Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RILEM TC 266-MRP: round-robin rheological tests on high performance mortar and concrete with adapted rheology—rheometers, mixtures and procedures

  • RILEM TC 266-MRP - Round-Robin Rheological Tests
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in understanding the rheology of mortar and concrete as well as applying this understanding in the practice of construction necessitate an accurate assessment of materials’ rheological properties. It is well known that different rheometers for mortar and concrete deliver different results, as this was shown over 15 years ago in two measuring campaigns comparing concrete rheometers. Considering newly developed rheometers, including those to evaluate interface rheology and structural build-up at rest, as well as additional measurement procedures and data interpretation techniques, a new comparison campaign was carried out in 2018 at the Université d’Artois, in Bethune, France. This new campaign focused on measuring workability characteristics, flow curves, static yield stress values, interface properties and tribological data. A total of 14 different devices capable of measuring one or more of the above-mentioned characteristics were employed. These devices included four ICAR rheometers, the Viskomat XL, the eBT-V, the RheoCAD (two geometries), the 4SCC rheometer (two geometries), the plate test, the sliding pipe rheometer, a tribometer and an interface tool for the ICAR rheometer. This paper describes the mixture design and rationale of the five investigated concrete and three investigated mortar mixtures, design and analysis of the experiments, and comparison of test results. The findings confirmed some of the conclusions from two previous testing campaigns and expanded the findings to more modern concrete mixtures and more diversified sets of rheological devices. The investigated rheometers yielded different absolute values for material parameters, but they all were able to similarly distinguish between mixtures qualitatively. For static yield stress and interface rheology measurements, similar conclusions were obtained as for flow curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tattersall G, Banfill P (1983) The rheology of fresh concrete. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ovarlez G (2012) Introduction of the rheometry of complex suspensions. In: Roussel N (ed) Understanding the rheology of concrete. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 23–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Mechtcherine V, Gram A, Krenzer K, Schwabe J-H, Shyshko S, Roussel N (2014) Simulation of fresh concrete flow using discrete element method (DEM): theory and applications. Mater Struct 47:615–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roussel N, Geiker M, Dufour F, Thrane L, Szabo P (2007) Computational modeling of concrete flow: general overview. Cem Concr Res 37(9):1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallevik J (2003) Rheology of particle suspensions: fresh concrete, mortar and cement paste with various types of lignosulfonates. PhD dissertation, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

  6. Vasilic K, Gram A, Wallevik JE (2019) Numerical simulation of fresh concrete flow: insight and challenges. RILEM Tech Lett 4:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallevik JE, Wallevik OH (2017) Analysis of shear rate inside a concrete truck mixer. Cem Concr Res 95:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallevik O, Feys D, Wallevik J, Khayat K (2015) Avoiding inaccurate interpretations of rheological measurements for cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 78:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Banfill P, Beaupré D, Chapdelaine F, de Larrard F, Domone P, Nachbaur L, Sedran T, Wallevik O, Wallevik JE (2000) Comparison of concrete rheometers: international tests at LCPC, Nantes. NISTIR 6819

  10. Ferraris CF, Brower LE, Beaupré D, Chapdelaine F, Struble L, Domone P, Koehler E, Lin S, Sonebi M, Struble L, Tepke D, Wallevik O, Wallevik JE (2003) Comparison of concrete rheometers: international tests at MB, Cleveland OH, USA. NISTIR 7154

  11. Haist M, Link J, Nicia D, Leinitz S, Baumert C, von Bronk T, Cotardo D, Eslami Pirharati M, Fataei S, Garrecht H, Gehlen C, Hauschildt I, Ivanova I, Jesinghausen S, Klein C, Krauss H-W, Lohaus L, Lowke D, Mazanec O, Pawelczyk S, Pott U, Radebe NW, Riedmiller JJ, Schmid H-J, Schmidt W, Secrieru E, Stephan D, Thiedeitz M, Wilhelm M, Mechtcherine V (2020) Interlaboratory study on rheological properties of cement pastes and reference substances: comparability of measurements performed with different rheometers and measurement geometries. Mater Struct 53:92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferraris CF, Martys NS (2012) Concrete rheometers. In: Roussel N (ed) Understanding rheology concrete, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp 63–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Greim M (2019) Rheometers for paste, mortar and concrete: measurement technology—possibilities, challenges and limits, in one-day feedback—round robin test: comparison of concrete rheometers: international tests at the Artois University, Paris

  14. Macosko C (1994) Rheology, principles, measurements, and applications, Poughkeepsie. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coussot P (2005) Rheometry of pastes, suspensions, and granular materials. Application in industry and environment. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferraris C (1999) Measurement of the rheological properties of cement paste: a new approach, In: International RILEM Conference on the Role of Admixtures in High Performance Concrete

