Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Clinical Meaningfulness of Endpoints in the Generation Program by the Insights to Model Alzheimer’s Progression in Real Life (iMAP) Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are launching the Insights to Model Alzheimer’s Progression in Real Life study in parallel with the Alzheimer Prevention Initiative Generation Program. This is a 5-year, multinational, prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional cohort study that will collect data across the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease. The primary objective is to assess the ability of the Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative Cognitive Composite Test Score and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status to predict clinically meaningful outcomes such as diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease, and change in Clinical Dementia Rating–Global Score. This study is the first large-scale, prospective effort to establish the clinical meaningfulness of cognitive test scores that track longitudinal decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. This study is also expected to contribute to our understanding of the relationships among outcomes in different stages of Alzheimer’s disease as well as models of individual trajectories during the course of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prince M, Comas-Herrera A, Knapp M, Guerchet M, Karagiannidou M. World Alzheimer Report 2016: Improving healthcare for people living with dementia - coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2016. https://doi.org/www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2016.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement 2017;13:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiman EM, Quiroz YT, Fleisher AS, et al. Brain imaging and fluid biomarker analysis in young adults at genetic risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in the presenilin 1 E280A kindred: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:1048–1056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dharmarajan TS, Gunturu SG. Alzheimer’s disease: a healthcare burden of epidemic proportion. Am Health Drug Benefits 2009;2:39–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashford JW, Mortimer JA. Non-familial Alzheimer’s disease is mainly due to genetic factors. J Alzheimers Dis 2002;4:169–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertram L, Tanzi RE. Thirty years of Alzheimer’s disease genetics: the implications of systematic meta-analyses. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:768–778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez-Isla T, West HL, Rebeck GW, et al. Clinical and pathological correlates of apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 1996;39:62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raber J, Huang Y, Ashford JW. ApoE genotype accounts for the vast majority of AD risk and AD pathology. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:641–650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonham LW, Geier EG, Fan CC, et al. Age-dependent effects of APOE epsilon4 in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3(9):668–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qian J, Wolters FJ, Beiser A, et al. APOE-related risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia for prevention trials: An analysis of four cohorts. PLoS Med. 2017;14(3):e1002254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez Lopez C, Caputo A, Liu F, Riviere ME et al. The Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative Generation Program: Evaluating CNP520 Efficacy in the Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(4):242–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR et al. The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(4):531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141:1356–1364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufer D, Cummings J, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12:233–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bédard M, Molloy DW, Squire L, Dubois S, Lever JA, O’Donnell M. The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. The gerontologist. 2001;41(5):652–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wimo A, Jonsson L, Zbrozek A. The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in communityliving patients with dementia. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2010;14(8):685–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, Lloyd A, Scalone L, Kind P, Pickard AS. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value in Health. 2012;15(5):708–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Torisson G, Stavenow L, Minthon L, Londos E. Reliability, validity and clinical correlates of the Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s disease (QoL-AD) scale in medical inpatients. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2016;14(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lloret-Villas A, Varusai TM, Juty N, et al. The impact of mathematical modeling in understanding the mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration: evolving dimensions and future directions. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017;6:73–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ritchie CW, Molinuevo JL, Truyen L, et al. Development of interventions for the secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia: the European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia (EPAD) project. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moulder KL, Snider BJ, Mills SL, Buckles VD, Santacruz AM, Bateman RJ, Morris JC. Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network: facilitating research and clinical trials. Alzheimer’s research & therapy. 2013;5(5):48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Graf.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graf, A., Risson, V., Gustavsson, A. et al. Assessment of Clinical Meaningfulness of Endpoints in the Generation Program by the Insights to Model Alzheimer’s Progression in Real Life (iMAP) Study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 6, 85–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2018.49

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2018.49

Key words

Navigation