Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermal, microscopic, and rheological characterization of rejuvenated asphalt binders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transportation agencies are increasingly incorporating reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in asphalt mixtures due to the scarcity and increased costs of virgin resources. The usage of RAP brings both economic as well as environmental benefits. Nonetheless, because RAP is an aged, stiff, and brittle material, utilizing it in large quantities can make the pavement more prone to cracking and reduce its service life. Recycling agents (rejuvenators) are additives typically applied to partially restore the properties of aged asphalt binders and facilitate using higher RAP contents. While considerable effort has been made on evaluating the influences of recycling agents on asphalt binders’ performance, the rejuvenation mechanisms of recycling agents have not yet been thoroughly examined. This study's objective was to evaluate the influence of various types of recycling agents on the properties of asphalt binder blends containing 50% RAP binder. The oxidative stability of the recycling agents and rejuvenated binder blends was evaluated utilizing thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The glass transition region and the compatibility of the binder blends were assessed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Finally, atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments were conducted to study the mechanisms of the recycling agents at the nanoscale level. The results revealed a relationship between the phases detected in the microstructure and the physical characteristics of the binder blends. DSC analysis showed that after the inclusion of recycling agents, the breadth and temperature of the glass transition region were reduced, indicating the formation of a less brittle material. AFM observations showed that the dispersion of the polar molecular associations in the RAP binder correlated with the changes in the glass transition region as measured using the DSC. The study's findings were used to characterize the effectiveness of recycling agents based on the thermal, microstructural, and rheological properties of rejuvenated binder blends to help explain the mechanisms of recycling agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shen J, Amirkhanian S, Aune Miller J (2007) Effects of rejuvenating agents on superpave mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. J Mater Civ Eng 19(5):376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaumanis M, Mallick RB, Poulikakos L, Frank R (2014) Influence of six rejuvenators on the performance properties of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) binder and 100% recycled asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 71:538–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin F, Kaseer F, Arámbula-Mercado E, Epps Martin A (2017) Characterising the long-term rejuvenating effectiveness of recycling agents on asphalt binder blends and mixtures with high RAP and RAS contents. Road Mater Pavement Des 18(sup4):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Menapace I, Cucalon LG, Kaseer F, Arámbula-Mercado E, Martin AE, Masad E, King G (2018) Effect of recycling agents in recycled asphalt binders observed with microstructural and rheological tests. Constr Build Mater 158:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaseer F, Arámbula-Mercado E, Cucalon LG, Martin AE (2020) Performance of asphalt mixtures with high recycled materials content and recycling agents. Int J Pavement Eng 21(7):863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajib AI, Samieadel A, Zalghout A, Kaloush KE, Sharma BK, Fini EH (2020) Do all rejuvenators improve asphalt performance? Road Mater Pavement Des 23(2):358–376

  7. Abdelaziz A, Epps Martin A, Masad E, Arámbula Mercado E, Kaseer F (2020a) Effects of ageing and recycling agents on the multiscale properties of binders with high RAP contents. Int J Pavement Eng 23(4):1248–1270

  8. Cavalli MC, Mazza E, Zaumanis M, Poulikakos LD (2021) Surface nanomechanical properties of bio-modified reclaimed asphalt binder. Road Mater Pavement Design 22(6):1407–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkashef M, Elwardany MD, Liang Y, Jones D, Harvey J, Bolton ND, Planche JP (2020) Effect of using rejuvenators on the chemical, thermal, and rheological properties of asphalt binders. Energy Fuels 34(2):2152–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Lira RR, Cortes DD, Pasten C (2015) Reclaimed asphalt binder aging and its implications in the management of RAP stockpiles. Constr Build Mater 101:611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarron, B., Yu, X., Tao, M., & Burnham, N. (2012). The Investigation of “Bee-Structures” In: Asphalt Binders. Qualifying Project. Worcester, MA

  12. Apostolidis P, Liu X, Kasbergen C, Scarpas AT (2017) Synthesis of asphalt binder aging and the state of the art of antiaging technologies. Transp Res Rec 2633(1):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofko B, Handle F, Eberhardsteiner L, Hospodka M, Blab R, Füssl J, Grothe H (2015) Alternative approach toward the aging of asphalt binder. Transp Res Rec 2505(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaseer F, AE Martin, E Arámbula-Mercado (2019) Use of recycling agents in asphalt mixtures with high recycled materials con- tents in the United States: A literature review. Constr Build Mater 211: 974–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.286

