Skip to main content
Log in

Anti-Mi-2 antibodies characterize a distinct clinical subset of dermatomyositis with favourable prognosis

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background

Anti-Mi-2 antibody is a type of myositis-specific autoantibody found in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients.

Objectives

To investigate the clinical features and long-term outcomes in anti-Mi-2-positive dermatomyositis (DM) patients.

Materials and Methods

Serum anti-Mi-2β antibodies were detected in 357 DM patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and possible associated clinical features were investigated based on cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Results

Of the DM patients, 40/357 (11.2%) were positive for anti-Mi-2β antibodies and found to have a significantly higher frequency of V sign (72.5% vs 45.7%; p = 0.001), shawl sign (60.0% vs 35.6%; p = 0.003), and muscle weakness (77.5% vs 57.1%; p = 0.013), but a lower incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (37.5% vs 60.9%; p = 0.005) and malignancy (0% vs 12.0%; p = 0.041) than anti-Mi-2β-negative patients. Anti-Mi-2β antibody levels positively correlated with disease activity. After a median follow-up period of 44 months, 97.0% of patients showed clinical remission. Twenty-six anti-Mi-2β-positive patients had a disease course longer than two years, and 16/26 (61.5%) were monocyclic without relapse. Moreover, five patients (15.1%) were drug-free with complete remission for more than three months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that DM patients with positive anti-Mi-2β had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to anti-Mi-2β-negative patients (log-rank; p = 0.035). Interestingly, anti-Mi-2β antibodies did not disappear in all patients over time.

