Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing Recurrent Pseudomyxoma Peritonei in 430 Patients After Complete Cytoreduction and HIPEC: A Dilemma for Patients and Surgeons

  • Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Epithelial appendiceal neoplasms are uncommon peritoneal malignancies causing a spectrum of disease including pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). The optimal management is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite complete CRS (CCRS), recurrence develops in almost 45% of patients. No consensus exists for the optimal treatment of recurrent disease, with treatment strategies including repeat CRS, watch-and-wait, and palliative chemotherapy. This report aims to describe evolving management strategies for a large cohort with recurrence after CCRS.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed a prospective database of patients with recurrence after CCRS for appendiceal neoplasms from 1994 to 2017 who had long-term follow-up evaluation with tumor markers and computed tomography (CT).

Results

Overall, 430 (37.6%) of 1145 PMP patients experienced recurrence at a median of 19 months. Of these 430 patients 145 (33.7%) underwent repeat CRS, 119 (27.7%) had a watch-and-wait approach, and 119 (27.7%) had palliative chemotherapy. The patients with recurrence had a median overall survival (OS) of 39 months, a 3-year survival of 74.6%, a 5-year survival of 57.4%, and a 10-year survival of 36.5%. In the multivariate analysis, the patients who had recurrence within 1 year after primary CRS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.55), symptoms at recurrence (HR, 3.08), a high grade of disease or adenocarcinoma pathology (HR, 2.94), signet ring cells (HR, 1.91), extraperitoneal metastatic disease (HR, 1.71), or male gender (HR, 1.61) had worse OS. The OS was longer for the patients who had repeat CRS (HR, 0.41). The patients who underwent repeat CCRS had a 3-year OS of 87.5%, a 5-year OS of 78.1%, and a 10-year OS of 67.9%.

Conclusions

Dilemmas persist around the optimal management of patients with recurrence after CRS and HIPEC for appendiceal tumors. Selected patients benefit from repeat CRS, particularly those with favorable tumor biology and focal disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patrick-Brown T, Carr NJ, Swanson DM, et al. Estimating the prevalence of pseudomyxoma peritonei in Europe using a novel statistical method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;28:252–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharif US, Chandrakumaran K, Dayal S, et al. Mode of presentation in 1070 patients with perforated epithelial appendiceal tumors, predominantly with pseudomyxoma peritonei. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:1257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugarbaker PH. Management of peritoneal surface malignancy using intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery. A manual for physicians and nurses. Michigan: Luddan Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ansari N, Chandrakumaran K, Dayal S, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 1000 patients with perforated appendiceal epithelial tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1035–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chua TC, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, et al. Early- and long-term outcome data of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin treated by a strategy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2449–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smeenk RM, Verwaal VJ, Antonini N, et al. Survival analysis of pseudomyxoma peritonei patients treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lord AC, Shihab O, Chandrakumaran K, et al. Recurrence and outcome after complete tumour removal and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 512 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from perforated appendiceal mucinous tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:396–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyang LS, Alzahrani NA, Alshahrani MS, et al. Early recurrence in peritoneal metastasis of appendiceal neoplasm: Survival and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:2392–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mercier F, Dagbert F, Pocard M, et al. Recurrence of pseudomyxoma peritonei after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open. 2019;3:195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, et al. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) modified Delphi process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Govaerts K, Chandrakumaran K, Carr NJ, et al. Single centre guidelines for radiological follow-up based on 775 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy S, Cecil T, Allan P, et al. Extending the indications of intestinal transplantation: modified multivisceral transplantation for end-stage pseudomyxoma peritoneii. Transplantation. 2017;101:S89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sardi A, Jimenez WA, Nieroda C, et al. Repeated cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal cancer: analysis of survival outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:1207–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan GHC, Chia CS, Tan SH, et al. Early recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:989–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chua TC, Liauw W, Morris DL. Early recurrence of pseudomyxoma peritonei following treatment failure of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is indicative of a poor survival outcome. Int J Colorect Dis. 2012;27:381–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan TD, Bijelic L, Sugarbaker PH. Critical analysis of treatment failure after complete cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karpes JB, Lansom JD, Alshahrani M, et al. Repeat cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. BJS Open. 2020;4:478–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Esquivel J, Sugarbaker PH. