Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Formal Lymphadenectomy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single Center Experience of 86 Consecutive Cases

  • Sarcoma
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lymph node metastases (LNMs) are rare in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and there is limited evidence to guide clinical management. We describe our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy in STS patients.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective review was performed for patients with STS treated with SLNB and/or lymphadenectomy from 1994 to 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics, multimodality treatment, regional/distant recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined.

Results

Eighty-six patients underwent SLNB (n = 34) and/or lymphadenectomy (n = 60) for STS. The most frequent histologic subtypes were epithelioid, clear cell, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Eight of 34 (23.5%) patients had a positive SLNB with 5-year OS of 71.4% compared with 71.9% for those with a negative SLNB. Eight of the 26 SLN-negative patients (30.8%) eventually developed nodal recurrence (n = 2) and/or (n = 6) distant metastasis with an estimated 5-year OS of 50%. Of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, estimated 5-year OS was 44.6% and median RFS was 12 months. Eight (13.3%) had distant disease at time of lymphadenectomy, 20 (33.3%) developed distant recurrence after lymphadenectomy, and 6 (10%) developed regional-only recurrence. Patients with regional-only recurrence after lymphadenectomy had an estimated 5-year OS of 66.7% compared with 29.1% for those who recurred distantly.

Conclusions

Patients with positive SLNB had similar survival to those with negative SLNB. Lymphadenectomy for isolated nodal disease is associated with poor RFS but reasonable 5-year OS when recurrence is regional-only. In STS, regional disease appears clinically distinct from distant metastatic disease and has better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keung EZ, Chiang YJ, Voss RK, et al. Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fong Y, Coit DG, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217(1):72–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199301000-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Refaie WB, Andtbacka RH, Ensor J, et al. Lymphadenectomy for isolated lymph node metastasis from extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer. 2008;112(8):1821–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daigeler A, Kuhnen C, Moritz R, et al. Lymph node metastases in soft tissue sarcomas: a single center analysis of 1,597 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(2):321–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0371-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skinner KA, Eilber FR. Soft tissue sarcoma nodal metastases: biologic significance and therapeutic considerations. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1996;5(1):121–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basile G, Mattei JC, Alshaygy I, et al. Curability of patients with lymph node metastases from extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2020;126(23):5098–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johannesmeyer D, Smith V, Cole DJ, Esnaola NF, Camp ER. The impact of lymph node disease in extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;206(3):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miccio JA, Jairam V, Gao S, et al. Predictors of lymph node involvement by soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremity: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Cureus. 2019;11(10):e6038. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Riad S, Griffin AM, Liberman B, et al. Lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:129–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000141660.05125.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Behranwala KA, A’Hern R, Omar AM, Thomas JM. Prognosis of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(7):714–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.04.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andreou D, Boldt H, Werner M, Hamann C, Pink D, Tunn PU. Sentinel node biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma subtypes with a high propensity for regional lymphatic spread—results of a large prospective trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(5):1400–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ecker BL, Peters MG, McMillan MT, et al. Implications of lymph node evaluation in the management of resectable soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(2):425–33. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5641-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Witt RG, Baldini EH, Raut CP. Screening populations at high risk for soft tissue sarcoma and surveillance following soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(5):882–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman KL, Kinnier CV, Farina DA, et al. Examination of national lymph node evaluation practices for adult extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(6):682–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sawamura C, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Okawa A. Lymphadenectomy and histologic subtype affect overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients with nodal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):926–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2568-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daigeler A, Kuhnen C, Moritz R, et al. Lymph node metastases in soft tissue sarcomas—a single center analysis of 1,597 patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2009;394(2):321–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright S, Armeson K, Hill EG, et al. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in select sarcoma patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2012;204(4):428–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):976–83. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.3.976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015 (discussion 398–401).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1307–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F. AJCC cancer staging manual. Berlin: Springer; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Billingsley KG, Burt ME, Jara E, et al. Pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of patterns of disease and postmetastasis survival. Ann Surg. 1999;229(5):602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Casson AG, Putnam JB, Natarajan G, et al. Five-year survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 1992;69(3):662–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher SB, Chiang Y-J, Feig BW, et al. Comparative performance of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems for soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(5):1126–32. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6378-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Weingrad D, Rosenberg S. Early lymphatic spread of osteogenic and soft-tissue sarcomas. Surgery. 1978;84(2):231–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mazeron JJ, Suit HD. Lymph nodes as sites of metastases from sarcomas of soft tissue. Cancer. 1987;60(8):1800–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Kelly Hunt: Armada Health—Medical Advisory Board, Research funding to my institution - Cairn Surgical, Eli Lilly & Co., Lumicell. Russell Witt: NIH T32 CA 009599.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Z. Keung MD, AM, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

There are no financial disclosures to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Witt, R.G., Cope, B., Erstad, D.J. et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Formal Lymphadenectomy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single Center Experience of 86 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 7092–7100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11803-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11803-x

Navigation