Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A non destructive testing method for masonry by using UPV and cross validation procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a new procedure to assess the compressive strength of regular masonry starting from results of non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity tests (UPV) on the constituent materials. The procedure has been calibrated on a soft calcarenitic stone used in the heritage masonry of Southern Italy, and starts from the knowledge of the regression between UPV and the compressive strength (UCS) of the material, determined by means of a wide experimental campaign on different varieties of quarry samples. Through an improved cross validation technique, the proposed method allows to estimate the compressive strength of new samples by making only non-destructive measurements without the need to conduct compression tests. The quality of the procedure was assessed both at the block scale and at the wall scale by comparing the estimated results with those obtained experimentally. In particular, the experiments were performed using new quarry stone blocks and blocks taken from existing walls of two ancient buildings during restoration works. The proposed method has proven to be reliable for the investigated material and it is easy to apply also for other materials as soon as it is possible to carry out a preliminary calibration in the laboratory, which allows knowing the UPV–UCS relationship over a wide range of strengths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Thaickavil NN, Thomas J (2018) Behaviour and strength assessment of masonry prisms. Case Stud Constr Mater 8:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2017.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ISCARSAH–International Scientific Committee for Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage (2005) Recommendations for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage, Barcelona

  3. Valluzzi MR, Lorenzoni F, Deiana R et al (2019) Non-destructive investigations for structural qualification of the Sarno Baths, Pompeii. J Cultural Herit 40:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orenday-Tapia EE, Pacheco-Martínez J, Padilla-Ceniceros R, López-Doncel RA (2018) In situ and nondestructive characterization of mechanical properties of heritage stone masonry. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7473-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moropoulou A, Labropoulos KC, Delegou ET et al (2013) Non-destructive techniques as a tool for the protection of built cultural heritage. Constr Build Mater 48:1222–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faella G, Frunzio G, Guadagnuolo M et al (2012) The church of the nativity in Bethlehem: non-destructive tests for the structural knowledge. J Cultural Herit 13:e27–e41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European committee for standardization (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance

  8. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2018) Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”. pp.1–198 (in Italian)

  9. LL.GG. (2011) Linee guida per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008. 1:1–83

  10. European committee for standardization (2005) Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures

  11. CS.LL.PP. (2019) Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”». Gazz Uff della Repubb Italiana 35:1–337

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breysse D, Balayssac J-P, Biondi S et al (2019) Recommendation of RILEM TC249-ISC on non destructive in situ strength assessment of concrete. Mater Struct 52:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Río LM, Jiménez A, López F et al (2004) Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 42:527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trtnik G, Kavčič F, Turk G (2009) Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics 49:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hobbs B, Tchoketch Kebir M (2007) Non-destructive testing techniques for the forensic engineering investigation of reinforced concrete buildings. Forensic Sci Int 167:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amini K, Jalalpour M, Delatte N (2016) Advancing concrete strength prediction using non-destructive testing: development and verification of a generalizable model. Constr Build Mater 102:762–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. BS EN 13791:2019 (2020) Assessment of in situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete components. CEN, Brussels

  18. Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:871–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Alves CAS, Pamplona J (2008) Ultrasonic evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of granites. Ultrasonics 48:453–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aliabdo AAE, Elmoaty AEMA (2012) Reliability of using nondestructive tests to estimate compressive strength of building stones and bricks. Alex Eng J 51:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Çobanoǧlu I, Çelik SB (2008) Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Env 67:491–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0158-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grinzato E, Marinetti S, Bison PG et al (2004) Comparison of ultrasonic velocity and IR thermography for the characterisation of stones. Infrared Phys Technol 46:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2004.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Asadi M, Hossein Bagheripour M, Eftekhari M (2013) Development of optimal fuzzy models for predicting the strength of intact rocks. Comput Geosci 54:107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beiki M, Majdi A, Givshad AD (2013) Application of genetic programming to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 63:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties. Meas J Int Meas Confed 102:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh R, Umrao RK, Ahmad M et al (2017) Prediction of geomechanical parameters using soft computing and multiple regression approach. Meas J Int Meas Confed 99:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yilmaz I, Yuksek G (2009) Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sýkora M, Diamantidis D, Holický M et al (2018) Assessment of compressive strength of historic masonry using non-destructive and destructive techniques. Constr Build Mater 193:196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martini R, Carvalho J, Barraca N et al (2017) Advances on the use of non-destructive technique for mechanical characterization of stone masonry: GPR and sonic test. Procedia Struct Integr 5:1108–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vasanelli E, Colangiuli D, Calia A et al (2015) Ultrasonic pulse velocity for the evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of a highly porous building limestone. Ultrasonics 60:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vasanelli E, Colangiuli D, Calia A, Luprano VAM (2017) Estimating in situ concrete strength combining direct and indirect measures via cross validation procedure. Constr Build Mater 151:916–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1968) Data analysis, including statistics. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) Handbook of social psychology, vol 2. Addison-Wesley, Research Methods, pp 80–203

    Google Scholar 

  34. Geisser S (1974) A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 61:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4:40–79. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Ross SM (2009) Distributions of sampling statistics. Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 203–229

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?: arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7:1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Breysse D, Martınez-Fernandez JL (2014) Assessing concrete strength with rebound hammer: review of key issues and ideas for more reliable conclusions. Mater Struct 47:1589–1604. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0139-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. ASTM D2845–08 (2008) Standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock.

  40. UNI EN 772-1 (2011) Methods of test for masonry units: part 1—determination of compressive strength.

  41. UNI EN 1052-1 (2001) Methods of test for masonry: determination of compressive strength

  42. UNI EN 1015-11 (2007) Methods of test for mortar for masonry: part 11—determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Regione Puglia (P.O. PUGLIA FESR-FSE 2007–2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Heritage Science-National Research Council (ISPC-CNR), via per Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy

    E. Vasanelli, D. Colangiuli & A. Calia

  2. Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, via per Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy

    F. Micelli & M. A. Aiello

Authors
  1. E. Vasanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Micelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Colangiuli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Calia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. A. Aiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Vasanelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasanelli, E., Micelli, F., Colangiuli, D. et al. A non destructive testing method for masonry by using UPV and cross validation procedure. Mater Struct 53, 134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01568-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01568-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation