Skip to main content
Log in

Modern Geothermochronological and Paleomagnetic Potential for Solving Mineral Exploration Problems

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers in brief modern paleomagnetic and geochronological methods based on the study of the magnetic properties and isotope composition of rocks and successfully used in international practice in solving urgent applied and fundamental problems in geology, geophysics, and related sciences. The paleomagnetic method is widely used for spatially orienting borehole cores, allows intra- and interbasin correlations of paleontologically barren sedimentary cross sections, and is applied for the age correlation of ore-bearing intrusions and lava strata. Knowledge of the rock magnetic characteristics of rocks makes it possible to create 3D models of the poroperm characteristics of reservoirs of caustobioliths and reconstruct hydrocarbon migration paths. Thermochronological methods are generally used to reconstruct the thermal evolution of sedimentary basins: they make it possible to estimate the temperature and duration of heating of sedimentary and crystalline rock complexes; calculate the value of the geothermal gradient in the past, which is especially important for evaluating the conditions of hydrocarbon generation; reconstruct the tectonic history of sedimentary basins; calculate the thicknesses of eroded deposits; and identify the burial and uplift phases of crustal blocks. It is noted that the integrated use of modern methods and advanced equipment makes it possible to obtain comparable results at the world level. As an example, the results of multidisciplinary research on the Kola Peninsula are presented; they are used as a basis for creating a unique model of the tectonothermal evolution of northeastern Fennoscandia and the Barents Sea shelf. The article presents the resource base and the basic characteristics of the equipment used for the implementation of these methods at Russia’s leading scientific centers, such as Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan Federal University, and St. Petersburg State University. The developed apparatus makes it possible to carry out the whole set of studies considered in this work for the needs of Russia’s mining and energy complexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Burgess, S.D. and Bowring, S.A., High-precision geochronology confirms voluminous magmatism before, during, and after Earth’s most severe extinction, Sci. Adv., 2015, vol. 1, no. 7. doi 10.1126/sciadv.1500470

  2. Burov B.V., Balabanov, Yu.P., Yasonov, P.G., Khramov, A.N., and Rzhevskii, Yu.S., USSR Patent no. 606151, Byul. Izobret., 1978, no. 17.

  3. Fetisova, A.M., Veselovskii, R.V., Latyshev, A.V., Rad’ko, V.A., and Pavlov, V.E., Magnetic stratigraphy of the Permian–Triassic traps in the Kotui River valley (Siberian Platform): New paleomagnetic data, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2014. vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 377–390. doi 10.1134/S0869593814040054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hounslow, M. and Muttoni, G., The geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Triassic: Linkage to stage boundary definitions, in The Triassic Timescale, vol. 334 of Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., Lucas, S.G., ed. (London, 2010), pp. 61–102.

  5. Ketcham, R.A., Forward and inverse modeling of low-temperature thermochronometry data, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 2005, vol. 58, pp. 275–314. doi 10.2138/rmg.2005.58.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laslett, G.M., Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., and Gleadow, A.J.W., Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 2. A quantitative analysis, Chem. Geol., 1987, vol. 65, pp. 1–13. doi 10.1016/0168-9622(87)90057-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lisker, F., Ventura, B., and Glasmacher, U., Apatite thermochronology in modern geology, in Thermochronological Methods: From Palaeotemperature Constraints to Landscape Evolution Models, vol. 324 of Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., Lisker, F., Ventura, B., and Glasmacher, U.A., eds. (London, 2009), pp. 1–23.

  8. Manning, E.B. and Elmore, R.D., An integrated paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and geochemical study of the Marcellus shale in the Valley and Ridge province in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 120, pp. 705–724. doi 10.1002/2014JB011418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paleomagnitologiya (Paleomagnetology), Khramov, A.N., ed., Leningrad: Nedra, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlov, V.E., Fluteau, F., Veselovskiy, R.V., Fetisova, A.M., and Latyshev, A.V., Secular geomagnetic variations and volcanic pulses in the Permian–Triassic traps of the Norilsk and Maimecha-Kotui provinces, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2011, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 402–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Popov, V.V. and Khramov, A.N., New methods of core spatial orientation, Neftegaz. Geol. Teor. Prakt., 2007, no. 2.

  12. Solov’ev, A.V., Izuchenie tektonicheskikh protsessov v oblasti konvergentsii litosfernykh plit. Metody trekovogo i strukturnogo analiza (Studies of Tectonic Processes in the Zone of Lithospheric Plates Convergence: Track and Structural Analysis Methods), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.

  13. Symons, D.T.A. and Arne, D.C., Paleomagnetic constraints on Zn–Pb ore genesis of the Pillara Mine, Lennard Shelf, Western Australia, Miner. Deposita, 2005, vol. 39, pp. 944–959. doi 10.1007/s00126-004-0446-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Alstine, D.R. and Butterworth, J.E., Paleomagnetic core orientation helps determine the sedimentological, paleostress, and fluid-migration history in the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela, Core Workshop for I Congreso Virtual de Sedimentología, 2002.

  15. Veselovskiy, R.V., Thomson, S.N., Arzamastsev, A.A., and Zakharov, V.S., Apatite fission track thermochronology of Khibina Massif (Kola Peninsula, Russia): Implications for post-Devonian tectonics of the NE Fennoscandia, Tectonophysics, 2015, vol. 665, pp. 157–163. doi 10.1016/ j.tecto.2015.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Part of the described laboratory equipment was purchased at the expense of the grant (megagrant) no. 14.Z50.31.0017 from the Government of the Russian Federation. The studies were supported in part by the indicated megagrant, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 17-05-01121, 17-45-160835 and 16-35-60114), the grant of President of Russian Federation no. MD1116.2018.5, and by the State scientific program of Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. I. Powerman, R. V. Veselovskiy or S. V. Malyshev.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powerman, V.I., Veselovskiy, R.V., Nurgaliev, D.K. et al. Modern Geothermochronological and Paleomagnetic Potential for Solving Mineral Exploration Problems. Seism. Instr. 54, 579–585 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918050110

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918050110

Keywords:

Navigation