Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Sugar Biomarkers in Methanol Root Extracts of Asparagus Species by High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Original Research Papers
  • Published:
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study is a first attempt to present a report about a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)—densitometric method that has been developed and validated for the quantification of sugars, i.e., glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, and raffinose from the methanol extracts of roots of 7 Asparagus species — A. adscendens, A. racemosus, A. retrofractus, A. officinalis, A. densiflorus, A. falcatus, and A. sprengeri. The separation and quantification of sugars were achieved using the mobile phase propanolethyl acetate — water (6:3:1, v/v). Derivatization of the bands was done by using diphenylamine, aniline, and ortho-phosphoric acid reagents, and densitometric scanning was done at 600 nm in absorbance—reflectance mode. This method gave the best resolution of bands at RF = 0.55, 0.50, 0.31, 0.11, and 0.46, corresponding to fructose, glucose, maltose, raffinose, and sucrose, respectively. The calibration curves were linear in the range of 100–500 ng per spot. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged between 12.77–75.48 ng and 38.69–228.73 ng, respectively. The intra-and inter-day precisions were found between 0.33–1.46 in terms of relative standard deviation (RSD). The average recoveries ranged between 97.84–99.91%. The validated method was successfully used to detect and quantify sugars in the methanol root extracts of the 7 Asparagus species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Velaven, K. Nagulendran, R. Mahesh, V.H. Begum Pharmacogn. Rev., 1 (2007) 350–360.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kanno, J. Yokoyama, in: C. Kole (ed.), Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources – Vegetables, Springer, New York, NY, 2011, pp. 23–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. K.D. Prabakaran, R. Vadivu, N. Jayshree I nt. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., 2 (2015) 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Singh, B. Sinha Asian J. Biochem. Pharm. Res., 4 (2014) 230–240.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Negi, P. Singh, G.P. Joshi, M.S. Rawat, V.K. Bisht Pharmacogn. Rev., 4 (2010) 215–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Singh, V.P. Rai, M. Singh, A.K. Singh, B. Sinha J. Med. Plants Res., 7 (2013) 1050–1056.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. P.Y. Hayes, A.H. Jahidin, R. Lehmann, K. Penman, W. Kitching, J.J. De Voss Tetrahedron Lett., 47 (2006) 8683–8687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Shiomi New Phytol., 122 (1992) 421–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Benkeblia, N. Yoshida, Y. Ooi, T. Nagamine, S. Onodera, N. Shiomi Acta Horti., 776 (2008) 459–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W.E. Cake, H.H. Bartlett J. Biol. Chem., 51 (1922) 93–102.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Krzesiński, M. Gqsecka, J. Stachowiak, M. Knafl ewski, Folia Horti. 20/2 (2008a) 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Krzesiński, M. Gqsecka, J. Stachowiak, A. Zurawicz, M. Knaflewski, P. Goliński, Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 7 (2008b) 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Aberoumand Nutr. Food Sci. Res., 1 (2014) 57–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Pressman, A. Schaff er, D. Compton, E. Zamski J. Plant Physiol., 143 (1994) 621–624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P.K. Bhowmik, T. Matsui Asian J. Plant Sci., 2 (2003) 891–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Gqsecka, J. Stachowiak, W. Krzesiński, M. Knafl ewski, P. Goliński Veg. Crops Res. Bull., 69 (2008) 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.P. Hewawasam, K.A.P.W. Jayatilaka, C. Pathirana J. Diet. Suppl., 5 (2018) 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Khan, M. Nisar, N. Khan, M. Saeed, S. Nadeem, F. Rehman, F. Ali, N. Karim, W.A. Kaleem, M. Qayum, H. Ahmad, I.A. Khan Fitoterapia, 81 (2010) 1020–1025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R.M. Ghalib, R. Hashim, O. Sulaiman, S.H. Mehdi, A. Valkonen, K. Rissanen, S.R. Trifunović, M.B.K. Ahamed, A.M.S.A. Majid, F. Kawamura Eur. J. Med. Chem., 47 (2012) 601–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Pahwa, R.K. Goel Chem. Biol. Interact., 260 (2016) 208–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. KM. Khan, L. Nahar, A. Mannan, M. Arfan, G.A. Khan, A. Al-Groshi, A. Evans, N.M. Dempster, F.M.D. Ismail, S.D. Sarker Pharmacogn. Mag., 13 (2017) S890–S894.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Validation of analytical procedure: methodology Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), Geneva, 1996.

  23. L. Dinan, T. Savchenko, P. Whiting Phytochemistry, 56 (2001) 569–576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.M.F. Alventosa, J.M.M. Rojas, in: V., Preedy (ed.) Processing and Impact on Active Components in Food, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston, 2015, pp. 103–110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Q. Zhao, B. Xie, J. Yan, F. Zhao, J. Xiao, L. Yao, B. Zhao, Y. Huang Carbohydr. Polym., 87 (2012) 392–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooja Mawal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kapoor, M., Gupta, R.C., Mawal, P. et al. Determination of Sugar Biomarkers in Methanol Root Extracts of Asparagus Species by High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography. JPC-J Planar Chromat 32, 109–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/1006.2019.32.2.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/1006.2019.32.2.5

Key Words

Navigation