Conclusion

Anti-Mi-2β antibodies were associated with a subgroup of DM with a low frequency of ILD and malignancy, good treatment response, and favourable outcome. Moreover, anti-Mi-2β levels correlated with disease activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lundberg IE, de Visser M, Werth VP. Classification of myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McHugh NJ, Tansley SL. Autoantibodies in myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 290–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Merlo G, Clapasson A, Cozzani E, et al. Specific autoantibodies in dermatomyositis: a helpful tool to classify different clinical subsets. Arch Dermatol Res 2017; 309: 87–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reichlin M, Mattioli M. Description of a serological reaction characteristic of polymyositis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1976; 5: 12–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seelig HP, Renz M, Targoff IN, Ge Q, Frank MB. Two forms of the major antigenic protein of the dermatomyositis-specific Mi-2 autoantigen. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 1769–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP, Lane WS, Reinberg D. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 1998; 95: 279–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang HB, Zhang Y. Mi2, an auto-antigen for dermatomyositis, is an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: 2517–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashiwagi M, Morgan BA, Georgopoulos K. The chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta is required for establishment of the basal epidermis and normal differentiation of its progeny. Development 2007; 134: 1571–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinal-Fernandez I, Mecoli CA, Casal-Dominguez M, et al. More prominent muscle involvement in patients with dermatomyositis with anti-Mi2 autoantibodies. Neurology 2019; 93: e1768–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gofrit SG, Yonath H, Lidar M, Shoenfeld Y, Kivity S. The clinical phenotype of patients positive for antibodies to myositis and myositis-related disorders. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 37: 1257–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Petri MH, Satoh M, Martin-Marquez BT, et al. Implications in the difference of anti-Mi-2 and -p155/140 autoantibody prevalence in two dermatomyositis cohorts from Mexico City and Guadalajara. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15: R48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghirardello A, Zampieri S, Iaccarino L, et al. Anti-Mi-2 antibodies. Autoimmunity 2005; 38: 79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Komura K, Fujimoto M, Matsushita T, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of anti-Mi-2 antibodies in Japanese patients with dermatomyositis. J Dermatol Sci 2005; 40: 215–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brouwer R, Hengstman GJ, Vree Egberts W, et al. Autoantibody profiles in the sera of European patients with myositis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 116–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 344–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR, et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10–12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord 2004; 14: 337–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Selva-O’Callaghan A, Labrador-Horrillo M, Solans-Laque R, et al. Myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies in a series of eighty-eight Mediterranean patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 791–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rider LG, Giannini EH, Brunner HI, et al. International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 2281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujimoto M, Murakami A, Kurei S, et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1 gamma and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies in dermatomyositis. J Dermatol Sci 2016; 84: 272–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuda T, Ueda-Hayakawa I, Kambe N, et al. Four cases of anti-Mi-2 antibody-positive dermatomyositis: relationship between anti-Mi-2 antibody titre and disease severity and activity. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32: e233–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Love LA, Leff RL, Fraser DD, et al. A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups. Medicine (Baltimore 1991; 70: 360–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Targoff IN. Laboratory testing in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2002; 28: 859–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mammen AL. Dermatomyositis and polymyositis: clinical presentation, autoantibodies, and pathogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1184: 134–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Deakin CT, Yasin SA, Simou S, et al. Muscle biopsy findings in combination with myositis-specific autoantibodies aid prediction of outcomes in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016; 68: 2806–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamaguchi Y, Kuwana M, Hoshino K, et al. Clinical correlations with dermatomyositis-specific autoantibodies in adult Japanese patients with dermatomyositis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: 391–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Z, Lin F, Qin B, Liang Y, Zhong R. Polymyositis/dermatomyositis and malignancy risk: a metaanalysis study. J Rheumatol 2015; 42: 282–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Allenbach Y, Keraen J, Bouvier AM, et al. High risk of cancer in autoimmune necrotizing myopathies: usefulness of myositis specific antibody. Brain 2016; 139: 2131–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hill CL, Zhang Y, Sigurgeirsson B, et al. Frequency of specific cancer types in dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a population-based study. Lancet 2001; 357: 96–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roux S, Seelig HP, Meyer O. Significance of Mi-2 autoantibodies in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 395–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang H, Peng Q, Yin L, et al. Identification of multiple cancer-associated myositis-specific autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a large longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2017; 19: 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Muro Y, Ishikawa A, Sugiura K, Akiyama M. Clinical features of anti-TIF1-alpha antibody-positive dermatomyositis patients are closely associated with coexistent dermatomyositis-specific autoantibodies and anti-TIF1-gamma or anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51: 1508–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Betteridge Z, Tansley S, Shaddick G, et al. Frequency, mutual exclusivity and clinical associations of myositis autoantibodies in a combined European cohort of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients. J Autoimmun 2019; 101: 48–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hengstman GJ, Vree Egberts WT, Seelig HP, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with myositis and autoantibodies to different fragments of the Mi-2 beta antigen. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 242–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mierau R, Dick T, Bartz-Bazzanella P, et al. Strong association of dermatomyositis-specific Mi-2 autoantibodies with a tryptophan at position 9 of the HLA-DR beta chain. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 868–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ong CS, Keogh AM, Kossard S, Macdonald PS, Spratt PM. Skin cancer in Australian heart transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rothwell S, Chinoy H, Lamb JA, et al. Focused HLA analysis in Caucasians with myositis identifies significant associations with autoantibody subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 996–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Casciola-Rosen L, Nagaraju K, Plotz P, et al. Enhanced autoantigen expression in regenerating muscle cells in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. J Exp Med 2005; 201: 591–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mammen AL, Casciola-Rosen LA, Hall JC, et al. Expression of the dermatomyositis autoantigen Mi-2 in regenerating muscle. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 3784–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Betteridge ZE, Gunawardena H, McHugh NJ. Pathogenic mechanisms of disease in myositis: autoantigens as clues. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009; 21: 604–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Casciola-Rosen L, Mammen AL. Myositis autoantibodies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2012; 24: 602–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guo-Chun Wang or Qing-Lin Peng.

Additional information

Disclosure

Financial support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 81701615, 81971531 and 81571603) and Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (grant numbers: Z181100001718063 and Z171100001017208). Conflicts of interest: none.

Supplementary material

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, L., Zhang, YM., Chen, H. et al. Anti-Mi-2 antibodies characterize a distinct clinical subset of dermatomyositis with favourable prognosis. Eur J Dermatol 30, 151–158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2020.3750

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2020.3750

Key words

Navigation