Abstract
Background
Existing data on the histopathological correlation of testicular tumors with lymph node prognosis have been poorly explored. We aimed to investigate the relationship of the histopathological properties of testicular tumors with lymph nodes and their involvement with chemoresistance and heterogeneity of testicular tumors.
Methods
Patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) were selected for histopathological correlation of testicular tumor with lymph nodes and its relationship with chemoresistance and heterogeneity. Histopathological and radiological parameters associated with the risk of chemoresistance and tumor progression were measured pre- and post-chemotherapy. Binomial logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis were implemented to determine the predictors of progression and adverse overall patient survival. All categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, while Pearson’s R coefficient determined the correlation.
Results
Male patients who were diagnosed with NSGCT from March 2017 to December 2018 at Guwahati Medical College, Guwahati, India, were included in this study. Lymph node groups were predominantly incriminated with the EYST or EYS groups and minimally linked with the pure E and YCS groups. Furthermore, the highest number of lymph node stations was associated with pre-chemotherapy. In salvage chemotherapy in the form of VIP, we found exciting outcomes, as approximately 41% of cases responded positively, especially in the EYS group.
Conclusion
Our study classifies NSGCT according to the most favorable histopathological grouping and explores the tumoral response in different intrinsic and extrinsic variables. Our analysis can serve as a triumphant histopathological nomogram for a sublime management protocol to deal with the onerous histological pairing in NSGCT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This manuscript has data included as electronic supplementary material.
References
Baroni T, Arato I, Mancuso F, Calafiore R, Luca G. On the origin of testicular germ cell tumors: from gonocytes to testicular cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00343.
Lobo J, Gillis AJM, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Looijenga LHJ. Human germ cell tumors are developmental cancers: impact of epigenetics on pathobiology and clinic. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020258.
Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000;50(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.50.1.7.
Winter C, Zengerling F, Busch J, et al. How to classify, diagnose, treat and follow-up extragonadal germ cell tumors? A systematic review of available evidence. World J Urol. 2022;40(12):2863–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04009-z.
Tongaonkar H. Testicular cancer: current management and controversial issues. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(1):63. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60447.
International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(2):594-603. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.594
Wee CE, Gilligan TD. Management of testicular germ cell tumors. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2023;21(4):179–88.
Pratap VK, Agarwal S. Testicular neoplasms. (A review of 75 cases based on a new British classification). Indian J Cancer. 1971;8(1):40–53.
Olszewski AJ, Jakobsen LH, Collins GP, et al. Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(10):1129–38. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03288.
Bilen MA, Hess KR, Campbell MT, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity and chemoresistance in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(52):86280–9. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13380.
Tu S-M, Bilen MA, Hess KR, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity: Role of differentiation in a potentially lethal phenotype of testicular cancer. Cancer. 2016;122(12):1836–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29996.
Sheikine Y, Genega E, Melamed J, Lee P, Reuter VE, Ye H. Molecular genetics of testicular germ cell tumors. Am J Cancer Res. 2012;2(2):153–67.
Harisinghani MG, Saksena M, Ross RW, et al. A pilot study of lymphotrophic nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique in early stage testicular cancer: a new method for noninvasive lymph node evaluation. Urology. 2005;66(5):1066–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.049.
Zhang D, Chen X, Zhu D, et al. Intrapulmonary lymph node metastasis is common in clinically staged IA adenocarcinoma of the lung. Thorac Cancer. 2019;10(2):123–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12908.
De Wit R, Stoter G, Sleijfer DT, et al. Four cycles of BEP vs four cycles of VIP in patients with intermediate-prognosis metastatic testicular non-seminoma: a randomized study of the EORTC Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(6):828–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.587.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the patients who participated in this study and all research support staff and investigators. This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the Guwahati Medical College Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India, as part of their care and support. Dr. Neha Garg would like to acknowledge the seed grant under the Institute of Eminence Scheme, Banaras Hindu University, for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: YS, SKB. Data curation: YS. Formal analysis: YS, SKB, NG. Investigation: YS, SKB, VKS, ST, RTP, SRK, NG. Methodology: YS, SKB, VKS, ST, RTP, SRK, NG. Project administration: YS, SKB, NG. Software: YS. Supervision: YS, NG. Validation: YS, SKB, VKS, ST, RTP, SRK, NG. Roles/writing—original draft: YS, VKS, NG. Writing—review and editing: All authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
Yashasvi Singh, Sasanka Kumar Barua, Vipendra Kumar Singh, Sameer Trivedi, Rajeev TP, Sridhar Reddy Koti, and Neha Garg have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gauhati Medical College Hospital, Guwahati, Assam (MC/190/2007/PA-I/138). Prior consent was received from all patients who were involved in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, Y., Barua, S.K., Singh, V.K. et al. Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Chemoresistance and Lymph Node Landing Zone Prognosis in Testicular Tumors Based on Histopathological Characteristics. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 3544–3553 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15051-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15051-z