Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Acromegaly

Long-Acting Formulations

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Treatments in Endocrinology

Abstract

Somatostatin peptide analogs have revolutionized the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly. More recent deep intramuscular depot preparations have further improved control, with consistent suppression of growth hormone secretion and optimal lowering of insulin-like growth factor-1. Effective control of growth hormone should, with long-term use, reduce morbidity and mortality from acromegaly and has been shown to result in partial involution of the pituitary adenoma in the majority of treated patients.

The currently available depot formulations allow for an injection frequency of 14 days (lanreotide LA 30mg) to 28 days (octreotide LAR 20mg) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. In clinical practice, dose titration by evaluating a growth hormone day profile prior to the next injection can extend the interval between injection (to 6 or even 8 weeks in certain individuals). This is especially true for octreotide LAR, which also has increased flexibility regarding dosage with a 10 and 30mg preparation. The annual ‘drug cost’ is broadly similar between the two formulations though the additional expenditure on nurse time and clinic visits incurred by an increased injection frequency is a significant consideration. Decreased injection frequency improves acceptability for the patient without a loss in treatment efficacy. A subjective return of typical acromegalic symptoms, such as sweating and headache, also seem to be useful in predicting the timing of the next injection.

Other formulations and doses of lanreotide are currently being evaluated, but more interestingly, newer analogs with greater efficacy at the type 5 somatostatin receptor subtype, and pan-receptor analogs, are being developed. These peptides, in conjunction with the likely availability of a growth hormone receptor blocking agent (pegvisomant), will further expand the medical therapy options for patients with acromegaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Use of tradenames is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Vale W, Brazeau P, Grant G, et al. Premieres observations sur le mode d’action de la somatostatine, un facteur hypothalamique qui inhibe la secretion de l’hormone de croissance. CR Acad Sci (Paris) 1972; 275: 2913–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, et al. Hypothalamic polypetide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science 1973; 179: 77–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krulich L, McCann SM. Effect of GH-releasing factor and GH-inhibiting factor on the release and concentration of GH in pituitaries incubated in vitro. Endocrinology 1969; 85: 319–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rivier J. Somatostatin: total solid phase synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 1974; 96: 2986–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coy DH, Coy EJ, Arimura A, et al. Solid phase synthesis of growth hormone-release inhibiting factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1973; 54(4): 1267–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall R, Besser GM, Schally A, et al. Actions of growth hormone release inhibitory hormone in healthy men and in acromegaly. Lancet 1973; II: 581–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer W, Briner U, Doepfner W, et al. SMS 201-995: a very potent and selective analog of somatostatin with prolonged action. Life Sci 1982; 31: 1133–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. James RA, White MC, Chatterjee S, et al. A comparison of octreotide delivered by continuous subcutaneous infusion with intermittent injection in the treatment of acromegaly. Eur J Clin Investig 1992; 22: 554–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lancranjan I, Bruns C, Grass P, et al. Sandostatin LAR: A promising therapeutic tool in the management of acromegalic patients. Metabolism 1996; 45: 67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caron P, Morange-Ramos I, Cogne M, et al. Three year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with intramuscular slow-release lanreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82(1): 18–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heron I, Thomas F, Dero M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a long-acting formulation of the new somatostatin analogue BIM 23014 in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993; 76(3): 721–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillis JC, Noble S, Goa KL. Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acromegaly. Drugs 1997; 53(4): 681–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart PM. Current therapy for acromegaly. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2000; 11(4): 128–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner HE, Vadivale A, Keenan J, et al. A comparison of lanreotide and octreotide LAR for treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 1999; 51(3): 275–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies PH, Stewart SE, Lancranjan I, et al. Long-term therapy with long-acting octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR) for the management of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 1998; 48: 311–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart PM, James RA. The future of somatostatin analogue therapy. In: Davies JRE, editor. Best practice and research in clinical endocrinology and metabolism. London: Balliere Tindall, 1999; 13(3): 409–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kendall-Taylor P, Miller M, Gebbie J, et al. Long-acting octreotide LAR compared with lanreotide SR in the treatment of acromegaly. Pituitary 2000; 3(2): 61–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart PM, Stewart SE, Clark PM, et al. Clinical and biochemical response following withdrawal of a long-acting, depot injection form of octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR). Clin Endocrinol 1999; 50(3): 295–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Caron P, Tabarin A, Cogne M, et al. Variable growth hormone profiles following withdrawal of long-term 30mg slow-release lanreotide treatment in acromegalic patients: clinical implications. Eur J Endocrinol 2000; 142: 565–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkins PJ, Akker S, Chew SL, et al. Optimal dosage interval for depot somatostatin analogue therapy in acromegaly requires individual titration. Clin Endocrinol 2000; 53: 719–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chanson P, Boerlin V, Ajzenberg C, et al. Comparison of octreotide acetate LAR and lanreotide SR in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 2000; 53: 577–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Newman CB, Melmed S, George A, et al. Octreotide as primary therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 3034–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Robbins R. Editorial: Depot somatostatin analogs-a new first line therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82(1): 15–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giusti M, Gussoni G, Cuttica CM, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of slow release lanreotide treatment in active acromegaly: six-month report on an Italian multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81(6): 2089–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorcy Y, Dejager S, Chanson P. Time course of GH and IGF-1 levels following withdrawal of long-acting octreotide in acromegaly. Pituitary 2000; 3(3): 193–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Murray RD, Peacey SR, Rahim A, et al. The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in successfully treated acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol 2001; 54(1): 37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cozzi R, Arosio M, Cavagnini F, et al. Lanreotide 60mg in well-controlled acromegalic patients. Pituitary 2000; 3(1): 27

    Google Scholar 

  28. Caron PH, Beckers A, Cullen DR, et al. Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanretide (lanreotide autogel) in the management of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87(1): 99–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Amato G, Mazziotti G, Rotonoi M, et al. Long-term effects of lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR on tumour shrinkage and GH hypersecretion in patients with previously untreated acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 2002; 56(1): 65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Abe T, Ludecke DK. Effects of preoperative octreotide treatment on different subtypes of 90 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and outcome in one surgical centre. Eur J Endocrinol 2001; 145: 137–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanco-Prieto MJ, Besseghir K, Zerbe O, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a somatostatin analogue released form PGLA microspheres. J Controlled Release 2000; 67(1): 19–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, et al. Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(16): 1171–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reubi JC, Waser B, Schaer JC, et al. Somatostatin receptor sstl-sst5 expression in normal and neoplastic human tissues using receptor autoradiography with subtype-selective ligands. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 836–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have performed approved clinical trials for both Ipsen and Novartis pharmaceutical companies in the evaluation of lanreotide and octreotide as part of multicenter studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Andrew James.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilroy, J.J., James, R.A. Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Acromegaly. Mol Diag Ther 1, 149–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200201030-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200201030-00002

Keywords

Navigation