Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative Muscle-Adipose Index: A New Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies have shown that traditional nutrition indicators and body composition indicators are closely related to prognosis after radical gastric cancer (GC) surgery. However, the effect of the combined muscle and adipose composite on the prognosis of GC has not been reported.

Methods

The clinicopathological data of 514 patients with GC were retrospectively analyzed. The skeletal muscle adipose tissue were measured by preoperative CT images to obtain the muscle index and adipose index. X-tile software was used to determine the diagnostic threshold of muscle-adipose imbalance.

Results

The 5-year OS and RFS of the muscle-adipose imbalanced group were significantly worse than those of the balanced group. Multivariate analysis showed that muscle-adipose imbalance and the CONUT score were independent prognostic factors of OS and RFS (p < 0.05). The nuclear density curve showed that the recurrence risk of the muscle-adipose imbalanced group was higher than that of the balanced group, whereas the nuclear density curve of the CONUT score was confounded. Incorporating the muscle-adipose index into cTNM has the same prognostic performance as the pTNM staging system. Chemotherapy-benefit analysis showed that stage II/III patients in the muscle-adipose balanced group could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The preoperative muscle-adipose index discovered for the first time is a new independent prognostic factor that affects the prognosis with GC. In addition, the preoperative muscle-adipose index is better than traditional nutrition and body composition indicators in terms of the prognostic evaluation of GC patients and the predictive value of recurrence risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borre M, Dam GA, Knudsen AW, Grønbaek H. Nutritional status and nutritional risk in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):284–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1430848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, et al. Impact of malnutrition after gastrectomy for gastric cancer on long-term survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):974–83. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galizia G, Lieto E, Auricchio A, et al. Naples prognostic score, based on nutritional and inflammatory status, is an independent predictor of long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(12):1273–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuroda D, Sawayama H, Kurashige J, et al. Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Japanese Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2018;21(2):204–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0744-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paccagnella A, Morassutti I, Rosti G. Nutritional intervention for improving treatment tolerance in cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;23(4):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283479c66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakurai K, Ohira M, Tamura T, et al. Predictive potential of preoperative nutritional status in long-term outcome projections for patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):525–33. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4814-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao Y, Xu P, Kang H, et al. Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic biomarker for survival in digestive system carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2016;7(52):86573–83. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SH, Lee S, Song JH, et al. Prognostic significance of body mass index and prognostic nutritional index in stage II/III gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(4 Pt A):620–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuroda D, Sawayama H, Kurashige J, Iwatsuki M. Controlling Nutritional Status ( CONUT ) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Gastric Cancer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0744-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhuang C-L, Huang D-D, Pang W-Y, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: analysis from a large-scale cohort. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(13):e3164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng Z-F, Lu J, Zheng C-H, et al. A novel prognostic scoring system based on preoperative sarcopenia predicts the long-term outcome for patients after r0 resection for gastric cancer: experiences of a high-volume center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Voron T, Tselikas L, Pietrasz D, et al. Sarcopenia impacts on short- and long-term results of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1173–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malietzis G, Currie AC, Athanasiou T, et al. Influence of body composition profile on outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):572–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyamoto Y, Baba Y, Sakamoto Y, et al. Sarcopenia is a negative prognostic factor after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2663–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amini N, Spolverato G, Gupta R, et al. Impact total psoas volume on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a new tool to assess sarcopenia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(9):1593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan BHL, Birdsell LA, Martin L, Baracos VE, Fearon KCH. Sarcopenia in an overweight or obese patient is an adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(22):6973–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ting X, Lei L, Ying T, Yan C, Li L. Visceral and subcutaneous fat as new independent predictive factors of survival in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1893-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JH, Chin HM, Hwang SS, Jun KH. Impact of intra-abdominal fat on surgical outcome and overall survival of patients with gastric cancer. Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):346–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Agents A. Oncologist. Published online 2011:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0227

