Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel bi-level optimization model-based optimal energy scheduling for hybrid ship power system

  • Original research
  • Published:
MRS Energy & Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid growth of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, the application of traditional ships brings more and more serious pollution problems to the marine environment. For this reason, this paper aims at developing a novel optimal energy scheduling for hybrid ship power system based on bi-level optimization model to reduce fossil fuel consumption and protect the environment. Firstly, a hybrid ship power system model including the diesel generator system, energy storage system, propulsion system, service load system, and photovoltaic generation system is established. Taking the nonlinear and non-convex constraints in solving power generation scheduling and speed scheduling problems into account, an improved genetic algorithm-based bi-level energy optimization strategy is developed. Considering the mileage constraints in coupling constraints, an upper level model for ship energy scheduling is established with the objective of reducing fuel consumption; a lower level optimization model with the goal of minimizing mileage deviation is established through constraint decomposition and fed back to the upper level optimization model. Considering the normal and fault navigation conditions, simulation results verify that the proposed method can significantly minimize operating costs and greenhouse gas emissions by 5.33% and 2.46%, respectively.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available.

References

  1. S. Bengtsson, K. Andersson, E. Fridell, A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels: Liquefied natural gas and three other fossil fuels. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 225, 97–110 (2011)

  2. T.S.N. Rehmatulla, Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: a triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem. Energy Policy 84, 14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Q. Wang, X. Yang, Imbalance of carbon embodied in South-South trade: evidence from China-India trade. Sci. Total Environ. 707, 134473 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Guo, Q. Huang, L. Cui, The impact of the Sino-US trade conflict on global shipping carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128381 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Festag, Cooperative intelligent transport systems standards in Eeurope. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(12), 166–172 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Gao, Fu. Lijun, Soc optimization based energy management strategy for hybrid energy storage system in vessel integrated power system. IEEE Access 8, 54611–54619 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Johnson, M. Johansson, K. Andersson, Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 317–327 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Skjong, R. Volden, E. Rodskar, M. Molinas, T.A. Johansen, J. Cunningham, Past present and future challenges of the marine vessel’s electrical power system. IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrif. 2(4), 522–537 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Ghimire, D. Park, M.K. Zadeh, J. Thorstensen, E. Pedersen, Shipboard electric power conversion: system architecture applications control and challenges [technology leaders]. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 7(4), 6–20 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Ghimire, M. Zadeh, J. Thorstensen, E. Pedersen, Data-driven efficiency modeling and analysis of all-electric ship powertrain: a comparison of power system architectures. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif 8(2), 1930–1943 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Ghimire, N. P. Reddy, M. K. Zadeh, E. Pedersen and J. Thorstensen, “Dynamic modeling and real-time simulation of a ship hybrid power system using a mixed-modeling approach”, Proc. IEEE Transport. Electrific. Conf. Expo (ITEC), pp. 1–6, Jun. 2020.

  12. D. Park, M. Zadeh, Dynamic modeling, stability analysis, and power management of shipboard dc hybrid power systems. IEEE Trans.Transp. Electrif. 8(1), 225–238 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Zhang, Q. Guo, M. Liu, Na. Yang, R. Gao, B. Sobhani, Optimal dispatch of dynamic power and heat considering load management, water pump system, and renewable resources by grasshopper optimization algorithm. J. Energy Storage (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Zurita, C. Mata-Torres, J.M. Cardemil, R. Guédez, A. Rodrigo, Escobar, Multi-objective optimal design of solar power plants with storage systems according to dispatch strategy. Energy 237, 133627 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Yang, W. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Huang, Optimal reactive power dispatch of wind power plant cluster considering static voltage stability for low-carbon power system. J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy 3(1), 114–122 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Su, J. Teh, Two-stage optimal dispatching of AC/DC hybrid active distribution systems considering network flexibility. J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy 11(1), 52–65 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Yuan et al., A fuzzy logic energy management strategy for a PV/diesel/battery hybrid ship based on experimental database. Energies 11(9), 2211 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Shang, Fu. Lijun, X. Bao, Xu. Xinghua, Y. Zhang, H. Xiao, Energy optimal dispatching of ship’s integrated power system based on deep reinforcement learning. Electric Power Syst. Res. 208, 107885 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Yang, Y. Yuan, R. Ying et al., A novel energy management strategy for a ship’s hybrid solar energy generation system using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Energies 13(6), 1380 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Kenan, A. Bora, A new electrical energy management approach for ships using mixed energy sources to ensure sustainable port cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 40, 126–135 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Yijie, X. Qimeng, G. Diju et al., Two-level model predictive control energy management strategy for hybrid power ships with hybrid energy storage system. J. Energy Storage (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Lei, W. Yintang, L. Xiaoyuan et al., A modified power management algorithm with energy efficiency and GHG emissions limitation for hybrid power ship system. Appl. Energy (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Huang, H. Lan, Y. Hong et al., Joint voyage scheduling and economic dispatch for all-electric ships with virtual energy storage systems. Energy (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Q. Xu, B. Yang, Q. Han, Y. Yuan, C. Chen, X. Guan, Optimal power management for failuremode of mvdc microgrids in all-electric ships. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34(2), 1054–1067 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F.D. Kanellos, J.M. Prousalidis, G.J. Tsekouras, Control system for fuel consumption minimization–gas emission limitation of full electric propulsion ship power systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 228(1), 17–28 (2014)

  26. C. Shang, D. Srinivasan, T. Reindl, Economic and environmental generation and voyage scheduling of all-electric ships. IEEE Trans. on Power Syst. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2498972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Z.L. Gaing, Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints[J]. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18(3), 1187–1195 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Rajendra, D.K. Pratihar, Particle swarm optimization algorithm vs genetic algorithm to develop integrated scheme for obtaining optimal mechanical structure and adaptive controller of a robot. Intell. Control. Autom. 2(4), 430–449 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China under 61873228 and 62103357, and by the Science and Technology Plan of Hebei Education Department under QN2021139, and by the Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province under F2021203043, and by the Open Research Fund of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Smart Distribution Network, Nanjing Institute of Technology No.XTCX202203.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XW contributed toward conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal); and writing – review & editing (equal). ZL contributed toward conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); writing – original draft (equal); and writing – review & editing (equal). XL contributed toward conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); and resources (equal). SC contributed toward software (equal); supervision (equal); and validation (equal). HZ contributed toward software (equal); supervision (equal); and validation (equal). XG contributed toward supervision (equal) and writing – review & editing (equal). SW contributed toward formal analysis (equal); and investigation (equal).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, Z., Luo, X. et al. A novel bi-level optimization model-based optimal energy scheduling for hybrid ship power system. MRS Energy & Sustainability 10, 247–260 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-023-00068-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-023-00068-w

Keywords

Navigation