevier, 1989).
Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Recent Developments, Ed. by P. P. Yager (Pergamon Press, 1982).
D. A. Balakin, Yu. M. Nagornyi, and Yu. P. Pyt’ev, in Proc. Int. Conf. “Infinite-Dimensional Analysis, Stochastics, and Mathematical Modeling: New Problems and Methods,” Moscow, Russia, 2014, p.184.
V. Bhavsar and A. M. Mironov, in Proc. Workshop on Multi-Valued Logic Programming and Applications, Seattle, WA, 2006, p.73.
R. G. Cowell, A. P. Dawid, S. L. Lauritzen, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems (Springer, New York, 1999).
G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (Princeton Univ. Press, 1976).
A. Josang, in Proc. 11th Workshop on Preferences and Soft Constraints, Perugia, Italy, 2011. https://doi.org/home.ifi.uio.no/josang/papers/Jos2011-SofT.pdf.
S. S. Stevens, Psychophysics (Wiley, New York, 1975).
A. A. Josang, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 9, 279 (2001).
G. J. Klir, Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory (Wiley, Hoboken, 2006).
E. T. Jaynes, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 4, 227 (1968).
H. Jeffreys, Proc. R. Soc. London A 186, 453 (1946).
L. Zadeh, AI Mag. 7, 85 (1986).
P. Wang, in Proc. 10th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, Seattle, United States, 1994, p.560.
R. R. Yager, Inf. Sci. 41, 93 (1987).
T. Inagaki, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40, 182 (1991).
D. Dubois and H. Prade, in Reliability Data Collection and Analysis, Ed. by J. Flamm and T. Luisi (Springer, 1992), p.213.
F. Smarandache, Int. J. Appl. Math. Stat. 2, 1 (2004).
M. A. Klopotek and S.T. Wierzchon, in Belief Functions in Business Decisions, Ed. by R. P. Strivastava and T. J. Mock, (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002), p.62.
D. A. Balakin, B. I. Volkov, E. G. Elenina, A. S. Kuznetsov, and Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Intellekt. Sist. 18, 33 (2014).
B. MacMillan, Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 196 (1953).
Yu. P. Pyt’ev and I. A. Shishmarev, Probability Theory, Mathematical Statistics, and Elements of Possibility Theory for Physicists (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2010).
D. Dubois, H. T. Nguyen, and H. Prade, in Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, Ed. by D. Dubois and H. Prade (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2000), p.343.
S. Guiasu, Information Theory with Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977).
Yu. P. Pyt’ev and R. S. Zhivotnikov, Intellekt. Sist. 6, 63 (2002).
R. R. Yager, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 50, 279 (1992).
H. E. Kyburg, Jr., and H. E. Smokler, Studies in Subjective Probability (Wiley, New York, 1964).
L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1954).
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 73, 1 (2018). doi 10.3103/S0027134918010125.
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 72, 113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134917010131
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Methods for Mathematical Modeling of Measuring and Computing Systems, 3rd ed. (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2012).
Yu. P. Pyt’ev, Probability, Possibility, and Subjective Modeling in Scientific Research. Mathematical and Empirical Foundations, Applications (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.P. Pyt’ev, 2018, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 3: Fizika, Astronomiya, 2018, No. 2, pp. 3–17.
About this article
Cite this article
Pyt’ev, Y.P. Mathematical Methods of Subjective Modeling in Scientific Research. 2: Applications. Moscow Univ. Phys. 73, 125–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134918020145
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134918020145