Abstract
The sustainability movement has more influence over company and government climate change actions than any treaty, law or regulation could possibly have, and results in quicker, measurable actions.
The sustainability movement is alive and well, and will continue to grow despite the outcry over some countries backpedaling from the Paris Accord. When one stops to consider just how much action companies from around the world have taken toward sustainability one cannot help but be amazed that so much was done without treaties, laws and regulations to force compliance. The primary driver of action is peer pressure—that which is derived from the actions of industry, and not the actions of government. This movement, found under a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) banner, will continue to grow by virtue of the continuous adoption of sustainability reporting, and in particular, supply chain reporting, benchmarking and risk management practices of industry, and the adoption of energy efficient (EE) projects. These actions have already resulted in significant positive changes to private company and government behavior, company value, lower emissions, greater operational efficiency, and competitive advantage. One could argue that peer pressure is much more effective than any treaty, laws, or regulations could possibly be. But, it should be noted that the term “climate change” remains a contentious issue and companies would be wise to refer to all related actions as sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and References
Kelly M.: (2016). Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 3. doi:10.1557/mre.2016.3.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Climate Change Definition. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/climate-change-basic-information (accessed February 25, 2017).
United Nations: The World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) (1987). Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (accessed January 12, 2017).
United Nations: World Summit on Social Development (2005). Available at: http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/worldsummit_2005.shtml (accessed January 12, 2017).
United Nations: Paris Agreement (2015). Available at: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed January 12, 2017).
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992). Available at: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php (accessed February 16, 2017).
Fingar T.: Statement for the Record: National Intelligence Assessment on the National Security Implications of Global Climate Change to 2030 (2008).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change (2010). Available at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/2010/33-9106.pdf (accessed January 10, 2017).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration: FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (2011). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ (accessed January 10, 2017).
U.S. Department of the Treasury: Terrorism Risk Insurance Program (2002). Available at: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/fin-mkts/Pages/program.aspx (accessed January 10, 2017).
U.S. Government: Energy Star Portfolio Manager®. Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/facility-owners-and-managers/existing-buildings/use-portfolio-manager (accessed January 12, 2017).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml (accessed February 22, 2017).
Arnold & Porter Kay Scholar: Climate Change Chemical Legislation (2017). Available at: http://www.apks.com/∼/media/files/climatechange-chemicallegislation/climatechangelitigationchart.pdf (accessed January 12, 2017).
United Nations: Framework Convention on Climate Change. Adaptation Private Sector Initiative (PSI). Available at: http://unfccc.int/adaptation/workstreams/nairobi_work_programme/items/4623.php (accessed February 24, 2017).
Ceres. Available at https://www.ceres.org (accessed February 26, 2017).
GRI. Available at https://www.globalreporting.org (accessed March 27, 2017).
Ernst & Young: Value of Sustainability Reporting (2016). Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_-_Value_of_sustainability_reporting/%24FILE/EY-Value-of-Sustainability-Reporting.pdf (accessed February 24, 2017).
UN Sustainable Stock Exchange (SSE) Initiative. Available at: http://www.sseinitiative.org/ (accessed February 23, 2017).
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: About the GHG Protocol (2001). Available at: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/about-ghgp (accessed January 31, 2017).
International Energy Agency: Energy Efficiency Market Report 2016. Available at: www.iea.org (accessed February 22, 2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Priddy, R.D. Sustainability: The train has left the station. MRS Energy & Sustainability 4, 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2017.4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2017.4