  15. Elkashef M, Williams RC, Cochran EW (2018) Physical and chemical characterization of rejuvenated reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) binders using rheology testing and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mater Struct 51(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elkashef M, Podolsky J, Williams RC, Cochran E (2017) Preliminary examination of soybean oil derived material as a potential rejuvenator through Superpave criteria and asphalt bitumen rheology. Constr Build Mater 149:826–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia Cucalon L, King G, Kaseer F, Arambula-Mercado E, Epps Martin A, Turner TF, Glover CJ (2017) Compatibility of recycled binder binder blends with recycling agents: rheological and physicochemical evaluation of rejuvenation and aging processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(29):8375–8384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elkashef M, Jones D, Jiao L, Williams RC, Harvey J (2019) Using thermal analytical techniques to study rejuvenators and rejuvenated reclaimed asphalt pavement binders. Energy Fuels 33(4):2651–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elkashef M, Williams RC, Cochran EW (2019) Thermal and cold flow properties of bio-derived rejuvenators and their impact on the properties of rejuvenated asphalt binders. Thermochim Acta 671:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Verdonck E, Schaap K, Thomas LC (1999) A discussion of the principles and applications of modulated temperature DSC (MTDSC). Int J Pharm 192(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Daoudi A, Dony ACarter A, Ziyani L, & Perraton D (2020) Combined recycling of RAS and RAP: Experimental and modeling approach. In: RILEM International Symposium on Bituminous Materials. Springer, Cham, pp. 387–393

  22. Huang SC, Grimes W, & Qin Q (2015) Rejuvenator for enhancing RAP applications and improving materials compatibility: fundamental properties of asphalts and modified asphalt III: FP 16. Technical White Paper, Western Institute March

  23. Holleran I, Masad E, Holleran G, Wubulikasimu Y, Malmstrom J, Wilson DJ (2021) Nanomechanical mapping of rejuvenated asphalt binders. Road Mater Pavement Des 22(11):2478–2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdelaziz A, Masad E, Epps Martin A, Arámbula Mercado E, & Bajaj A (2021) Forthcoming Multiscale Characterization of Aging and Rejuvenation in Asphalt Binder blends with High RAP Contents. J Mater Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003910

  25. Hossain Z, Rashid F, & Roy S (2018) Multiscale evaluation of rejuvenated asphalt binders with a high RAP content (No. 18–06281)

  26. Rashid AF (2016) Multiscale mechanistic characterization of reclaimed asphalt pavements. Arkansas State University

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abdelaziz A, Martin AE, Masad E, Arámbula-Mercado E, & Kaseer F (2020b) Effect of recycling agents on the homogeneity of high RAP binders. In Advances in Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction II: Contributions to the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction (AM3P 2020), 27–29 May 2020, San Antonio, TX, USA (p. 243). CRC Press

  28. Mirwald J, Werkovits S, Camargo I, Maschauer D, Hofko B, Grothe H (2020) Understanding bitumen ageing by investigation of its polarity fractions. Constr Build Mater 250:118809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eyssautier J, Levitz P, Espinat D, Jestin J, Gummel J, Grillo I, Barré L (2011) Insight into asphaltene nanoaggregate structure inferred by small angle neutron and X-ray scattering. J Phys Chem B 115(21):6827–6837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, AE, Kaseer F, Arambula-Mercado E, Bajaj A, Cucalon LG, Yin F, & King G (2019) Evaluating the effects of recycling agents on asphalt mixtures with high RAS and RAP binder ratios. NCHRP Research Report (927)

  31. Bajaj A, Martin AE, King G, Glover C, Kaseer F, Arámbula-Mercado E (2020) Evaluation and classification of recycling agents for asphalt binders. Constru Build Mater 260:119864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arámbula-Mercado E, Kaseer F, Epps Martin A, Yin F, Garcia Cucalon L (2018) Evaluation of recycling agent dosage selection and incorporation methods for Asphalt Mixtures with High RAP and RAS Contents. Constr Build Mater 158:432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glover CJ, Davison RR, Domke CH, Ruan Y, Juristyarini P, Knorr DB, Jung SH (2005) Development of a new method for assessing asphalt binder durability with field validation. Texas Dept Transport 1872:1–334

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kandhal PS (1977) Low-temperature ductility in relation to pavement performance. In: Marek CR (ed) Low-temperature properties of bituminous materials and compacted bituminous paving mixtures. ASTM STP 628. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 95–106

  35. Bennert T, Haas E, Ericson C, Wass Jr E (2019) Evaluation of Overlay Tester Test Procedure to Identify Fatigue Cracking Prone Asphalt Mixtures (No. CAIT-UTC-NC57). Rutgers University. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation

  36. Anderson RM, King GN, Hanson DI, Blankenship PB (2011) Evaluation of the relationship between asphalt binder properties and non-load related cracking. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 80:615–664

  37. Jiang Y, Zhao R, Xi Z, Cai J, Yuan Z, Zhang J, Xie H (2021) Improving toughness of epoxy asphalt binder with reactive epoxidized SBS. Mater Struct 54(4):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kriz P, Stastna J, Zanzotto L (2008) Glass transition and phase stability in asphalt binders. Road Mater Pavement Des 9(sup1):37–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robertson, R. E., Branthaver, J. F., Plancher, H. E. N. R. Y., Duvall, J. J., Ensley, E. K., Harnsberger, P. M., & Petersen, J. C. (1991). Chemical properties of asphalts and their relationship to pavement performance (No. SHRP-A/UWP-91–510). Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council

  40. Jones DR (1992) Understanding how the origin and composition of paving-grade asphalt cements affect their performance. SHRP, Asphalt Research Tech. Univ. of Texas at Austin, Texas. Memo (4)

  41. Song M, Hourston DJ, Schafer FU, Pollock HM, Hammiche A (1998) Modulated differential scanning calorimetry: XVI. Degree of mixing in interpenetrating polymer networks. Thermochim acta 315(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hung AM, Fini EH (2015) AFM study of asphalt binder “bee” structures: origin, mechanical fracture, topological evolution, and experimental artifacts. RSC Adv 5(117):96972–96982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang H, Wang Y, Yu T, Liu Z (2020) Microstructural characteristics of differently aged asphalt samples based on atomic force microscopy (AFM). Constru Build Mater 255:119388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pauli AT, Robertson RE, Eggleston CM, Branthaver JF, Grimes W (2001) Atomic force microscopy investigation of SHRP asphalts. Am Chem Soc Div Petrol Chem 46(2):104–110

    Google Scholar 

  45. Loeber L, Sutton O, Morel JVJM, Valleton JM, Muller G (1996) New direct observations of asphalts and asphalt binders by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. J Microsc 182(1):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jäger A, Lackner R, Eisenmenger-Sittner C, Blab R (2004) Identification of four material phases in bitumen by atomic force microscopy. Road Mater Pavement Des 5(sup1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hofko B, Eberhardsteiner L, Füssl J, Grothe H, Handle F, Hospodka M, Scarpas A (2016) Impact of maltene and asphaltene fraction on mechanical behavior and microstructure of bitumen. Mater Struct 49(3):829–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Schmets A, Kringos N, Pauli T, Redelius P, Scarpas T (2010) On the existence of wax-induced phase separation in bitumen. Int J Pavement Eng 11(6):555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pipintakos G, Blom J, Soenen H (2021) Coupling AFM and CLSM to investigate the effect of ageing on the bee structures of bitumen. Micron 151:103149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Soenen H, Besamusca J, Fischer HR, Poulikakos LD, Planche JP, Das PK, Chailleux E (2014) Laboratory investigation of bitumen based on round robin DSC and AFM tests. Mater Struct 47(7):1205–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rasband W1 (1997) ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Amal Abdelaziz & Amy Epps Martin

  2. Mechanical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar

    Eyad Masad

  3. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Edith Arámbula-Mercado

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Akash Bajaj

Authors
  1. Amal Abdelaziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eyad Masad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amy Epps Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edith Arámbula-Mercado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Akash Bajaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amal Abdelaziz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelaziz, A., Masad, E., Epps Martin, A. et al. Thermal, microscopic, and rheological characterization of rejuvenated asphalt binders. Mater Struct 55, 98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01946-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01946-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation