Skip to main content
Log in

Ceramic Immobilization Options for Technetium

  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long half-life biologically active fission products, such as technetium-99, present particular problems for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Technetium is present in relatively high concentrations in fuel (approx. 1kg tonne−1 SNF) and has very high mobility in oxidizing environments. Technetium is therefore generally removed from SNF either by solvent extraction and reduction, during the PUREX process, or by sorption via ion exchange processes. Historically technetium has been disposed of via dilution and dispersion in the sea but stringent regulations now mean that the preferred long term option is immobilization in a highly stable and durable matrix. In this contribution we have looked at the synthesis of fluorite derivative crystalline host phases based on the zirconolite structure. Samples have been characterised by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX), thermo-gravimetric analysis (TG), and mass spectroscopy (MS). We have used Mo as an inactive surrogate for Tc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. Till, in Technetium in the Environment, edited by G. Desmet and C. Myttenaere (Springer, New York, 1986), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Chen, P. C. Burns, and R. C. Ewing, J. Nucl. Mater. 278, 225 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Y. Khalil, and W. B. White, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, C197 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. J. Rossell, Nature 283, 282 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. M. Gatehouse, I. E. Grey, R. J. Hill, and H. J. Rossell, Acta Cryst. B37, 306 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. J. White, Am. Mineral. 69, 1156 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Lumpkin, Elements 2, 365 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Shannon, Acta Cryst. A32, 751 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Halikia, L. Zoumpoulakis, E. Christodoulou, and D. Prattis, Euro. J. Min. Proc. Environ. Protection.

  10. J. C. Marra, A. D. Cozzi, R. A. Pierce, J. M. Pareizs, A. R. Jurgensen, and D. M. Missimer, in Environmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies in the Ceramic and Nuclear Industries VII, edited by G. L. Smith, S. K. Sundaram, and D. R. Spearing (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, 2002), p. 381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stennett, M.C., Lee, TH., Bailey, D.J. et al. Ceramic Immobilization Options for Technetium. MRS Advances 2, 753–758 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.268

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2017.268

Navigation