Abstract
Anthropic activities impact ecosystems worldwide thus contributing to the rapid erosion of biodiversity. The failure of traditional strategies targeting single species highlighted ecosystems as the most suitable scale to plan biodiversity management. Network analysis represents an ideal tool to model interactions in ecosystems and centrality indices have been extensively applied to quantify the structural and functional importance of species in food webs. However, many network studies fail in deciphering the ecological mechanisms that lead some species to occupy the most central positions in food webs. To address this question, we built a high-resolution food web of the Gulf of California and quantified species position using 15 centrality indices and the trophic level. We then modelled the values of each index as a function of traits and other attributes (e.g., habitat). We found that body size and mobility are the best predictors of indices that characterize species importance at local, meso- and global scale, especially in presence of data accounting for energy direction. This result extends previous findings that illustrated how a restricted set of traitaxes can predict whether two species interact in food webs. In particular, we show that traits can also help understanding the way species are affected by and mediate indirect effects. The traits allow focusing on the processes that shape the food web, rather than providing case-specific indications as the taxonomy-based approach. We suggest that future network studies should consider the traits to explicitly identify the causal relationships that link anthropic impacts to role changes of species in food webs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ESM:
-
Electronic Supplementary Material
- EBM:
-
Ecosystem-Based management
- SST:
-
Sea Surface Temperature
References
Allesina, S., D. Alonso and M. Pascual. 2008. A general model for food web structure. Science 320:658–661.
Barbosa A.M., J.A. Brown, A. Jimenez-Valverde and R. Real. 2016. modEvA: Model Evaluation and Analysis. R package version 1.3.2. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=modEvA
Bodini, A., M. Rocchi and M. Scotti. 2018. Insights into the ecology of the Black Sea through the qualitative loop analysis of the community structure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63:968–984.
Bolnick, D.I., P. Amarasekare, M.S. Araújo, R. Bürger, J.M. Levine, M. Novak, V.H.W. Rudolf, S.J. Schreiber, M.C. Urban and D.A. Vasseur. 2011. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:183–192.
Bondavalli, C. and R.E. Ulanowicz. 1999. Unexpected effects of predators upon their prey: the case of the American alligator. Ecosystems 2:49–63.
Bornatowski, H., A.F. Navia, R.R. Braga, V. Abilhoa and M.F. Maia-Corrêa. 2014. Ecological importance of sharks and rays in a structural food web analysis in southern Brazil. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71:1586–1592.
Bustamante, R.H., G.M Branch and S. Eekhout. 1995. Maintenance of an exceptional intertidal grazer biomass in South Africa: subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology 76:2314–2329.
Cohen, J.E. and C.M. Newman. 1985. A stochastic theory of community food webs I. Models and aggregated data. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224:421–448.
Csárdi, G. and T. Nepusz. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695:1–9.
Díaz, S., J. Fargione, F.S. Chapin III and D. Tilman. 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLOS Biol. 4:e277.
Eklöf, A., U. Jacob, J. Kopp, J. Bosch, R. Castro-Urgal, N.P. Chacoff, B. Dalsgaard, C. Sassi, M. Galetti, P.R. Guimaraes, S.B. Lomascolo, et al. 2013. The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecol. Lett. 16:577–583.
García-Rosello, E., C. Guisande, J. González-Dacosta, J. Heine, P. Pelayo-Villamil, A. Manjarrés-Hernández, A. Vaamonde and C. Granado-Lorencio. 2013. ModestR: a software tool for managing and analyzing species distribution map databases. Ecography 36:1202–1207.
Guerry, A.D. 2005. Icarus and Daedalus: conceptual and tactical lessons for marine ecosystem-based management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3:202–211.
Harley, C.D., A. Randall Hughes, K.M. Hultgren, B.G. Miner, C.J. Sorte, C.S. Thornber, L.F. Rodriguez, L. Tomanek and S.L. Williams. 2006. The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 9:228–241.
Hothorn, T., F. Bretz and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 50:346–363.
Jordán, F., W.C. Liu and A.J. Davis. 2006. Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos 112: 535–546.
Lluch-Cota, S.E., E.A. Aragón-Noriega, F. Arreguín-Sánchez, D. Aurioles-Gamboa, J.J. Bautista-Romero, R.C. Brusca, R. Cervantes-Duarte, et al. 2007. The Gulf of California: review of ecosystem status and sustainability challenges. Progr. Oceanogr. 73:1–26.