  17. Hafid H, Ovarlez G, Toussaint F, Jezequel P, Roussel N (2015) Assessment of potential concrete and mortar rheometry artifacts using magnetic resonance imaging. Cem Concr Res 71:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spangenberg J, Roussel N, Hattel J, Sarmiento E, Zirgulis G, Geiker M (2012) Patterns of gravity induced aggregate migration during casting of fluid concretes. Cem Concr Res 42(12):1571–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feys D, Khayat K (2017) Particle migration during concrete rheometry: how bad is it? Mater Struct 50(2):122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu H, Martys N, Ferraris C, De Kee D (2010) A numerical study of the flow of Bingham-like fluids in two-dimensional vane and cylinder rheometers using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) based method. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 165(7–8):362–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallevik J (2014) Effect of the hydrodynamic pressure on shaft torque for a 4-blades vane rheometer. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 50:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallevik J (2008) Minimizing end-effects in the coaxial cylinders viscometer: viscoplastic flow inside the ConTec BML viscometer 3. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 155(3):116–123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Billberg P, Roussel N, Amziane S, Beitzel M, Charitou G, Freund B, Gardner J, Grampeix G, Graubner C, Keller L, Khayat K (2014) Field validation of models for predicting lateral form pressure exerted by SCC. Cem Concr Compos 54:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roussel N, Cussigh F (2008) Distinct-layer casting of SCC: the mechanical consequences of thixotropy. Cem Concr Res 38(5):624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A (2016) Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct 49(4):1213–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roussel N (2018) Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cem Concr Res 112:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mechtcherine V, Nerella V, Kasten K (2014) Testing pumpability of concrete using sliding pipe rheometer. Constr Build Mater 53:312–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan D (2000) Pumping of concrete. PhD dissertation, École des Ponts ParisTech (in French)

  29. Feys D, Khayat K, Perez-Schell A, Khatib R (2014) Development of a tribometer to characterize lubrication layer properties of self-consolidating concrete. Cem Concr Compos 54:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasten K (2010) Gleitrohr-Rheometer—Ein Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Fließeigenschaften von Dickstoffen in Rohrleitungen. PhD dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden (in German)

  31. Djelal C, Vanhove Y, Magnin A (2004) Tribological behaviour of self compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 34(5):821–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vanhove Y, Djelal C, Magnin A (2004) Prediction of the lateral pressure exerted by self-compacting concrete on formwork. Mag Concr Res 56(1):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roussel N (2006) A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: theory, validation and applications. Cem Concr Res 36(10):1797–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Amziane S, Perrot A (2017) The plate test carried out on fresh cement-based materials: how and why? Cem Concr Res 93:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang M, Ferraris C, Zhu H, Picandet V, Peltz M, Stutzman P, De Kee D (2010) Measurement of yield stress for concentrated suspensions using a plate device. Mater Struct 43(1):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amziane S, Perrot A, Lecompte T (2008) A novel settling and structural build-up measurement method. Meas Sci Technol 19(10):105702

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge EQIOM Concrete for the donation, delivery and adjustment of the investigated mixtures. The technical support of the mix design team of EQIOM Concrete in changing the rheological properties of the mixtures to suit the testing program is greatly appreciated. The authors wish to express their gratitude and sincere appreciation to the French Group of Rheology (GFR), the agglomeration community Artois Com, the French National Federation of Public Works (FNTP), the Structure&Réhabilitation company, The Université d’Artois and the Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géo-Environnement (LGCgE) for giving financial support to perform this study. The authors acknowledge the support of the Civil Engineering Department of the Université d’Artois for making their facilities available to the research team, as well as Francis Thibaut (technical staff), Sacha Crepelle, Apolline Dilly, Agnaou Elhachemi, Salim Hammoumi, Issam Laiymani and Edouard Morel (students) for their help during three intensive days of testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, USA

    Dimitri Feys & Kamal Khayat

  2. School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK

    Mohammed Sonebi

  3. Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Sofiane Amziane

  4. University Artois, IMT Lille Douai, Junia, University Lille, ULR 4515, Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géoEnvironnement (LGCgE), 62400, Béthune, France

    Chafika Djelal, Laurent Libessart & Yannick Vanhove

  5. Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, 9052, Ghent, Belgium

    Khadija El-Cheikh

  6. Institute for Construction Materials, TU Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany

    Shirin Fataei, Irina Ivanova & Viktor Mechtcherine

  7. Schleibinger Geräte Teubert u. Greim GmbH, 84428, Buchbach, Germany

    Markus Greim & Helena Keller

  8. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Escuela de Ingeniería Civil en Obras Civiles, Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejercito 441, Santiago, Chile

    Ivan Navarrete

  9. University of Bretagne-Sud, UMR CNRS 6027, IRDL, 56100, Lorient, France

    Arnaud Perrot

  10. Engineering and Innovation, HeidelbergCement AG, 69181, Leimen, Germany

    Egor Secrieru

Authors
  1. Dimitri Feys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed Sonebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sofiane Amziane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chafika Djelal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Khadija El-Cheikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shirin Fataei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Markus Greim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Irina Ivanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Helena Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kamal Khayat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Laurent Libessart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Viktor Mechtcherine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ivan Navarrete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Arnaud Perrot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Egor Secrieru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yannick Vanhove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitri Feys.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This document is the result of an experimental campaign supported by and carried out by a taskgroup of RILEM TC 266-MRP. All members of the taskgroup are listed as authors for this paper, except for Faber Fabbris from EQIOM concrete. The following individuals are the members of RILEM TC 266-MRP who were not involved in the taskgroup: Rolands Cepuritis, Geert De Schutter, Siamak Fakhraei, Steffen Grunewald, Michael Haist, Stefan Jacobsen, Karel Lesage, Julian Link, Dirk Lowke, Tilo Proske, Nicolas Roussel, Wolfram Schmidt, Jon E. Wallevik, Ammar Yahia, and Jiang Zhu. This paper was reviewed and approved by all members of the committee.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feys, D., Sonebi, M., Amziane, S. et al. RILEM TC 266-MRP: round-robin rheological tests on high performance mortar and concrete with adapted rheology—rheometers, mixtures and procedures. Mater Struct 56, 90 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02173-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02173-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation