Abstract
Objectives
This study examined the effect of mode of migration—primary immigration (direct migration from origin country) and secondary immigration (migration from a country of residence other than the origin country)—by level of economic development of country of origin on psychological distress of immigrants to Canada. The study focused on the explanatory role of mastery in the relationship between mode of migration/level of economic development of origin country and distress. Mastery is the belief that one can and does master, control, and shape one’s own life.
Methods
Data from the Neighbourhood Effects on Health and Well-being study, which contains important measures such as the mode of migration, was used to assess the study objectives. The analytic sample included 1496 Canadian-born and 387 foreign-born (non-refugee) participants. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to address the study objectives.
Results
Results point to a “healthy immigrant effect”—lower distress among the foreign-born than the native-born—but only among primary immigrants from less-developed countries. Secondary immigrants from less-developed countries report higher distress than the native-born and their primary-immigrant counterparts. The higher distress among secondary immigrants was due in part to lower mastery among this group. Immigrants from developed origin countries did not report different levels of distress than the native-born, irrespective of mode of migration.
Conclusion
This study fills an important gap in the literature on immigration and mental health and reveals that the healthy immigrant effect is not generalizable to all immigrants; it is contingent on the mode of migration/level of economic development of the country of origin.
Résumé
Objectifs
Examiner l’effet du mode de migration – immigration primaire (migration directe du pays d’origine) et immigration secondaire (migration d’un pays de résidence autre que le pays d’origine) – selon le niveau de développement économique du pays d’origine sur la détresse psychologique des immigrants au Canada. L’étude porte sur le rôle explicatif de la « maîtrise de la situation » dans la relation entre, d’une part, le mode de migration et le niveau de développement économique du pays d’origine, et d’autre part, la détresse. La maîtrise de la situation est. la conviction de pouvoir maîtriser, contrôler et façonner sa propre vie.
Méthode
Les données de l’étude Neighbourhood Effects on Health and Well-being, qui contient d’importants indicateurs, comme le mode de migration, a servi à évaluer les objectifs de l’étude. L’échantillon analytique englobait 1496 participants nés au Canada et 387 participants (non réfugiés) nés à l’étranger. Les objectifs de l’étude ont été abordés par modélisation linéaire hiérarchique.
Résultats
Les résultats indiquent la présence d’un « effet de l’immigrant en bonne santé » – une détresse moins élevée chez les personnes nées à l’étranger que chez celles nées au Canada – mais seulement chez les immigrants primaires des pays en développement. Les immigrants secondaires des pays en développement font état d’une détresse plus élevée que les personnes nées au Canada et les immigrants primaires. La détresse plus élevée des immigrants secondaires s’explique en partie par la moins bonne maîtrise de la situation dans ce groupe. Les immigrants de pays développés ne font pas état de niveaux de détresse différents de ceux des personnes nées au Canada, peu importe le mode de migration.
Conclusion
L’étude comble une lacune importante dans la littérature sur l’immigration et la santé mentale: elle révèle que l’effet de l’immigrant en bonne santé n’est pas généralisable à tous les immigrants, mais dépend du mode de migration et du niveau de développement économique du pays d’origine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglipay, M., Colman, I., & Chen, Y. (2013). Does the healthy immigrant effect extend to anxiety disorders? Evidence from a nationally representative study. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 15(5), 851–857.
Ali, J. (2002). Mental health of Canada’s immigrants. Supplement to. Health Reports, 13, 1–11.
Boyd, M. A., & Vickers, M. (2000). 100 years of immigration in Canada. Canadian Social Trends, 58(Autumn), 2–12 Available at: http://history404.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/49707647/100%20years%20of%20immigration%20in%20Canada.pdf (accessed December 12, 2015).
Gee, G. C., Ro, A., Gavin, A., & Takeuchi, D. (2008). Disentangling the effects of racial and weight discrimination on body mass index and obesity among Asian Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 98(3), 493–500.
Içduygu, A. (2000). The politics of international migratory regimes: Transit migration flows in Turkey. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 357–367.
Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rozenweig, M. R., & Smith, J. P. (2004). Immigrant health: Selectivity and acculturation. In N. B. Anderson, R. A. Bulatao, & B. Cohen (Eds.), Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Kennedy, S., Kidd, M. P., McDonald, J. T., & Biddle, N. (2015). The healthy immigrant effect: Patterns and evidence from four countries. Journal of Migration and Integration, 16(2), 317–332.
Kirmayer, L. J., Narasiah, L., Munoz, M., Rashid, M., Ryder, A. G., Guzder, J., et al. (2011). Canadian guidelines for immigrant health: Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: General approach in primary care. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal= journal de l’ Association medicale canadienne, 183(12), E959–E967.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data (pp. 200–220). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
Mental Health Commission of Canada(2012) Changing directions, changing lives: The Mental Health Strategy for Canada. Calgary, Alberta : 82–83. Available at: http://strategy.mentalhealthcommission.ca/pdf/strategy-images-en.pdf (Accessed January 29, 2018).
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress (2nd ed.pp. 10–11). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2010). Emotional well-being across the life course. In T. L. Scheid & T. N. Brown (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Montazer, S., & Wheaton, B. (2017). Economic conditions in countries of origin and trajectories in distress after migration to Canada: Results from the National Population Health Survey. Society and Mental Health, 7(1), 1–20.
O’Campo, P., Wheaton, B., Nisenbaum, R., Glazier, R. H., Dunn, J. R., & Chambers, C. (2015). The Neighbourhood Effects on Health and Well-Being (NEHW) study. Health & Place, 31, 65–74.
Paul, A. M. (2011). Stepwise international migration: A multistage migration pattern for the aspiring migrant. The American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1842–1886.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2–21.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bruk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (pp. 3–37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd..
Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1992). Households, employment, and the sense of control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 217–235.
Rote, S., & Aging, M. K. (2014). Social Relationships, and Health among older immigrants. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 38(1), 51–57.
Rumbaut, R. G. (2004). Ages, life stages and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1160–1205.
Takenaka, A. (2007). Secondary migration: Who re-migrates and why these migrants matter. Migration Information Source,. Available at: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/secondary-migration-who-re-migrates-and-why-these-migrants-matter/ (Accessed January, 2016).
The World Bank (1962a)–1986 (a). World Development Indicators (WDI) 1962–1986. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (Accessed December 11, 2014).
The World Bank (1962b–1986 (b)) World Bank Atlas. Washington, DC: World Bank.
The World Bank (2011). A Short History on historical classifications. Available at: http://go.worldbank.org/U9BK7IA1J0(Accessed December 11, 2014).
Urquia, M. L., Frank, J. W., & Glazier, R. H. (2010). From places to flows. International secondary migration and birth outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 71(9), 1620–1626.
Vang, Z., Sigouin, J., Flenon, A., & Gagnon, A. (2017). Are immigrants healthier than native-born Canadians? A systematic review of the healthy immigrant effect in Canada. Ethnicity and Health, 22(3), 209–241.
Wanigaratne, S., Cole, D. C., Bassil, K., Hyman, I., Moineddin, R., & Urquia, M. L. (2015). The influence of refugee status and secondary migration on preterm birth. Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(6), 622–628.
Wu, Y. W., & Wooldridge, P. J. (2005). The impact of centering first-level predictors on individual and contextual effects in multilevel data. Nursing Research, 54(3), 212–216.
Yassaad, L. (2012). The immigrant labor force analysis series: The Canadian immigrant labor market. Statistics Canada Catalogue no.71-606-X. Minister of Industry: Ontario, Ottawa.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grant MOP-84439 and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Grant 410-2007-1499 (Blair Wheaton, Patricia O’Campo, P.I’s).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montazer, S. Disentangling the effects of primary and secondary international migration on psychological distress: the role of mastery. Can J Public Health 109, 284–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0057-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0057-2
Keywords
- International migration
- Secondary migration
- Healthy immigrant effect
- Level of economic development
- Psychological distress
- Mastery