Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The “Lac-Mégantic tragedy” seen through the lens of the EnRiCH Community Resilience Framework for High-Risk Populations

  • Innovations in Policy and Practice
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Setting

On July 6, 2013, a train carrying oil derailed in downtown Lac-Mégantic (Quebec, Canada), causing major human, environmental, and economic impacts. We aim to describe, and learn from, public health strategies developed to enhance community resilience following the train derailment though the lens of the EnRiCH Community Resilience Framework for High-Risk Populations.

Intervention

Annual population-level surveys were conducted in Lac-Mégantic and surrounding areas to assess the long-term impacts of the disaster. Findings suggested that a solid upstream investment towards the development of adaptive capacity was needed. A “Day of Reflection” bringing together local stakeholders and citizens was organized, inspiring the elaboration of an innovative action plan. Leaders advocated for funding to support its implementation, leading to a substantial investment from the provincial government. Through a wide range of actions, the plan aims to bring psychosocial services closer to people, stay connected with the community, and foster community engagement.

Outcomes

Several lessons have been identified. After a disaster, there needs to be a balanced focus between the gaps/needs and strengths/capacities of a community. Moreover, public health actors must collaborate closely, all along the continuum of the upstream-downstream paradigm, with local organizations and citizens.

Implications

This unique experience, supported by an empirically-based framework, suggests that three vital ingredients are required for success in recovering from a disaster: (1) fostering community strengths and valuing citizen participation, (2) a strong political commitment to support upstream actions, and (3) a public health team able to support these actions.

Résumé

Contexte

Le 6 juillet 2013, un train transportant du pétrole déraillait au centre-ville de Lac-Mégantic (Québec, Canada), causant des impacts majeurs sur le plan humain, environnemental et économique. Notre objectif est de décrire les stratégies de santé publique développées pour favoriser la résilience communautaire suivant la tragédie ferroviaire et d’en tirer des leçons, à travers la lentille du « EnRiCH Community Resilience Framework for High-Risk Populations ».

Intervention

Des enquêtes populationnelles ont été réalisées annuellement à Lac-Mégantic et les environs pour examiner les conséquences à long terme de la catastrophe. Les résultats suggèrent qu’un important effort en amont était nécessaire afin de développer la capacité d’adaptation. Une journée de réflexion rassemblant des partenaires locaux et des citoyens a été organisée, inspirant l’élaboration d’un plan d’action innovant. Les leaders ont plaidé pour l’obtention d’un financement afin de soutenir son implantation, ce qui a mené à un investissement substantiel du gouvernement du Québec. À travers un large éventail d’actions, le plan vise à rapprocher les services psychosociaux de la population, rester connecté avec la communauté et promouvoir la mobilisation communautaire.

Retombées

Plusieurs leçons ont été tirées. Après une catastrophe, on doit porter une attention à la fois sur les lacunes/besoins et les forces/capacités de la communauté. De plus, les acteurs de santé publique doivent collaborer étroitement, autant en amont qu’en aval, avec les organisations locales et les citoyens.

Implications

Cette expérience unique, soutenue par un cadre fondé sur des données empiriques, suggère que trois composantes sont essentielles au succès du rétablissement post-catastrophe: (1) la valorisation des forces de la communauté et de la participation citoyenne, (2) un engagement politique fort pour soutenir les actions en amont, et (3) une équipe de santé publique capable de soutenir ces actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adibhatia, S., Dudek, O., Ramsel-Miller, J., & Birnbaum, M. L. (2015). Classification of disaster health publications. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 30(Suppl 1), S111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int, 11(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. L., Daily, E. K., O’Rourke, A. P., & Kushner, J. (2016). Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, part VI: interventional research and the disaster logic model. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 31(2), 181–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosmans, M. W. G., Benight, C. C., van der Knaap, L. M., Winkel, F. W., & van der Velden, P. G. (2013). The associations between coping self-efficacy and posttraumatic stress symptoms 10 years postdisaster: differences between men and women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(2), 184–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bromet, E. J., Havenaar, J. M., & Guey, L. T. (2011). A 25 year retrospective review of the psychological consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Clinical Oncology, 23(4), 297–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, E., Tremblay, L., Brunet, A., Rodgers, R., Jehel, L., Véry, E., et al. (2010). Course of posttraumatic stress symptoms over the 5 years following an industrial disaster: a structural equation modeling study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(6), 759–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Généreux, M., & Maltais, D. (2017). Three years after the tragedy: how the Le Granit community is coping. Bulletin d’Information de la Direction de Santé Publique de l’Estrie, 34.

  • Généreux, M., Petit, G., Maltais, D., Roy, M., Simard, R., Boivin, S., et al. (2015). The public health response during and after the Lac-Mégantic train derailment tragedy: a case study. Disaster Health, 2(3–4), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Généreux, M., Pinsonneault, L., & Roy, M. (2016a). Fostering partnerships between public health functions within health and social services organizations: a perspective from the province of Quebec (Canada). Journal of Preventive Medicine and Care, 1(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Généreux, M., Perreault, G., & Petit, G. (2016b). Portrait de la santé psychologique de la population du Granit en 2015. Bulletin d’Information de la Direction de Santé Publique de l’Estrie, 27.

  • Hull, A. M., Alexander, D. A., & Klein, S. (2002). Survivors of the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster: long-term follow-up study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 433–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, J., & Mcknight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path towards building and mobilising a community’s assets. Evanston: Institute for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltais, D., Lachance, L., Richard, M. C., & Gauthier, S. (2009). Effets à long terme d’une inondation sur la santé psychologique: étude longitudinale auprès de sinistrés et de non-sinistrés. Revue Francophone du Stress et du Trauma, 9(3), 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltais, D., Généreux, M., Roy, M., Bergeron-Leclerc, C., Cherblanc, J., Labra, O., et al. (2015). Conséquences de la tragédie de Lac Mégantic: processus de résilience des adultes au sein de la MRC du Granit. Grant received from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

  • Maltais, D., Bolduc, V., Morasse, L. P., & Roy, M. (2016). La résilience des communautés. In D. Maltais & C. Larin (Eds.), Lac-Mégantic: De la tragédie à la résilience. Quebec: Presses universitaires du Québec.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., & Ziglio, E. (2007). Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model. Promot Educ, 2(Suppl. 2), 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, T. L., Kuziemsky, C. E., Corneil, W., Lemyre, L., & Franco, Z. (2014). The EnRiCH community resilience framework for high-risk populations. PLOS Currents Disasters ; Edition 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.11381147bd5e89e38e78434a732f17db.

  • United Nations. (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030. United Nations.

  • Ziglio, E., Hagard, S., & Griffiths, J. (2000). Health promotion development in Europe: achievements and challenges. Health Promot Int, 15(2), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mélissa Généreux.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Généreux, M., Petit, G., Roy, M. et al. The “Lac-Mégantic tragedy” seen through the lens of the EnRiCH Community Resilience Framework for High-Risk Populations. Can J Public Health 109, 261–267 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0068-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0068-z

Keywords

Mots-cles

Navigation