Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the floodplain forest floristic composition of two riparian corridors: species richness, alien species and the effect of water regime changes

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floodplain forests are sensitive to changes within the surrounding environment and contain the most highly invaded habitats. The overall aim of this study was to characterise floristic composition of floodplain forest along two different riparian corridors. The studied river ecosystems were influenced by human disturbances, but they have historically different hydrological management practices (e.g., damming and water regime management). We hypothesised that different hydrological management practices affect the composition and diversity of vegetation and influence multiple ecosystem functions and services in floodplain forests. A detailed study of the vascular plant species diversity of floodplain forests in the lower parts of two riparian corridors of the Thaya and Morava Rivers (South Moravia) was conducted. Altogether, 853 species of vascular plants were recorded, including 121 species of woody plants. We found 111 species that are protected by law or threatened according to the Czech Red List. We found 230 alien species, out of which 125 are archaeophytes and 105 are neophytes. Thirty-nine species are invasive; however, the most frequent group comprises naturalised archaeophytes (78). Differences in the effects of environmental factors on species richness and the proportions of alien and endangered species were tested using generalised linear models (GLMs). Differences in species composition in the two distinct riparian corridors were examined using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Although only small differences were observed in the vegetation composition, we observed some differences in species richness and species composition between the riparian corridors. The most obvious difference was a higher proportion of alien species in the Morava River corridor than in the Thaya River corridor. In contrast, the proportion of endangered species richness was higher in the Thaya River corridor. We assume that the most probable explanation of the differences is the unique water management history for each river corridor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amanda L., Uowolo A.L., Binkley D. & Adair E.C. 2005. Plant diversity in riparian forests in northwest Colorado: Effects of time and river regulation. Forest Ecol. Manag. 218: 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archaux F., Chevalier R. & Berthelot A. 2010. Towards practices favourable to plant diversity in hybrid poplar plantations. Forest Ecol. Manag. 259: 2410–2417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedeltje G., Bakker J.P., Brinke A.T., Van Groenendael J.M. & Soesbergen M. 2004. Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relations to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported. J. Ecol. 92: 786–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer J.S. 2010. A Potential Conflict between Preserving Regional Plant Diversity and Biotic Resistance to an Invasive Grass, Microstegium vimineum. Nat. Areas J. 30: 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmura D. & Sierka E. 2006. Relation between invasive plant and species richness of forest floor vegetation: A study of Impatiens parviflora DC. Polish J. Ecol. 54: 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M. & Otýpková Z. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. J. Veget. Sci. 14: 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M., Tichý L., Holt J. & Botta-Dukát Z. 2002. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Tichý L., Knollová I. & Danihelka J. 2005. Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77: 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M., Jarošík V., Pyšek P., Hájek O., Knollová I., Tichý L. & Danihelka J. 2008. Separating habitat invasibility by alien species from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89: 1541–1553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M., Kučera T., Kočí M., Grulich V. & Lustyk P. (eds) 2010. Katalog biotopů České republiky [Habitat catalogue of the Czech Republic], Ed. 2. AOPK, Praha, 445 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark I. & Harper W.V. 2000. Practical Geostatistics. Ecosse North Amer Llc., 442 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čermák J., Kučera J., Prax A., Bednářová E., Tatarinov F. & Nadyezhdin V. 2001. Long-term course of transpiration in a floodplain forest in southern Moravia associated with changes of underground water table. Ecológia 20 (Suppl. 1): 92–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danihelka J. & Grulich V. (eds) 1996. Výsledky floristického kurzu v Břeclavi (1995) [The results of the floristic course in Břeclav town]. Zpr. Čes. Bot. Společ. 31 (Suppl.): 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danihelka J., Grulich V., Šumberová K., Řepka R., Husák Š. & Čáp J. 1995. O rozšíření některých cévnatých rostlin na nejjižnější Moravě [The distribution of some vascular plants in southern Moravia]. Zpr. Čes. Bot. Společ. 30 (Suppl.): 29–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danihelka J. & Šumberová K. 2004. O rozšíření některých cévnatých rostlin na nejjižnější Moravě II [The distribution of some vascular plants in southern Moravia, part II]. Příroda 21: 117–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M. A., Grime J. P. & Thompson K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Ecology 88: 528–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ferrari C.M. & Naiman R.J. 1994. A multi-scale assessment of the occurrence of exotic plants on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demek J. & Mackovčin P. 2006. Zeměpisný lexikon ČR. Hory a nížiny. Ed. 2. vyd. AOPK, Praha, 582 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengler J., Chytrý M. & Ewald J. 2008. Phytosociology, pp. 2767–2779. In: Jørgensen S.E. & Fath B.D. (eds), Encyclopedia of ecology, Elsevier, Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grulich V. 2012. Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. Preslia 84: 631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris M. B., Tomas W., Mourao G., Da Silva C. J., Guimaraes E., Sonoda F. & Fachim E. 2005. Safeguarding the Pantanal wetlands: threats and conservation initiatives. Conserv. Biol. 19: 714–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood G.W. & Naiman R.J. 2000. Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic vascular plant species. Plant Ecol. 148: 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horák J. 1961. South-Moravian floodplain forests (Typological study). Ph.D. thesis. University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, 266 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrib M. & Kordiovský E. (eds) 2004. Lužní les v Dyjsko-moravské nivě. Moraviapress, Břeclav, 591 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlička J. & Prach K. 2006. A comparison of two North-American asters invading in central Europe. Flora 201: 652–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimo E., Maděra P. & Kulhavý J. 2008. Floodplain forest of Southern Moravia, pp. 382–396. In: Klimo E., Hager H., Matič S., Anič I. & Kulhavý J. (eds), Floodplain forests of the temperate zone of Europe. Lesnická práce, Kostelec nad Černými lesy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J. jr., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (eds) 2002. Klíč ke květeně České republiky. Academia, Praha, 927 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon J. & Gross N.M. 2005. Patterns of plant diversity and plant–environmental relationships across three riparian corridors. Forest Ecol. Manag. 204: 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon J. & Sagers C.L. 1998. Structure of herbaceous plant assemblages in a forested riparian landscape. Plant Ecol. 138: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maděra, P., Šebesta, J., Řepka, R., Klimánek, M. (2011): Vascular plants distribution as a tool for adaptive forest management of floodplain forests in the Dyje river basin. J. Landsc. Ecol. 4: 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maděra P., Řepka R., Šebesta J., Koutecký T. & Klimánek M. 2013. Vascular plants diversity of floodplain forest geobiocoenosis in Lower Morava river basin (Forest district Tvrdonice), Czech Republic. J. Landsc. Ecol. 6: 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee T.K., Ringold P.L. & Bollman M.A. 2008. Alien species importance in native vegetation along wadeable streams, John Day River basin, Oregon, USA. Plant Ecol. 195: 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLane C.R., Battaglia L.L., Gibson D.J. & Groninger J.W. 2012. Succession of Exotic and Native Species Assemblages within Restored Floodplain Forests: A Test of the Parallel Dynamics Hypothesis. Rest. Ecol. 20: 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Měkotová J. 2008. Biodiverzita v říční krajině, pp. 238–252. In: Štěrba O., Měkotová J., Šarapatka B., Rychnovská M., Kubíček F. & Řehořek V., Říční krajina a její ekosystémy. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Měkotová J., Šarapatka B., Štěrba O. & Harper D. 2006. Restoration of a river landscape: biotopes as a basis for quantification of species diversity and evaluation of landscape quality.–Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. Lett. 6: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklín J. & Čížek L. 2014. Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: Open woodlands, veterantrees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. J. Nat. Conserv. 22: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölder A. & Schneider E. 2011. On the beautiful diverse Danube? Danubian floodplain forest vegetation and flora under the influence of river eutrophication. River Res. Appl. 27: 881–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman R.J. & Decamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 621–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman R.J., Decamps H. & Mc Clain M.E. 2005. Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities. Elsevier/Academic Press, New York, 448 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman R. J., Decamps H. & Pollock M. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 3: 209–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paal J., Rannik R., Jeletsky E.M. & Prieditis N. 2007. Floodplain forests in Estonia: Typological diversity and growth conditions. Folia Geobot. 42: 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penka M., Vyskot M., Klimo E. & Vašíček F. (eds) 1985 and 1991. Floodplain forest ecosystem. Vol. 1 & 2. Academia, Praha, 466 & 632 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrášová M., Jarolímek I. & Medvecká J. 2013. Neophytes in Pannonian hardwood floodplain forests–History, present situation and trends. Forest Ecol. Manag. 308: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planty-Tabacchi A., Tabacchi E., Naiman R.J., De Ferrari C.M. & Decamps H. 1996. Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones. Biol. Conserv. 10: 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prax A. 1980: Studying the water cycle and soil water content dynamics in forest and substitute ecosystems of the floodplain and upland areas. Research report, University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, 119 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle L.L. 1995. Effects of disturbance on herbaceous exotic plant species on the floodplain of the Potomac River. Amer. Midl. Natur. 134: 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P., Bacher S., Chytrý M., Jarošík V., Wild J., Celesti-Grapow L., Gassó N., Kenis M., Lambdon P. W., Nentwig W., Pergl J., Roques A., Sádlo J., Solarz W., Vilà M. & Hulme P.E. 2010. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P. & Prach K. 1993. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. J. Biogeogr. 