Abstract
Background
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and skin surface pH are indicators of skin barrier integrity. There is scant evidence on normative data for cutaneous homeostasis parameters in healthy individuals.
Objectives
To develop normative data for skin erythema, melanin, pH, SCH, and TEWL; identify differences in these variables among different anatomical locations; and explore factors that may modify these values.
Material & Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted in 87 healthy volunteers (34 males) aged 20 to 40 years. TEWL, SCH, pH, erythema, and melanin were measured on the cheeks, volar forearms, and palms.
Results
The lowest TEWL value corresponded to volar forearms (9.69 ± 2.94 g m−2·h−1) and the highest to palms (49.32 ± 14.55 g m−2·h−1). Erythema was more evident on cheeks than palms or volar forearms (413.51 arbitruary units [AU] vs. 259.98 AU vs. 252.02 AU). The lowest melanin index was documented for palms (92.72 ± 41.70 AU). pH levels were similar among the different locations. The erythema index was significantly higher in males versus females for all locations. Linear regression analysis adjusted for age and SCH revealed an increase in 0.45 ± 0.18 g m−2·h−1 for TEWL on the cheek and 0.32 ± 0.10 g m−2·h−1 for TEWL on the forearm for each one-year increase in age.
Conclusion
We provide normative data for individuals aged 20–40 years, across three anatomical locations, and propose a predictive model for TEWL on the cheek and forearm as a function of age and SCH
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark RAF, Ghosh K, Tonnesen MG. Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 1018–29.
Kalia YN, Pirot F, Guy RH. Homogeneous transport in a heterogeneous membrane: water diffusion across human stratum corneum in vivo. Biophys J 1996; 71: 2692–700.
Elias PM, Choi EH. Interactions among stratum corneum defensive functions. Exp Dermatol 2005; 14: 719–26.
Basketter D, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008; 21: 191–202.
Larcher F, Espada J, Díaz-Ley B, Jaén P, Juarranz A, Quintanilla M. Nuevos modelos experimentales para el estudio de la homeostasis y la enfermedad cutánea. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2015; 106: 17–28.
Barco D, Giménez-Arnau A. Xerosis: a dysfunction of the epidermal barrier. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 2008; 99: 671–82.
Stefaniak AB, Plessis Jd AB, John SM, et al. International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration. Ski Res Technol 2013; 19: 59–68.
Akdeniz M, Gabriel S, Lichterfeld-Kottner A, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. Transepidermal water loss in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 1049–55.
Ye L, Wang Z, Li Z, Lv C, Man M-Q. Validation of GPSkin Barrier ® for assessing epidermal permeability barrier function and stratum corneum hydration in humans. Ski Res Technol 2019; 25: 25–9.
Algiert-Zielińska B, Batory M, Skubalski J, Rotsztejn H. Evaluation of the relation between lipid coat, transepidermal water loss, and skin pH. Int J Dermatol 2017; 56: 1192–7.
Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Fluhr J, Brown BE, Feingold KR, Elias PM. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121: 345–53.
Feingold KR, Schmuth M, Elias PM. The regulation of permeability barrier homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 1574–6.
Armengot-Carbo M, Hernández-Martín Á, Torrelo A. Filagrina: papel en la barrera cutánea y en el desarrollo de patología. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2015; 106: 86–95.
Fajuyigbe D, Lwin SM, Diffey BL, et al. Melanin distribution in human epidermis affords localized protection against DNA photodamage and concurs with skin cancer incidence difference in extreme phototypes. FASEB J 2018; 32: 3700–6.
Khosrowpour Z, Ahmad Nasrollahi S, Ayatollahi A, Samadi A, Firooz A. Effects of four soaps on skin trans-epidermal water loss and erythema index. J Cosmet Dermatol 2018; 18: 857–61.
Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol 2012; 30: 269–73.
Kottner J, Lichterfeld A, Blume-Peytavi U. Transepidermal water loss in young and aged healthy humans: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Arch Dermatol Res 2013; 305: 315–23.
Nedelec B, Forget NJ, Hurtubise T, et al. Skin characteristics: normative data for elasticity, erythema, melanin, and thickness at 16 different anatomical locations. Ski Res Technol 2016; 22: 263–75.
Tagami H. Location-related differences in structure and function of the stratum corneum with special emphasis on those of the facial skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 2008: 413–34.
Ya-xian Z, Suetake T, Tagami H. Number of cell layers of the stratum corneum in normal skin — relationship to the anatomical location on the body, age, sex and physical parameters. Arch Dermatol Res 1999; 291: 555–9.
Logger JGM, Münchhoff CU, Olydam JI, Peppelman M, Van Erp PEJ. Anatomical site variation of water content in human skin measured by the Epsilon: a pilot study. Skin Res Technol 2019; 25: 333–8.
Holm EA, Wulf HC, Thomassen L, Jemec GBE. Assessment of atopic eczema: clinical scoring and noninvasive measurements. Br J Dermatol 2007; 147: 674–80.
Song Y, Pan Y. Mapping the face of young population in China: influence of anatomical sites and gender on biophysical properties of facial skin. Skin Res Technol 2019; 25: 325–32.
Plewig G, Marples RR. Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 1970; 54: 13–8.
Rawlings AV, Matts PJ. Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level: an update in relation to the dry skin cycle. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124: 1099–110.
Wa CV, Maibach HI. Mapping the human face: biophysical properties. Skin Res Technol 2010; 25: 38–54.
Alexander H, Brown S, Danby S, Flohr C. Research techniques made simple: transepidermal water loss measurement as a research tool. J Invest Dermatol 2018; 138: 2295–300.e1.
Machková L, Švadlák D, Dolečková I. A comprehensive in vivo study of Caucasian facial skin parameters on 442 women. Arch Dermatol Res 2018; 310: 691–9.
Greenhalgh DG. A primer on pigmentation. J Burn Care Res 2015; 36: 247–57.
Gunathilake R, Schurer NY, Shoo BA, et al. pH-regulated mechanisms account for pigment-type differences in epidermal barrier function. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 1719–29.
Man MQ, Lin TK, Santiago JL, et al. Basis for enhanced barrier function of pigmented skin. J Invest Dermatol 2014; 134: 2399–407.
Machková L, Švadlák D, Dolečková I. A comprehensive in vivo study of Caucasian facial skin parameters on 442 women. Arch Dermatol Res 2018; 310: 691–9.
Baumrin E, Mukansi MM, Sibisi C, Mosam A, Stamatas GN, Dlova NC. Epidermal barrier function in healthy black South African infants compared with adults. Pediatr Dermatol 2018; 35: e425–6.
Kim H, Lee M, Park SY, Kim YM, Han J, Kim E. Age-related changes in lip morphological and physiological characteristics in Korean women. Skin Res Technol 2019; 25: 277–82.
Acknowledgments and disclosures
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Richard Davies for improving the English of this manuscript. The results of this study are part of the PhD work of Trinidad Montero-Vilchez. Conflicts of interest: none. Funding: none
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Espinosa-Rueda, M.I., Montero-Vilchez, T., Martinez-Lopez, A. et al. Cutaneous homeostasis and epidermal barrier function in a young healthy Caucasian population. Eur J Dermatol 31, 176–182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4021
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4021