Skip to main content
Log in

Enucleation of non-invasive tumors in the proximal pancreas: indications and outcomes compared with standard resections

近端胰腺非侵袭性肿瘤剜除手术: 指征及与传统标准切除手术效果比较

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of enucleation (EU) for proximal pancreatic non-invasive neoplasms.

Methods

Patients with solitary non-invasive neoplasms in the proximal pancreas from January 1998 to April 2014 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China were included. Different operations and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 123 patients were enrolled. Forty patients (32.5%) underwent EU including 18 patients who had tumors close to the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Sixty-one patients (49.6%) had pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) performed and 22 (17.9%) underwent central pancreatectomy (CP). Pathological outcomes included neuroendocrine tumors, cystic lesions, and solid pseudopapillary tumors. Operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were significantly reduced in the EU group. PD was associated with the greatest complication rate (55.7%), followed by EU (50%) and CP (40.9%), though the pancreatic fistula rate after EU was the highest (50%), especially in patients with tumors larger than 3 cm and tumors close to the MPD. EU had advantages in the preservation of pancreatic parenchyma and endocrine and exocrine function.

Conclusions

EU can be carried out safely and effectively for tumors in the proximal pancreas with improved outcomes compared with standard resections, even if the tumor is larger than 3 cm and close to the MPD.

摘要

目 的

评价近端胰腺非侵袭性肿瘤剜除手术的安全性与有效性。

创新点

以目前为止最大样本量的近端胰腺非侵袭性肿瘤的剜除手术的数据分析, 证实了剜除手术在这类患者中的安全性和有效性, 即使肿瘤直径> 3 cm 或临近主胰管肿瘤。 并且首次报道和证实了在这些患者剜除手术中发生主胰管损伤, 进行主胰管修补与支架置入是安全有效的。分析了同期进行不同手术方式患者的肿瘤资料, 阐明了肿瘤大小影响手术策略的制定。

方 法

详细对比了剜除手术和传统的胰十二脂肠切除术以及胰腺中段切除术的术前情况、 术中情况、 术后并发症资料 (表1~3), 尤其详细描述了临近主胰管和主胰管有损伤的患者剜除手术后并发症情况 (表4)。 同时, 附图说明了主胰管修补手术方法 (图1)。

结 论

近端胰腺非侵袭性肿瘤的剜除手术是安全有效的, 应该是这类患者手术治疗的首选推荐方式, 在大肿瘤和临近主胰管的肿瘤患者中也可施行。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atema, J.J., Jilesen, A.P., Busch, O.R., et al., 2015. Pancreatic fistulae after pancreatic resections for neuroendocrine tumours compared with resections for other lesions. HPB, 17(1): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Butturini, G., et al., 2005. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 138(1): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beger, H.G., Poch, B., Vasilescu, C., 2014. Benign cystic neoplasm and endocrine tumours of the pancreas—when and how to operate—an overview. Int. J. Surg., 12(6): 606–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brient, C., Regenet, N., Sulpice, L., et al., 2012. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulization subsequent to enucleation. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 16(10): 1883–1887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1971-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butte, J.M., Brennan, M.F., Gönen, M., et al., 2011. Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas. Clinical features, surgical outcomes, and long-term survival in 45 consecutive patients from a single center. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 15(2): 350–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1337-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casadei, R., Ricci, C., Rega, D., et al., 2010. Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? A single-center experience. Pancreas, 39(6): 825–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181cf155c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cauley, C.E., Pitt, H.A., Ziegler, K.M., et al., 2012. Pancreatic enucleation: improved outcomes compared to resection. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 16(7): 1347–1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1893-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, S., Bassi, C., Salvia, R., et al., 2007. Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms. Br. J. Surg., 94(10): 1254–1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, S., Boninsegna, L., Partelli, S., et al., 2010. Parenchymasparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci., 17(6): 782–787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0224-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X., Gao, S.L., Xie, Q.P., et al., 2008. In situ highvolume modified continuous closed and/or open lavage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas, 36(1): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0b013e31812e9688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconi, M., Zerbi, A., Crippa, S., et al., 2010. Parenchymapreserving resections for small nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 17(6): 1621–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0949-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrone, C.R., Tang, L.H., Tomlinson, J., et al., 2007. Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: can the WHO classification system be simplified? J. Clin. Oncol., 25(35): 5609–5615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, C., Luo, X., Chen, X., et al., 2010. Enucleation of pancreatic cystadenomas. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 14(1): 141–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1023-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaneh, P., Neoptolemos, J.P., 1999. Exocrine pancreatic function following pancreatectomy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 880: 308–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goasguen, N., Bourrier, A., Ponsot, P., et al., 2009. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and enucleation. Am. J. Surg., 197(6): 715–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grobmyer, S.R., Pieracci, F.M., Allen, P.J., et al., 2007. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 204(3): 356–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackert, T., Hinz, U., Fritz, S., et al., 2011. Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg., 396(8): 1197–1203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0801-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeger, K., Falconi, M., Partelli, S., et al., 2014. Increased rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after deep enucleation of small pancreatic tumors. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg., 399(3): 315–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1171-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V., Heslin, M.J., 2003. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg., 237(4): 509–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000059981.13160.97

