Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Use of Area-Level Socioeconomic Indices in Evaluating Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review

  • Global Health Services Research
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multiple composite indices of small-area socioeconomic characteristics have been used to examine how neighborhood characteristics influence cancer care, but there is little consensus regarding how to use them. This scoping review aimed to summarize the use of these indices in cancer literature and their association with outcomes.

Methods

A search was conducted to identify studies from 2015 to 2021 that investigated cancer incidence, disease stage at diagnosis, and mortality using area-based indices of deprivation as an independent variable. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted regarding the geospatial and statistical use of these indices.

Results

All the inclusion criteria were met by 45 studies. The area level of analysis was at the census tract level in 19 studies (42.3%), the county level in 15 studies (33.3%), the block group level in 6 studies (13.3%), and the ZIP code level in 5 studies (11.1%). Altogether, 18 unique indices were used, with 4 indices used most frequently. Of the studies that used their indices ordinally, 3 defined high and low deprivation dichotomously, 10 used tertiles, 13 used quartiles, and 15 used quintiles. Of the 45 studies, 34 (76%) showed a significant association between area deprivation and cancer-related outcomes.

Conclusions

Neighborhood deprivation indices are most commonly used at the census tract level and ordinally as quintiles. Despite variance in methods, there is a strong indication that deprived areas are at adverse odds with cancer-related outcomes. Further study investigating deprivation in the context of cancer can inform drivers of inequity and identify potential targets for care delivery and policy interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diez-Roux AV, Kiefe CI, Jacobs DR Jr, et al. Area characteristics and individual-level socioeconomic position indicators in three population-based epidemiologic studies [published correction appears in Ann Epidemiol. 2001;30:924. [Roux AV corrected to Diez-Roux]. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11:395–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:703–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Census Bureau, U. Glossary. [online] Census.gov (2022). Accessed 10 Feb 2022 at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/about/glossary.html#par_textimage_13.

  6. Singh GK. Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969–1998. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1137–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS, et al. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J Urban Health. 2006;83:1041–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Saldana-Ruiz N, Clouston SA, Rubin MS, Colen CG, Link BG. Fundamental causes of colorectal cancer mortality in the United States: understanding the importance of socioeconomic status in creating inequality in mortality. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin MS, Clouston S, Link BG. A fundamental cause approach to the study of disparities in lung cancer and pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2014;100:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kind AJH, Buckingham W. Making neighborhood disadvantage metrics accessible: the neighborhood atlas. N Engl Jl Med. 2018;378:2456–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Atsdr.cdc.gov. 2015. CDC/ATSDR’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). [online] Accessed 15 Aug 2021 at https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html.

  12. SEER. n.d. Census Tract-level SES and Rurality Database—SEER*Stat. [online] Accessed 15 Aug 2021 at https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/databases/census-tract/index.html.

  13. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1386–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005;8:19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu M, Tatalovich Z, Gibson JT, Cronin KA. Using a composite index of socioeconomic status to investigate health disparities while protecting the confidentiality of cancer registry data. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25:81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pruitt SL, Shim MJ, Mullen PD, Vernon SW, Amick BC III. Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18:2579–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jayasekera J, Onukwugha E, Cadham C, et al. An ecological approach to monitor geographic disparities in cancer outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0218712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Song S, Duan Y, Huang J, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in premature cancer mortality among U.S. counties during 1999 to 2018. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2021;30:1375–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chakravarthy R, Stallings SC, Velez Edwards DR, et al. Determinants of stage at diagnosis of HPV-related cancer including area deprivation and clinical factors. J Public Health Oxford. 2022;44:18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wheeler DC, Czarnota J, Jones RM. Estimating an area-level socioeconomic status index and its association with colonoscopy screening adherence. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Meliker JR, Jacquez GM, Goovaerts P, Copeland G, Yassine M. Spatial cluster analysis of early-stage breast cancer: a method for public health practice using cancer registry data. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1061–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9312-4. (Epub 15 February 2009. PMID: 19219634; PMCID: PMC4337842).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kind AJ, Jencks S, Brock J, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:765–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortiz AG, Wiese D, Sorice KA, et al. Liver cancer incidence and area-level geographic disparities in Pennsylvania: a geo-additive approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Krieger N, Waterman PD, Spasojevic J, Li W, Maduro G, Van Wye G. Public health monitoring of privilege and deprivation with the index of concentration at the extremes. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:256–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Siegel J, Engelhardt KE, Hornor MA, Morgan KA, Lancaster WP. Travel distance and its interaction with patient and hospital factors in pancreas cancer care. Am J Surg. 2021;221:819–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.023. (Epub 25 August 2020 PMID: 32891396).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Siegel JB, Allen S, Engelhardt KE, Morgan KA, Lancaster WP. Travel distance and overall survival in hepatocellular cancer care. Am J Surg. 2021;222:584–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.052. (Epub 31 December 2020 PMID: 33413878).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fong AJ, Lafaro K, Ituarte PHG, Fong Y. Association of living in urban food deserts with mortality from breast and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:1311–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09049-6. (Epub 25 August 2020. PMID: 32844294; PMCID: PMC8046424).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fay KA, Maeder ME, Emond JA, Hasson RM, Millington TM, Finley DJ, Phillips JD. Residing in a food desert is associated with an increased risk of readmission following esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14:1854–68. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1637.PMID:35813712;PMCID:PMC9264063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF. Changing area socioeconomic patterns in U.S. cancer mortality, 1950–1998: part II–lung and colorectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:916–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.12.916. (PMID: 12072545).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang HY, Hatef E, Ma X, Weiner JP, Kharrazi H. Impact of Area Deprivation Index on the performance of claims-based risk-adjustment models in predicting health care costs and utilization. Popul Health Manage. 2021;24:403–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2020.0135. (Epub 10 September 2020 PMID: 33434448).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghirimoldi FM, Schmidt S, Simon RC, Wang CP, Wang Z, Brimhall BB, et al. Association of socioeconomic Area Deprivation Index with hospital readmissions after colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:795–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04754-9(Epub8September2020.PMID:32901424;PMCID:PMC7996389).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Krieger N, Singh N, Waterman PD. Metrics for monitoring cancer inequities: residential segregation, the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), and breast cancer estrogen receptor status (USA, 1992–2012). Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27:1139–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0793-7. (Epub 2016 Aug 8 PMID: 27503397).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Loehrer MD, MPH.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markey, C., Bello, O., Hanley, M. et al. The Use of Area-Level Socioeconomic Indices in Evaluating Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 2620–2628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13099-x

Navigation