Abstract
To address the failure of the toughness dissipation energy model to capture the effect of inter-load loading history factors on structural fatigue life under variable amplitude loading, in this paper, taking into account the interaction between loads, load order, and real-time damage, the ratio of stress amplitude between two adjacent levels and the real-time fatigue damage degree is introduced into the model calculation, and a new interaction factor related to the real-time fatigue damage function is established to obtain an improved nonlinear fatigue life prediction model. The predictive capability of the improved fatigue life prediction model is verified based on the test data of a variety of commonly used materials, such as 45 steel and aluminum alloy Al-2024-T42, under two-level and multi-level variable amplitude loading. According to the comparison analysis between the model-predicted data and the experimental data, it can be seen that the modified nonlinear fatigue life prediction model in this paper can effectively predict the remaining fatigue life for different materials under the multiple-level variable amplitude loading. Compared with other models, it is closer to the real experimental value. The data required in the model can be obtained from experiments without introducing additional parameters, which is more suitable for practical engineering.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R. Kashyzadeh, Kazem, et al. “Fatigue life analysis of automotive cast iron knuckle under constant and variable amplitude loading conditions,” Adv. Appl. Mech. 3 (2), 517–532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech3020030
J. Papuga, M. Margetin, and V. Chmelko, “Various parameters of the multiaxial variable amplitude loading and their effect on fatigue life and fatigue life computation,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 44 (10), 2890–2912 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13560
M. Nihei, P. Heuler, Ch. Boller, and T. Seeger, “Evaluation of mean stress effect on fatigue life by use of damage parameters,” Int. J. Fatigue 8 (3), 119–126 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(86)90002-2
W. X. Yao, “The description for fatigue behaviours of metals by stress field intensity approach,” J. Solid Mech. 18, 38–48 (1997). https://doi.org/10.19636/j.cnki.cjsm42-1250/o3.1997.01.005
J. L. Chaboche, and P. M. Lesne, “A non-linear continuous fatigue damage model,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 11 (1), 1–17 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x
M. Domaneschi, et al. “Collapse analysis of the Polcevera viaduct by the applied element method,” Eng. Struct. 214, 110659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110659
P. Paris and F. Erdogan, “A critical analysis of crack propagation laws,” J. Basic Eng. 85 (4), 528–533 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900
X. H. Yang, W. X. Yao, and C. M. Duan, “The review of ascertainable fatigue cumulative damage rule,” Eng. Sci. 5 (4), 82–87 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2003.04.013
M. A. Miner, “Cumulative damage in fatigue,” J. Appl. Mech. 12 (3), A159–A164 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458
K. Gao and X. Gao, “Nonlinear fatigue reliability analysis based on improved toughness exhaustion damage,” J. Railw. Sci. Eng. 19 (3), 807–813 (2022). https://doi.org/10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.t20210237
D. Y. Ye and Z. L. Wang, “A new approach to low-cycle fatigue damage based on exhaustion of static toughness and dissipation of cyclic plastic strain energy during fatigue,” Int. J. Fatigue 23 (8), 679–687 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00027-5
Z. Peng, H. Z. Huang, H. K. Wang, et al. “A new approach to the investigation of load interaction effects and its application in residual fatigue life prediction,” Int. J. Damage Mech. 25 (5), 672–690 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789515620910
W. Lu, W.B. You, S.G. Hu, et al. “Research on improved model of life assessment of missile recorder,” J. Ordnance Equip. Eng. 41 (3), 136−140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.11809/bqzbgcxb2020.03.027
L. Y. Xie, “On the equivalence of fatigue damage stress,” J. Mech. Strength. 2, 100–104 (1995). https://doi.org/10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.1995.02.018
D. G. Shang and W. X. Yao, “Study on nonlinear continuous damage cumulative model for uniaxial fatigue,” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 6, 8–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.1998.06.002
D. G. Pavlou, “A phenomenological fatigue damage accumulation rule based on hardness increasing, for the 2024-T42 aluminum,” Eng. Struct. 24 (11), 1363–1368 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00055-X
Y. Q. Fang, M. M. Hu, and Y. L. Luo, “New continuous fatigue damage model based on whole damage field measurements,” Chin. J. Mech. Strength. 28 (4), 582–596 (2006). https://doi.org/10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2006.04.023
A.D. Yu, et al. “A modified nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation model for life prediction of rolling bearing under variable loading conditions,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 45 (3), 852–864 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13641
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (no. 2019KF0204); and Liaoning Province 2020 College Innovation Talents Support Plan
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Xue, Q. A New Approach to the Combination of Load Interaction Effects and Damage Functions in Fatigue Life Prediction Based on Ductile Dissipation Energy. Mech. Solids 58, 1202–1213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423600113
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423600113