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.M., Hess, W., 2002. History of the Pancreas: Mystery of a Hidden Organ. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inchauste, S.M., Lanier, B.J., Libutti, S.K., et al., 2012. Rate of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J. Surg., 36(7): 1517–1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1598-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, J.M., Nakeeb, A., Komorowski, R.A., et al., 2003. Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect? J. Gastrointest. Surg., 7(7): 890–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-003-0035-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulke, M.H., Benson, A.B.3rd, Bergsland, E., et al., 2012. Neuroendocrine tumors. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw., 10(6): 724–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • le Borgne, J., de Calan, L., Partensky, C., 1999. Cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas: a multiinstitutional retrospective study of 398 cases. French Surgical Association. Ann. Surg., 230(2): 152–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W.J., Xu, B., Gao, S.L., et al., 2012. Enucleation of benign or borderline pancreatic head tumors adjacent to the common pancreatic duct. Pancreas, 41(2): 336–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e318229b891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madan, A.K., Weldon, C.B., Long, W.P., et al., 2004. Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J. Surg. Oncol., 85(4): 193–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.20019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.A., 2006. Surgery for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 10(3): 327–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papavramidis, T., Papavramidis, S., 2005. Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: review of 718 patients reported in English literature. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 200(6): 965–972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, S.C., Pitt, H.A., Baker, M.S., et al., 2009. Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? J. Gastrointest. Surg., 13(9): 1692–1698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0946-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ramage, J.K., Davies, A.H., Ardill, J., et al., 2005. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours. Gut, 54: iv1–iv16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.053314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Lombardo, K.M., Ramos-de la Medin, A., Thomsen, K., et al., 2007. Long-term anastomotic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign diseases. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 11(12): 1704–1711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0369-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C.M., White, P.B., Waters, J.A., et al., 2007. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology. Ann. Surg., 246(4): 644–654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a9e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sciaudone, G., Perniceni, T., Lévy, P., et al., 2000. Enucleation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the head of the pancreas. Report of 2 cases. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 24(1): 121–124 (in French).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talamini, M.A., Moesinger, R., Yeo, C.J., et al., 1998. Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann. Surg., 227(6): 896–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T.C., van Lanschot, J.J., Bruno, M.J., et al., 2009. Functional changes after pancreatoduodenectomy: diagnosis and treatment. Pancreatology, 9(6): 729–737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000264638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turrini, O., Schmidt, C.M., Pitt, H.A., et al., 2011. Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreatic head/uncinate: resection or enucleation? HPB, 13(2): 126–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00256.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valsangkar, N.P., Morales-Oyarvide, V., Thayer, S.P., et al., 2012. 851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: a 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery, 152(3 Suppl.):S4–S12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wente, M.N., Veit, J.A., Bassi, C., et al., 2007a. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery, 142(1): 20–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wente, M.N., Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., et al., 2007b. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery, 142(5): 761–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J.F., Kuang, T.T., Ji, D.Y., et al., 2015. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 16(7): 573–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1400257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Xu, J., Wang, T., et al., 2013. Enucleation of pancreatic lesions: indications, outcomes, and risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 17(12): 2099–2104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2355-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Xu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30672072 and 30872531), the Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, China (Nos. 2014C 33187), and the National High-Tech R&D Program (863) of China (No. 2007AA02Z476)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Wj., Cai, Hl., Ye, Md. et al. Enucleation of non-invasive tumors in the proximal pancreas: indications and outcomes compared with standard resections. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 18, 906–916 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1600597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1600597

Key words

CLC number

关键词

Navigation