Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgeon and Patient Reports of Fertility Preservation Referral and Uptake in a Prospective, Pan-Canadian Study of Young Women with Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prompt referral by their surgeon enables fertility preservation (FP) by young women with breast cancer (YWBC) without treatment delay. Following a FP knowledge intervention, we evaluated surgeon and patient reports of fertility discussion, FP referral offer and uptake, and FP choices and reasons for declining FP among patients enrolled in the Reducing Breast Cancer in Young Women, prospective pan-Canadian study.

Methods

Between September 2015 and December 2020, 1271 patients were enrolled at 31 sites. For each patient, surgeons were sent a questionnaire inquiring whether: (1) fertility discussion was initiated by the surgical team; (2) FP referral was offered; (3) referral was accepted; a reason was requested for any “no” response. Patients were surveyed about prediagnosis fertility plans and postdiagnosis oncofertility management.

Results

Surgeon questionnaires were completed for 1068 (84%) cases. Fertility was discussed with 828 (84%) and FP consultation offered to 461 (47%) of the 990 YWBC with invasive disease. Among the 906 responding YWBC, referral was offered to 220 (82%) of the 283 (33%) with invasive disease who stated that they had definitely/probably not completed childbearing prediagnosis. Of these, 133 (47%) underwent FP. The two most common reasons for not choosing FP were cost and unwillingness to delay treatment.

Conclusions

Although the rates of surgeon fertility discussion and FP referral was higher than most reports, likely due to our previous intervention, further improvement is desirable. FP should be offered to all YWBC at diagnosis, regardless of perceived childbearing intent. Cost remains an important barrier to FP uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenner DR, Weir HK, Demers AA, et al. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020. CMAJ. 2020;192(9):E199-205. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.191292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1710–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, et al. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):159–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stearns V, Schneider B, Henry NL, Hayes DF, Flockhart DA. Breast cancer treatment and ovarian failure: risk factors and emerging genetic determinants. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(11):886–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, et al. Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1151–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.8877.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Peate M, Meiser B, Hickey M, Friedlander M. The fertility-related concerns, needs and preferences of younger women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116(2):215–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0401-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4174–83. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.01.159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorman JR, Usita PM, Madlensky L, Pierce JP. Young breast cancer survivors: their perspectives on treatment decisions and fertility concerns. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181e4528d.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson C, Wilson R, Sherman R, Firth R, Charlton M. 2013–2017: CANCER IN NORTH AMERICA volume four: combined cancer incidence for the United States, Canada and North America. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; 2020.

  11. Lambertini M, Kroman N, Ameye L, et al. Long-term safety of pregnancy following breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(4):426–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah NM, Scott DM, Kandagatla P, et al. Young women with breast cancer: fertility preservation options and management of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1214–24. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07156-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Hondt C, Vanhoeij M, Van Moer E, et al. Fertility preservation does not delay the initiation of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;184(2):433–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05858-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Letourneau JM, Wald K, Sinha N, et al. Fertility preservation before breast cancer treatment appears unlikely to affect disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 43 months after fertility-preservation consultation. Cancer. 2020;126(3):487–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Eloranta S, Krawiec K, Lissmats A, Bergh J, Liljegren A. Safety of fertility preservation in breast cancer patients in a register-based matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(3):761–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4555-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Warner E, Glass K, Foong S, Sandwith E. Update on fertility preservation for younger women with breast cancer. Cmaj. 2020;192(35):E1003–9. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2917–31. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glass KB. A survey of fertility preservation practices by Canadian oncologists for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCray DK, Simpson AB, Flyckt R, et al. Fertility in women of reproductive age after breast cancer treatment: practice patterns and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3175–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2500–10. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Quan ML, Olivotto IA, Baxter NN, et al. A pan-Canadian prospective study of young women with breast cancer: the rationale and protocol design for the ruby study. Curr Oncol. 2020;27(5):e516–23. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Warner E, Yee S, Seminsky M, et al. Effect of a knowledge-translation intervention on breast surgeons’ oncofertility attitudes and practices. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(5):1645–52. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07972-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Warner E, Yee S, Kennedy E, et al. Oncofertility knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Canadian breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(12):3850–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5423-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorman JR, Su HI, Pierce JP, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL. A multidimensional scale to measure the reproductive concerns of young adult female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(2):218–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0333-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorman JR, Pan-Weisz TM, Drizin JH, Su HI, Malcarne VL. Revisiting the reproductive concerns after cancer (RCAC) scale. Psychooncology. 2019;28(7):1544–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Partridge AH, Ruddy KJ, Barry WT, et al. A randomized study to improve care for young women with breast cancer at community and academic medical oncology practices in the United States: the Young and Strong study. Cancer. 2019;125(11):1799–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson K, Dyson G, Holland L, Joubert L. An exploratory study of oncology specialists’ understanding of the preferences of young people living with cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 2013;52(2–3):166–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2012.737898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (#OBW139590). The authors thank all participating surgeons and women for without their collaboration, this manuscript would not be possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Warner MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carmona, C.A., Yee, S., Seminsky, M. et al. Surgeon and Patient Reports of Fertility Preservation Referral and Uptake in a Prospective, Pan-Canadian Study of Young Women with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 3022–3033 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11254-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11254-w

Navigation