Abstract
The role and importance of interspecific competition for rodent communities have been much debated issues, with some early authors suggesting that these are important, and several recent articles suggesting the contrary. In this paper, we studied, for 14 years at a mountainous locality in central Italy, the coexistence dynamics of a two-species system (Apodemus flavicollis, Myodes glareolus) within a 1.44 ha trapping grid, by Capture-Mark-Recapture. Overall, we captured over 1000 rodents during the study period, with annual abundance ranging 2-7 individuals × ha−1. However, the density of the two species varied substantially across years and between sectors of the study plot. Thus, the distributions of the two species on the scale of the study grid were not related to one another. Density of a given species did not affect the percentage of lactating females in either A. flavicollis or M. glareolus. Individual traps differed in their rate of capture such that about 40% of traps were associated more with a particular species. Considering the spatial distribution of traps, we determined that three areas were associated with high probability of capture for only one of the two study species, two of these areas being associated to A. flavicollis and one to M. glareolus. Our analyses suggest that interspecific competition may be present at the local micro-scale, as explained by the fact that in the great majority of the cases in which a given trap was highly successful in capturing one species, it was also very unsuccessful in capturing the other species. However, manipulation experiments are needed to confirm that suggestion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CMR:
-
Capture Mark Recapture
References
Amarasekare, P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 6: 1109–1122.
Amori, G., Cristaldi, M., Fanfani, A., Solida, L. and Luiselli, L. 2010. Ecological coexistence of low-density populations of Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (Mammalia: Rodentia). Rendiconti Lincei 21(2): 171–183
Amori, G., Locasciulli, O., Tuccinardi, P. and Riga, F. 2000. Ecological structure of a population of Chlethrionomys glareolus in central Italy: an eight-year study. Pol. J. Ecol. 48: 125–132.
Amori, G. and Luiselli, L. 2011. Small mammal community structures in West Africa: a meta-analysis using null model. Afr. J. Ecol. 49: 418–430.
Amori, G. and Luiselli, L. 2013. Null model analyses of small mammal community structure in tropical islands. Trop. Ecol. 54: 23–31.
Amori, G., Panno, E. and Cristaldi, M. 1986. Preliminary observation on the nesting pattern of wild rodents of wild rodents’ in the Macchia della Manziana (Rome, Italy). Boll. Zool. 53: 369–372.
Beacham, T.D. 1979. Selectivity of avian predation in declining populations of the vole Microtus townsendii. Can. J. Zool. 57: 1767–1772.
Bergstedt, B. 1965. Distribution, reproduction, growth and dynamics of the rodent species Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber), Apodemus flavicollis (Melchior) and Apodemus sylvaticus (Linné) in south Sweden. Oikos 16: 132–161.
Bergstedt, B. 1966. Home ranges and movements of the rodent species Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber), Apodemus flavicollis (Melchior) and Apodemus sylvaticus (Linné) in southern Sweden. Oikos 17: 150–157.
Bobek, B. 1969. Survival turnover and production of small rodents in a beech forest. Acta Theriologica 18: 403–434.
Bobek, B. 1973. Net production of small rodents in a deciduous forest. Acta Theriologica 21: 403–434.
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1928. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzügeder Vegetationskunde. Biologische Studienbücher 7. 1. Ed. J. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Canova, L. 1993. Resource partitioning between the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus and the wood mouse Apodemus sylvati-cus in woodland habitats. Boll. Zool. 60: 193–198.
Canova, L. and Fasola, M. 1991. Communities of small mammals in six biotopes of northern Italy. Acta Theriologica 36:73–86.
Canova, L. and Fasola, M. 1993. Food habits and trophic relationships of small mammals in six habitats of the northern Po plain (Italy). Mammalia 57: 189–199.
Case, T.J. and Taper, M. 2000. Interspecific competition, environmental gradients, gene flow and the coevolution of species borders. Am. Nat. 155: 583–605.
Chesson, P. 2000. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor. Pop. Biol. 58: 211–237.
Connell, J.H. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122: 661–696.
Connor, E.F. and Bowers, M.A. 1987. The spatial consequences of interspecific competition. Ann. Zool. Fenn 24: 213–226.
Döhle, H.J., Stubbe, M., Lange, U. and Altner, H.J. 1984. Zur Dominanz-und Abundanzdynamic von Kleinnagern (Rodentia: Arvicolidae: Muridae) in Auwäldern der mittleren DDR. Säugetierkd. Inf. 2: 115–136.
Douglass, R.J. 1976. Spatial interactions and habitat selections of two locally sympatric voles, Microtus montanus and Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ecology 57: 346–352.
Eccard, J.A. and Ylonen, H. 2002. Direct interference or indirect exploitation? An experimental study of fitness costs of interspecific competition in voles. Oikos 99:580–590.
Fabbri, S. 1989. Studio sulla struttura ecologica di popolazioni sim-patriche di Clethrionomys glareolus e di Apodemus flavicollis (Mammalia, Rodentia) in Italia centrale. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, pp. 115.
Fasola, M. and Canova, L. 2000. Asymmetrical competition between the bank vole and the wood mouse, a removal experiment. Acta Theriologica 45: 353–365.
Flowerdew, J.R., Gurnell, J. and Gipps, J.H.V. 1985. The Ecology of Woodland Rodents Bank Voles and Wood Mice. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Friggens, M.M. and Brown, J.H. 2005. Niche partitioning in the ces-tode communities of two elasmobranchs. Oikos 108:76–84.
Galindo, C. and Krebs, C.J. 1985. Habitat use and abundance of deer mice: interactions with meadow voles and red-backed voles. Can. J. Zool. 63:1870–1879.
Geuse, P. 1985. Spatial microhabitat of bank voles and wood mice in a forest in central Belgium. Acta Zool. Fennica 173: 61–64.
Geuse, P. and Bauchau, V. 1985. Apodemus sylvaticus et Clethrionomys glareolus: competition or coexistence? Annals Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 2: 221–230.
Gliwicz, J. 1988. Seasonal dispersal in non-cyclic populations of Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. Acta Theriologica 33: 263–272.
Gliwicz, J. and Rajska-Jurgiel, E. 1983. Social organization (of the ecology of the bank vole). Acta Theriologica 28 (supplement 1): 134–140.
Gotelli, N.J. and Entsminger, G.L. 2001. Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the Knight’s Tour. Oecologia 129:281–291.
Gotelli, N.J. and Graves, G.R. 1996. Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Insitution Press, Washington D.C.
Grant, P.R. 1972. Interspecific competition among rodents. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:79–106.
Griffiths, R.A., Edgar, P.V. and Wong, A.L.C. 1991. Interspecific competition in tadpoles: growth inhibition and growth retrieval in natterjack toads, Bufo calamita. J. Anim. Ecol. 60:1065–1076.
Grüm, L. and Bujalska, G. 2000. Bank voles and yellow-necked mice: what are interrelations between them? Polish J. Ecology 48 (supplement):141–145.
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L., Wallace, A. and Walsh, J.S. 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 140:539-572.
Gurnell, J. 1985. Woodland rodent communities. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 55: 377-411.
Gurnell, J. and Flowerdew, J.R. 1982. Live Trapping Small Mammals. A practical guide, 2nd Edition. The Mammal Society, London.
Healing, T.D., Jewell, V.T., Jewell, P.A., Rowlands, I.W. and Gibbs, J.H.W. 1983. Populations of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glare-olus) and the long-tiled field mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) on Skomer Island, Dyfed. J. Zool. (London) 199: 447–460.
Kikkawa, J. 1964. Movement, activity and distribution of the small rodents Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus sylvaticus in woodland. J. Anim. Ecol., 33:259–299.
Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology, 2nd Edition. Benjamin Cummings Press, New York.
Jones, M., Mandelik, Y. and Dayan, T. 2001. Coexistence of temporally partitioned spiny mice: roles of habitat structure and foraging behaviour. Ecology 82: 2164–2176.
Kozakiewicz, M., Gortat, T., Kozakiewicz, A. and Barkowska, M. 1999. Effect of habitat fragmentation on four rodent species in a Polish farm landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 14: 391–400.
Le Boulengé-Nguyen, P.Y. and Le Boulengé, E. 1986. A new ear tag for small mammals. J.Zool. (London) 52: 302–304.
Lemen, C.A. and Freeman, P.W. 1986. Interference competition in a heteromyid community in the Great Basin of Nevada, USA. Oikos 46:390–396.
