Skip to main content
Log in

Overtreating Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Reviews
  • Published:
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of frailty in older persons is not easy, implying interventions beyond the simple prescription of medications. Biological complexity, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and social issues often hamper the possibility to directly translate the evidence coming from research into clinical practice. Frailty indeed represents the most relevant cause of the “evidence-based medicine issue” influencing clinical decisions in geriatric care. Today, patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are much older and frailer than some decades ago. They also tend to have more drugs prescribed. In parallel, research on AD has evolved over the years, hypothesizing that anticipating the interventions to the earliest stages of the disease may provide beneficial effects (to date, still lacking). In this article, we argue that, by focusing exclusively on “the disease” and pushing to anticipate its detection (sometimes even before the appareance of its clinical manifestations) may overshadow the person’s values and priorities. Research should be developed for better integrating the concept of aging and frailty in the design of clinical trials in order to provide results that can be implemented in real life. On the other hand, clinicians should be less prone to the easy (but unsupported by evidence) pharmacological prescription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Kerimel J, Tavassoli N, Lafont C, et al. How to Manage Frail Older Adults in the Community? Proposal of a Health Promotion Program Experienced in a City of 16,638 Inhabitants in France. J Frailty Aging. 2018;7(2):120–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinclair AJ, Abdelhafiz A, Dunning T, et al. An International Position Statement on the Management of Frailty in Diabetes Mellitus: Summary of Recommendations 2017. J Frailty Aging. 2018;7(1):10–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cesari M, Marzetti E, Thiem U, et al. The geriatric management of frailty as paradigm of “The end of the disease era”. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31:11–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Negm AM, Kennedy CC, Thabane L, et al. Management of Frailty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20(10):1190–1198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muscedere J. The Need to Implement Frailty in the International Classification of Disease (ICD). J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(1):2–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2020.2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balducci L. Evidence-based or evidence-biased medicine? J Med Pers. 2013;11:99–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans J. Evidence-based and evidence-biased medicine. Age Ageing. 1995;24(6):461–463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Canevelli M, Remoli G, Toccaceli Blasi M, et al. Ongoing Research Protocols for the Pharmacological Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia. J Frailty Aging. Published online July 7, 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2020.36

  9. Guralnik J, Bandeen-Roche K, Bhasin S A. R, et al. Clinically Meaningful Change for Physical Performance: Perspectives of the ICFSR Task Force. J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(1):9–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2019.33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fried TR, Street RL, Cohen AB. Chronic Disease Decision Making and “What Matters Most”. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(3):474–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Renne I, Gobbens RJ. Effects of frailty and chronic diseases on quality of life in Dutch community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:325–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S156116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cesari M, Pérez-Zepeda M, Marzetti E. Frailty and multimorbidity: different ways of thinking about geriatrics. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(4):361–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Canevelli M, Bruno G, Remiddi F, et al. Spontaneous Reversion of Clinical Conditions Measuring the Risk Profile of the Individual: From Frailty to Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:184. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cesari M. Frailty and Aging. J Frailty Aging. 2012;1:3–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cesari M, Vellas B, Gambassi G. The stress of aging. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(4):451–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2012.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiiti Borges M, Oiring De Castro Cezar N, Silva Santos Siqueira A, Yassuda M, Cesari M, Aprahamian I. The relationship between physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: a systematic review. J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(4):192–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/JFA.2019.29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maltais M, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y, Vellas B. The Association of ApoE ε4 Status with Lower Limb Function and Handgrip Strength in Older Adults. J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(2):62–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2019.7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Muth C, Blom JW, Smith SM, et al. Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus. J Intern Med. 2019;285(3):272–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12842

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Snyder Sulmasy L, Weinberger SE. Better care is the best defense: high-value clinical practice vs defensive medicine. Cleve Clin J Med. 2014;81(8):464–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.81a.14037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dam A, Datta N, Mohanty U, Khanna P. Pharmaceutically Less and Holistically More. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(11):948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Canevelli M, Cesari M, Trobia F, et al. Sociodemographic and Clinical Changes Over Time of Individuals Evaluated for Cognitive Disturbances: Good or Bad News. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(12):1095–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arce Rentería M, Vonk JMJ, Felix G, et al. Illiteracy, dementia risk, and cognitive trajectories among older adults with low education. Neurology. 2019;93(24):e2247–e2256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen R. Clinical trials for early (pre-dementia) Alzheimer’s disease: a case for mild cognitive impairment. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(4):304–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(6):614–629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jessen F, Amariglio R, van Boxtel M, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(6):844–852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McGregor MJ, Martin D. Testing 1, 2, 3: is overtesting undermining patient and system health? Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(11):1191–1193, e615–617.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yassine HN. Targeting prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: too late for prevention? Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):946–947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30372-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mattsson N, Brax D, Zetterberg H. To know or not to know: ethical issues related to early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/841941

  29. Howe EG. Ethical Issues in Diagnosing and Treating Alzheimer Disease. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006;3(5):43–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Galvin JE. Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment: There is the Will but Is There a Way? J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(3):144–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Egan MF, Kost J, Voss T, et al. Randomized Trial of Verubecestat for Prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(15):1408–1420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Canevelli M, Grande G, Lacorte E, et al. Spontaneous Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. Published online August 5, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.06.020

  33. Raschetti R, Albanese E, Vanacore N, Maggini M. Cholinesterase inhibitors in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):e338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider LS, Insel PS, Weiner MW. Treatment With Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine of Patients in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(1):58–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Archibald M, Kitson A, Frewin D, Visvanathan R. Transdisciplinary Research In Frailty: Knowledge Translation To Inform New Models of Care. J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(2):62–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rowe J, Fried L. Incorporating frailty into clinical practice and clinical research. J Frailty Aging. 2013;2(3):126–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2013.17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Beard JR. Linking Geroscience and Integrated Care to Reinforce Prevention. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(2):68–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Takeda C, Guyonnet S, Sumi Y, Vellas B, Araujo de Carvalho I. Integrated Care for Older People and the Implementation in the INSPIRE Care Cohort. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(2):70–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Cesari.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest: Marco Canevelli is supported by a research grant of the Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2016-02364975) for the project “Dementia in immigrants and ethnic minorities living in Italy: clinical-epidemiological aspects and public health perspectives” (ImmiDem). Matteo Cesari has received honoraria for presentations at scientific meetings and/or research funding from Nestlé. No specific conflict of interest declared by the other authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Canevelli, M., Vanacore, N., Blasimme, A. et al. Overtreating Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 8, 234–236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.74

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.74

Key words

Navigation