  21. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tegels JJW, van Vugt JLA, Reisinger KW, et al. Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer but not associated with worse outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(4):403–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma SWL, Zhou XCD, Li B, Zhen DH, Zhuang XSC. Impact of visceral fat on surgical complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0032-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Park HS, Kim HS, Beom SH, Rha SY. Marked loss of muscle, visceral fat, or subcutaneous fat after gastrectomy predicts poor survival in advanced gastric cancer: single-center study from the CLASSIC Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(11):3222–30. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6624-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harada K, Baba Y, Ishimoto T, Kosumi K. Low visceral fat content is associated with poor prognosis in a database of 507 upper gastrointestinal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3946–53. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4432-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guiu B, Petit JM, Bonnetain F, et al. Visceral fat area is an independent predictive biomarker of outcome after first-line bevacizumab- based treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Gut. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.188946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Balentine CJ, Enriquez J, Fisher W, Hodges S, Bansal V, Berger DH. Intra-abdominal fat predicts survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1297-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moon H, Ju Y, Jeong C, et al. Visceral obesity may affect oncologic outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):1918–22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9891-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S-L, Ma L-L, Chen X-Y, et al. Impact of visceral fat on surgical complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(3):436–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0032-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85(9):1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiang N, Deng J-Y, Ding X-W, et al. Prognostic nutritional index predicts postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(30):10537–44. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pecorelli N, Carrara G, de Cobelli F, et al. Effect of sarcopenia and visceral obesity on mortality and pancreatic fistula following pancreatic cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J-B, Xue Z, Lu J, et al. Effect of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms after radical gastrectomy: results from a large, two-institution series. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1002. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07506-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;272(2):342–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hacker UT, Hasenclever D, Linder N, et al. Prognostic role of body composition parameters in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients from the EXPAND trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, et al. Explaining the obesity paradox: the association between body composition and colorectal cancer survival ( C-SCANS Study ). Cancer Epidemiol Prevent Biomark. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schueneman AJ, Sugar EA, Uram J, et al. Low total lymphocyte count is associated with poor survival in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving a GM-CSF secreting pancreatic tumor vaccine. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(Suppl 3):S725–30. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3262-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Shimada H, Takiguchi N, Kainuma O, et al. High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(3):170–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0554-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang R, Li P, Wang T, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon 2 allele and low serum cholesterol as risk factors for gastric cancer in a Chinese Han population. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19930. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Suzuki Y, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, et al. Comparison of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan JCY, Chan DL, Diakos CI, et al. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a superior predictor of overall survival in comparison to established biomarkers of resectable colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):539–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lien Y-C, Hsieh C-C, Wu Y-C, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level is a prognostic indicator for adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2004;8(8):1041–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. de Ulíbarri Pérez JI, Fernández G, Rodríguez Salvanés F, Díaz López AM. Nutritional screening; control of clinical undernutrition with analytical parameters. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(4):797–811. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2014.29.4.7275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cengiz O, Kocer B, Sürmeli S, Santicky M-J, Soran A. Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma? Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2006;12(6):CR240–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dello SAWG, Lodewick TM, van Dam RM, et al. Sarcopenia negatively affects preoperative total functional liver volume in patients undergoing liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(3):165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ryo S, Kanda M, Ito S, et al. The controlling nutritional status score serves as a predictor of short- and long-term outcomes for patients with stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer: analysis of a multi-institutional data set. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(2):456–64. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07121-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mir O, Coriat R, Boudou-Rouquette P, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma pre-treated with sorafenib. Med Oncol. 2012;29(4):2793–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0208-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huillard O, Mir O, Peyromaure M, et al. Sarcopenia and body mass index predict sunitinib-induced early dose-limiting toxicities in renal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(5):1034–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chang-Ming Huang PhD or Chao-Hui Zheng MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

All of the authors declare that they have no potential commercial conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1382 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, J., Xue, Z., Xie, Jg. et al. Preoperative Muscle-Adipose Index: A New Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 4595–4607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11509-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11509-0

Navigation