20: 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P. & Prach K. 1994. How important are rivers for supporting plant invasions? pp. 19–26. In: De Waal L.C., Child L.E., Wade P.M. & Brock J.H. (eds), Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P., Danihelka J., Sádlo J., Chrtek J., Chytrý M., Jarošík V., Kaplan Z., Krahulec F., Moravcová L., Pergl J., Štajerová K. & Tichý L. 2012a. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84: 155–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P., Chytrý M., Pergl J., Sádlo J. & Wild J. 2012b: Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. Preslia 84: 575–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitt E. 1975. Mapa klimatických oblastí ČSR. Geografický ústav ČSAV, Brno, mapa v měřítku 1: 500 000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D., Holmes P.M., Elser K.J., Galatowitsch S.M., Stromberg J.C., Kirkman S.P., Pyšek P. & Hobbs R. J. 2007. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers. Distrib. 13: 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Růžičková H., Banásová V. & Kalivoda H. 2004. Morava River alluvial meadows on the Slovak–Austrian border (Slovak part): plant community dynamics, floristic and butterfly diversity–threats and management. J. Nat. Conserv. 12: 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Řepka R. & Maděra P. 2009. Rozšíření zavlečených druhů v nížin-ných luzích jižní Moravy–případ hvězdnice kopinaté Aster lanceolatus, pp. 100–105. In: Měkotová J. (ed.), Sborník příspěvků z konference Olomouc 2009, Univerzita Palackého, Olomouc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccone P., Brun J.J. & Michalet R. 2010. Challenging growth-survival trade-off: A key for Acer negundo invasion in European floodplains? Canad. J. Forest Res. 40: 1879–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 1997. River dynamics as a forest process: interaction between fluvial systems and alluvial forests in large European river plains. Bot. Rev. 63: 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A., Hale B.W. & Alsum E. M. 2007. Examining native and exotic species diversity in European riparian forests. Biol. Conserv. 138: 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schratt-Ehrendorfer L. 1999. Zur Flora und Vegetation des österreichischen March- und Thaya-Tales, pp. 181–202. In: Fließende Grenzen. Lebensraum March-Thaya-Auen. Umweltbundesamt, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalický V. 1988. Regionálně fytogeografické členění, pp. 103–121. In: Hejný S. & Slavík B. (eds), Květena České republiky, vol. 1, Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T.J., Bull K.A., Otsuki Y., Villa C.A. & Lee M. 1998. Riparian zones are havens for exotic plant species in the central grasslands. Pl. Ecol. 138: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štěrba O., Měkotová J., Šarapatka B., Rychnovská M., Kubíček F. & Řehořek V. 2008. Říční krajina a její ekosystémy. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc, 391 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi E., Planty-Tabacchi A.M., Salinas M.J. & Decamps H. 1996. Landscape structure and diversity in riparian plant communities: a longitudinal comparative study. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manag. 12: 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J. W., Maser C. & Rodiek J. E. 1979. Wildlife habitats in managed forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv., Agric. Handb. 553, Washington DC, 512 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremoliéres M., Sanchez-Perez J.M., Schnitzler A. & Schmitt D. 1998. Impact of river management history on the community structure, species composition and nutrient status in the Rhine alluvial hardwood forest. Plant Ecol. 135: 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verry E.S., Hornbeck J.W. & Dolloff C.A. (eds) 2000. Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United States. Lewis Publishers, New York, 432 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicherek J., Antonín V., Danihelka J., Grulich V., Gruna B., Hradílek Z., Řehořek V., Šumberová K., Vampola P. & Vágner A. 2000. Flóra a vegetace na soutoku Moravy a Dyje. Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 368 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B., Joseph K.A., Largay E.F. & Lohnes R.G. 2006. Faciliation between the introduced nitrogen-fixing tree, Robinia pseudacacia, and nonnative plant species in the glacial outwash upland ecosystem of Cape Cod. MA. Biodiv. Conserv. 15: 2197–2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter J., Ess F., Englisch T. & Kiehn M. 2005. Neophytes in Austria: Habitat preferences and ecological effects. Neobiota 6: 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J.V., Tockner K., Arscott D.B. & Claret C. 2002. Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biol. 47: 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams Ch.E. 2010. Survey of the alien flora of the Allegheny River island wilderness, Pennsylvania. Rhodora 112 (950): 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results were achieved thanks to financial support from the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology and the project of the National Agency for Agriculture Research entitled “Harmonization of forest management in lowland alluvia as a tool to preserve species diversity of vascular plants” (reg. no. QI92A031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of the Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology and Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, CZ-61300, Brno, Czech Republic

    Radomír Řepka, Jan Šebesta, Petr Maděra & Petr Vahalík

Authors
  1. Radomír Řepka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Šebesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petr Maděra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petr Vahalík
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radomír Řepka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Řepka, R., Šebesta, J., Maděra, P. et al. Comparison of the floodplain forest floristic composition of two riparian corridors: species richness, alien species and the effect of water regime changes. Biologia 70, 208–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0021

Key words

Search

Navigation