Luiselli, L. 2006. Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in snakes: the search for general geographic and guild patterns. Oikos 114: 193–211.
Luiselli, L. 2008. Do lizard communities partition the trophic niche? A worldwide meta-analysis using null models. Oikos 117: 321–330.
Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Amori, G., Bogdanowicz, W., Krystufek, B., Reijnders, P.J.H., Spitzenberger, F., Stubbe, M., Thissen, J.B.M., Vohralik, V. and Zima, J. 1999. Atlas of European Mammals. The Academic Press, London.
Montgomery, W.I. 1979. Seasonal variation in numbers of Apodemus sylvaticus, A. flavicollis and Clethrionomys glareolus. J. Zool. (London) 188: 283–286.
Montgomery, W.I. 1980a. The use of arboreal runways by the woodland rodents, Apodemus sylvaticus (L.), A. flavicollis (Melchior) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber). Mammal Review 10: 189–195.
Montgomery, W.I. 1980b. Population structure and dynamics of sympatric Apodemus species (Rodentia: Muridae). J. Zool. (London) 192: 351–377.
Montgomery, W.I. 1980c. Spatial organization in sympatric populations of Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (Rodentia, Muridae). J. Zool. (London) 192: 379–401.
Morris, D.W. 1984. Patterns and scale of habitat use in two temperate-zone, small mammal faunas. Can. J. Zool. 62: 1540–1547.
Morris, D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362–369.
Morris, D.W. 1996. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77: 2352–2364.
Morris, D.W. 1999. A haunting legacy from isoclines: mammal coexistence and the ghost of competition. J. Mammal. 80: 375–384
Morris, D.W. 2000. Habitat-dependent competition and the coexistence of Australian heathland rodents. Oikos 91: 294–306.
Pignatti, S. 2011. Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna.
Pirola, A. 1970. Elementi di fitosociologia. Editrice Clueb, Milan.
Pucek, Z., Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B. and Pucek, M. 1993. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Bialowieza National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica 38: 199–232.
Rico, A., Kindlmann, P. and Sedlacek, F. 2007. Road crossing in bank voles and yellow-necked mice. Acta Theriologica 52: 85–94.
Schmitt, R.J. and Holbrook, S.I. 1986. Seasonally fluctuating resources and temporal variability of interspecific competition. Oecologia 69: 1–11.
Schoener, T.W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122: 240–285.
Schradin, C. 2005. Nest-site competition in two diurnal rodents from the Succulent Karoo of South Africa. J. Mammal. 86: 757–762.
Scott, D.E. and Dueser, R.D. 1992. Habitat use by insular populations of Mus and Peromyscus: What is the role of competition? J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 329–338.
Stapp, P. 1997. Community structure of shortgrass-prairie rodents : Competition or risk of intraguild predation? Ecology 78: 1519– 1530.
Yom-Tov, Y. and Dayan, T. 1996. Body mass overlap and interspecific interference competition among desert gerbils? Oikos 75: 536–538.
Yoshimoto, J., Kakutani, T. and Nishida, T. 2007. Do battles lead to coexistence? Role of interference competition in structuring the insect community on fermented tree sap. Ecological Entomology 32: 552–558.
Walter, G.H., Hulley, P.E. and Craig, A.J.F.K. 1996. Speciation, adaptation and interspecific competition. Oikos 43:246–248.
Watts, H.E. and Holekamp, K.E. 2008. Interspecific competition influences reproduction in spotted hyenas. Journal of Zoology 276: 402–410.
White, G.C. and Burnham, K.P. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 (Supplement): 120-138.
Wojcik, J. M. and Wolk, K. 1985. The daily activity rhythm of two competitive rodents Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. Acta Theriologica 30: 241–258.
Wolff, J.O. and Dueser, R.D. 1986. Noncompetitive coexistence between Peromyscus species and Clethrionomys gapperi. Canadian Field Naturalist 100: 186–191.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
42974_2015_1602196_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Appendix 1. Relative probability of occurrence of a non-random spatial partitioning of the captures of the two rodent species along the trap-grid by size class and by year. Size classes are expressed in Roman numbers (for more details, see text). Symbols: A = Apodemus, M = Myodes.
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Amori, G., Castigliani, V., Locasciulli, O. et al. Long-term density fluctuations and microhabitat use of sympatric Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus in central Italy. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 16, 196–205 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.7