Long, R.D., A. Charles and R.L. Stephenson. 2015. Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management. Mar. Policy 57:53–60.
Lotze, H.K., H.S. Lenihan, B.J. Bourque, R.H. Bradbury, R.G. Cooke, M.C. Kay, S.M. Kidwell, M.X. Kirby, C.H. Peterson and J.B. Jackson. 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312:1806–1809.
MacArthur, R. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36:533–536.
McGill, B.J., B.J. Enquist, E. Weiher and M. Westoby. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:178–185.
Moustaka-Gouni, M., K.A. Kormas, M. Scotti, E. Vardaka and U. Sommer. 2016. Warming and acidification effects on planktonic heterotrophic pico-and nanoflagellates in a mesocosm experiment. Protist 167:389–410.
Navia, A.F., V.H. Cruz, A. Giraldo and A. Barausse. 2016. The structure of a marine tropical food web, and its implications for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ecol. Model. 328:23–33.
Orth, R.J., T.J. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck, A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, F. Olyarnik, F.T. Short, et al. 2006. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience 56:987–996.
Petchey, O.L., A.P. Beckerman, J.O. Riede and P.H. Warren. 2008. Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105:4191–4196.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Reiss, J., J.R. Bridle, J.M. Montoya and G. Woodward. 2009. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:505–514.
Rocchi, M., M. Scotti, F. Micheli and A. Bodini. 2017. Key species and impact of fishery through food web analysis: a case study from Baja California Sur, Mexico. J. Mar. Syst. 165:92–102.
Sánchez-Ibarra, C., D.M. Bermúdez-García, J.E. Bezaury-Creel, C. Lasch-Thaler, N. Rodríguez-Dowdell, N. Cárdenas-Torres, S. Rojas-González de Castilla, A. Gondor (eds.). 2013. Plan de Acción para la Conservación y Aprovechamiento Sustentable de la Biodiversidad Terrestre y Marina de la Región Golfo de California y Pacífico Sudcaliforniano. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, A.C., 294 pp. México.
Scotti, M. and F. Jordán. 2010. Relationships between centrality indices and trophic levels in food webs. Community Ecol. 11:59–67.
Scotti, M. and F. Jordán. 2015. The structural importance of less abundant species in Prince William Sound food web. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 61:77–89.
Scotti, M., C. Bondavalli and A. Bodini. 2009a. Linking trophic positions and flow structure constraints in ecological networks: energy transfer efficiency or topology effect? Ecol. Model. 220:3070–3080.
Scotti, M., C. Bondavalli, A. Bodini and S. Allesina. 2009b. Using trophic hierarchy to understand food web structure. Oikos 118: 1695–1702.
Scotti, M., S. Allesina, C. Bondavalli, A. Bodini and L.G. Abarca-Arenas. 2006. Effective trophic positions in ecological acyclic networks. Ecol. Model. 198:495–505.
Sommer, U., E. Charalampous, M. Scotti and M. Moustaka-Gouni. 2018. Big fish eat small fish: implications for food chain length? Community Ecol. 19:107–115.
Stachowicz, J.J., H. Fried, R.W. Osman and R.B. Whitlatch. 2002. Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590.
Valenzuela-Quiñonez, F., F. Galván-Magaña, D.A. Ebert and E.A. Aragón-Noriega. 2017. Feeding habits and trophic level of the shovelnose guitarfish (Pseudobatos productus) in the upper Gulf of California. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 1–10.
Williams, R.J. and N.D. Martinez. 2000. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404:180–183.
Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, F. Micheli, S.R. Palumbi, E. Sala, et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787–790.
Worm, B., H.K. Lotze and U. Sommer. 2000. Coastal food web structure, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 339–349.
Worm, B., R. Hilborn, J.K. Baum, T.A. Branch, J.S. Collie, C. Costello, M.J. Fogarty, E.A. Fulton, J.A. Hutchings, S. Jennings, O.P. Jensen et al. 2009. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578–585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gilabert, R.O., Navia, A.F., De La Cruz-Agüero, G. et al. Body size and mobility explain species centralities in the Gulf of California food web. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 20, 149–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.2.5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.2.5