Skip to main content
Log in

The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three methods, FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster were compared for accuracy and sensitivity for counting numbers of nematode eggs in faeces of naturally infected cattle with high or low nematode egg counts. Only FLOTAC gave positive results for 12 replicates from pooled samples with low egg counts making it more sensitive than FECPAK (67%) and McMaster (41.7%). FLOTAC resulted in generally higher egg counts and lower coefficients of variation than the other two methods used. The reliability of FECPAK and McMaster is depended on the area under the slide counted. All three methods can be used for making decisions whether to treat but FLOTAC or Mini-FLOTAC should be used for faecal egg count reduction tests when lower egg counts are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coles G.C., Bauer C., Borgsteede F.H., Geerts S., Klei T.R., Taylor M.A., Waller P.J. 1992. World association for the advancement of veterinary parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Veterinary Parasitology, 44, 35–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D.D., Todd A.C. 1962. Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 141, 706–709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Veneziano V., Capelli G., Scala A. 2004. The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the Mc-Master technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology, 123, 121–131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Maurelli M.P., Utzinger J. 2010. FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopici diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nature Protocols, 5, 503–551. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Albonico M., Bergquist R., Utzinger J. 2103. Geospatial(s) tools: integration of advanced epidemiological sampling and novel diagnostics. Geospatial Health, 7, 399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egwang T.G., Slocombe J.O. 1982. Evaluation of the Cornell-Wisconsin centrifugal flotation technique for recoverins trichostrongylid eggs from bovine feces. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine, 46, 133–137.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H., Whitlock H.V. 1939. A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal Council Scientific Industrial Research, 12, 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levecke B., Rinaldi L., Charlier J., Maurelli M.P., Bosco A., Vercruysse J., Cringoli G. 2012. The bias, accuracy and precision of faecal egg count reduction test results in cattle using McMaster, Cornell-Wisconsin and FLOTAC egg counting methods. Veterinary Parasitology, 188, 194–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levecke B., Rinaldi L., Charlier J., Maurelli M.P., Morgoglione M.E., Vercruysse, J., Cringoli G. 2011. Monitoring drug efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes when faecal egg counts are low: do the analytic sensitivity and the formula matter? Parasitology Research, 109, 953–957. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2338-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAFF, 1986. Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Techniques, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London (1986) 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mes T.H.M. 2003. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures. Veterinary Parasitology, 115, 311–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Presland S.L., Morgan E.R., Coles G.C. 2005. Counting nematode eggs in equine faecal samples. Veterinary Record, 156, 208–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland I.A., Leathwick D.M. 2011. Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: global issue? Trends in Parasitology, 27, 176–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Rinaldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bosco, A., Rinaldi, L., Maurelli, M.P. et al. The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle. Acta Parasit. 59, 625–628 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0282-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0282-7

Keywords

Navigation