Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximum Value on Arterial Phase Computed Tomography Predicts Prognosis and Treatment Efficacy of Sunitinib for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the computed tomography maximum (CTmax) value on pretherapeutic arterial phase computed tomography (APCT) images to predict pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) recurrence and clarify its role in predicting the outcome of tumour therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 250 surgical patients and 24 nonsurgical patients with sunitinib-based treatment in our hospital from 2008 to 2019. CT images were assessed, the maximum value was defined as “CTmax,” and recurrence-free survival (RFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between a high-CTmax group and a low-CTmax group among patients who underwent surgical resection or nonsurgical, sunitinib-based treatment according to the CTmax cutoff value.

Results

In ROC curve analysis, a CTmax of 108 Hounsfield units, as the cutoff value, achieved an AUC of 0.796 in predicting recurrence. Compared with the low-CTmax group, the high-CTmax group had a longer RFS (p < 0.001). Low CTmax was identified as an independent factor for RFS (p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis; these results were confirmed using the internal validation set. The CTmax value was significantly correlated with the microvascular density (MVD) value (p < 0.001) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the high-CTmax group had a better PFS than the low-CTmax group among the sunitinib treatment group (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The tumour CTmax on APCT might be a potential and independent indicator for predicting recurrence in patients who have undergone surgical resection and assessing the efficacy of sunitinib for patients with advanced metastatic pNETs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bezzi C, Mapelli P, Presotto L, et al. Radiomics in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: methodological issues and clinical significance. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2021;48(12):4002–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Egal ESA, Jacenik D, Soares HP, et al. Translational challenges in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor immunotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1876(2):188640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferraro V, Tedeschi M, Laera L, et al. The role of laparoscopic surgery in localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021;22(4):27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mauriello C, Napolitano S, Gambardella C, et al. Conservative management and parenchyma-sparing resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: literature review. Int J Surg. 2015;21(Suppl 1):S10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hua J, Shi S, Xu J, et al. Expression patterns and prognostic value of DNA damage repair proteins in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann Surg. 2022;275(2):e443–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halfdanarson TR, Rubin J, Farnell MB, et al. Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: epidemiology and prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15(2):409–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Metz DC, Jensen RT. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1469–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mizumoto T, Toyama H, Terai S, et al. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by contrast enhancement characteristics. Pancreatology. 2017;17(6):956–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh S, Chan DL, Moody L, et al. Recurrence in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(4):583–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2016;30(1):179–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):152–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frost M, Lines KE, Thakker RV. Current and emerging therapies for PNETs in patients with or without MEN1. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(4):216–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaderli RM, Spanjol M, Kollár A, et al. Therapeutic options for neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):480–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cives M, Strosberg JR. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):471–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamarca A, Barriuso J, Kulke M, et al. Determination of an optimal response cut-off able to predict progression-free survival in patients with well-differentiated advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with sunitinib: an alternative to the current RECIST-defined response. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(2):181–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amoroso V, Fazio N, Mosca A, et al. When should everolimus be administered in the natural history of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1487–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma ZY, Gong YF, Zhuang HK, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(19):2305–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujimori N, Osoegawa T, Lee L, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(2):245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo CG, Ren S, Chen X, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: prediction of the tumor grade using magnetic resonance imaging findings and texture analysis with 3-T magnetic resonance. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:1933–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Worhunsky DJ, Krampitz GW, Poullos PD, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: hypoenhancement on arterial phase computed tomography predicts biological aggressiveness. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(4):304–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology. 2006;6(1–2):77–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis RB, Lattin GE Jr, Paal E. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: radiologic-clinicopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010;30(6):1445–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pavel M, Jann H, Prasad V, et al. NET blood transcript analysis defines the crossing of the clinical rubicon: when stable disease becomes progressive. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;104(2):170–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakano A, Hayano K, Tochigi T, et al. Prediction of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grades with fractal analysis of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadri D, Shahsavari F, Hezarkhani M, et al. Expression of CD34 and CD31 in central and peripheral giant cell granulomas. J Dent (Shiraz). 2019;20(1):10–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frilling A, Li J, Malamutmann E, et al. Treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours in relation to the extent of hepatic disease. Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):175–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yano M, Misra S, Carpenter DH, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: computed tomography enhancement, but not histological grade, correlates with tumor aggression. Pancreas. 2017;46(10):1366–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. VandenBussche CJ, Allison DB, Graham MK, et al. Alternative lengthening of telomeres and ATRX/DAXX loss can be reliably detected in FNAs of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(7):544–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singhi AD, Liu TC, Roncaioli JL, et al. Alternative lengthening of telomeres and loss of DAXX/ATRX expression predicts metastatic disease and poor survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(2):600–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marinoni I, Kurrer AS, Vassella E, et al. Loss of DAXX and ATRX are associated with chromosome instability and reduced survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(2):453-60.e455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim JY, Brosnan-Cashman JA, An S, et al. Alternative lengthening of telomeres in primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and poor survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(6):1598–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pea A, Yu J, Marchionni L, et al. Genetic analysis of small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors identifies subgroups with differing risks of liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2020;271(3):566–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vinik AI, Raymond E. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: approach to treatment with focus on sunitinib. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6(5):396–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20374), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (21JC1401500), the Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Education Committee (2019-01-07-00-07-E00057), the Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR1006A), the Xuhui District Artificial Intelligence Medical Hospital Cooperation Project (2021-011), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (20ZR1471100), and the National Science Foundation of China (No. 82141129, 82173281, 82173282, 82172577 and 82172948).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SRJ, XJY, and WT contributed to the conception of the study; ZY, XL, WHZ, HLG, YQ, and JC contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; HDC, ZL, YHH, XMC, YZ, and XWX performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; HDC helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Tang MD, PhD, Xianjun Yu MD, PhD, FACS or Shunrong Ji MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Li, Z., Hu, Y. et al. Maximum Value on Arterial Phase Computed Tomography Predicts Prognosis and Treatment Efficacy of Sunitinib for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 2988–2998 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12693-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12693-9

Navigation