Skip to main content
Log in

Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) genotypes to PEG-mediated water stress

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

Drought tolerance of two sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes, cultivated cultivar 1114 and interspecific line H. annuus × H. mollis, was studied under laboratory conditions using PEG-6000. Four levels of osmotic stress (−0.4, −0.6, −0.8 and −1.0 MPa) were created and performances were monitored against a control. Physiological and biochemical stress determining parameters such as malondialdechyde (MDA), proline content, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were compared between seedlings of both genotypes. The results indicated that both genotypes have similar responses at four osmotic potentials for all traits studied. All seedling growth parameters such as germination percentage, root length, shoot length, root and shoot dry weight decreased with increasing osmotic stress. MDA, proline, and H2O2 were found to be increased at different osmotic gradients in comparison to control. Cultivar 1114 was less affected than the interspecific line under these stress conditions. The data observed in the experiments revealed that perennial wild H. mollis can hardly be considered to be an excellent candidate of drought tolerance genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAOSTAT-Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Statistics Division. ProdSTAT: crops (30 November 2009) based on 2003–2007 data Available online:http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspxs

  2. Milkova T., Marekov N., Popov S., Wulfson N., Bogdanova I. Study on the Chemical Nature of Sterols contained in Bulgarian Sunflower Oil. Nahrung, 1977, 21, 1–6. doi: 10.1002/food.19770210102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rauf S. Breeding sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for drought tolerance, Commun. Biom. Crop Sci., 2008, 3, 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosnjak D.J. Drought and its relation to field crops production in Vojvodina Province (Serbia), Serbia & Montenegro), Zbornik-radova Naucni institute za ratarstvo I povratarstvo (Serbia and Montenegro), 2004, 40, 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lorens G.F., Bennet J.M., Loggale L.B. Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. II. Component analysis and growth rates, Agron. J., 1987, 79, 808–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad S., Ahmad R., Ashraf M.Y., Ashraf M., Waraich E.A. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) response to drought stress at germination and seedling growth stages, Pak. J. Bot., 2009, 41, 647–654

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faure N., Serieys H., Berville A., Cazaux E.. Occurrence of partial hybrids in wide crosses between sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and perennial species H. mollis and H. orgyalis, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2002, 104, 652–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jan C.C., Fernadez-Martinez J.M. Interspecific hybridization, gene transfer and the development of resistance to the brommrape race F in Spain, Helia, 2002, 25, 123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rönicke S., Hahn V., Horn R., Grone I., Brahm L., Schnabl H., Friedt W. Interspecific hybrids of sunflower as a source of Sclerotinia resistance, Plant Breed., 2004, 123, 152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaya Y., Evci G. The utilization from wild species in sunflower breeding, Int. Res. Conf., Plant Genetic Stoks-The Basis of Agriculture Today, Plovdiv, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Breton C., Serieys H., Berville A. Gene transfer from wild Helianthus to sunflower: topicalities and limits, Oléagineux, Corps Gras, Lipides, 2010, 17, 104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vassilevska-Ivanova R., Kraptchev B., Stancheva I., Geneva M. Agronomic characteristic and antioxidant activity of an interspecific hybrid line between Helianthus annuus and Helianthus mollis, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 2012, 65, 1211–1218

    Google Scholar 

  13. Griveau Y., Serieys H. Cleomene J., Belhassen E. Field evaluation of sunflower genetic resources in relation to water supply, Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 1998, 34, 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petcu E., Pâcureanu, J.M. Developing drought and broomrape resistant sunflower germplasms utilizing wikd Helianthus species, Helia, 2011, 34, 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vassilevska-Ivanova R., Naidenova N. Hybridization in the perennial sunflowers: Helianthus annuus × Helianthus mollis, Genet. Breed., 2005, 34,(3–4), 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  16. Labrousse P., Arnaud M.C. Serieys H., Berville A., Thlouarn P. Several mechanisms are involved in Helianthus resistance to Orobanche cumana Wallr., Ann. Bot., 2001, 88, 859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vassilevska-Ivanova R., Lidansky T., Tcekova Z. Observations on the seedling growth in some wild Helianthus genotypes, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 2000, 53, 77–80

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michel B.E., Kaufmann M.R. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000, Plant Physiol., 1973, 51, 914–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoagland D.R., Arnon D.I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil, California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular, 1950, 347, 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bates I.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies, Plant Soil, 1973, 39, 205–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cakmak I., Horst W.J. Effect of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max), Physiol. Plantarum, 1991, 83, 463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sergiev I., Alexieva V., Karanov E. Effect of spermine, atrazine and combination between them on some endogenous protective systems and stress markers in plants, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 1997, 51, 121–124

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A biometrical approach. Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill., 1980, p. 633

    Google Scholar 

  24. Albuquerque F.M., Carvalho N.M. Effect of type of environmental stress on the emergence of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merril) and maize (Zea mays L.) seeds with different levels of vigour, Seed Sci. Technol., 2003, 31, 465–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mwale S.S., Hamusimbi C., Mwansa K. Germination emergence and growth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in response to osmotic seed priming, Seed Sci. Technol., 2003, 31, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaya M.D., Okçu G., Atak M., Çikil Y., Kolsarici Ö. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), Eur. J. Agron., 2006, 24, 291–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blum A. Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation, Plant Growth Regul., 1996, 20, 135–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lilley J.M., Ludlow M.M.. Expression of osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in diverse rice lines, Field Crop Res., 1996, 48, 185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Passioura J.B.. Environmental plant biology and crop improvement, Funct. Plant Biol., 2002, 29, 537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cellier F., Conejero G., Breitler J.C., Casse F. Molecular and physiological responses to water deficit in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive lines of sunflower, Plant Physiol., 1998, 116, 319–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heikal M.M., Shaddad M.A. Alleviation of osmotic stress on seed germination and seedling growth of cotton, pea and wheat by proline, Phyton, 1982, 22, 275–287

    Google Scholar 

  32. Claussen W. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants, Plant Sci, 2005, 168, 241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Aspinall D., Paleg L.G. Proline accumulation: Physiological aspects, In: Paleg L., Aspinall D. (Eds.), The Physiology and Biochemistry of drought resistance in plants, Academic Press, Sidney, 1981, 215–228

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jain M., Mathur G., Koul S., Sarin N.B. Ameliorative effect of praline on salt stress induced lipid peroxidation in cell lines of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.), Plant Cell Rep., 2001, 20, 463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oraki H., Khajani F.P., Aghhlikhana M. Effect of water deficit stress on proline contents, soluble sugars, chlorophyll and grain yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids, Afr. J. Biotech., 2012, 11, 164–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baloǧlu M.G., Kavas M., Aydin G. Öktem H.A., Yücel A.M. Antioxidative and physiological responses of two sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cultivars under PEG-mediated drought stress, Turk. J. Bot., 2012, 36, 707–714

    Google Scholar 

  37. Šcorić D. Sunflower breeding for resistance of abiotic stresses, Helia, 2009, 32, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roumiana Vassilevska-Ivanova.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vassilevska-Ivanova, R., Shtereva, L., Kraptchev, B. et al. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) genotypes to PEG-mediated water stress. cent.eur.j.biol. 9, 1206–1214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-014-0355-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-014-0355-5

Keywords

Navigation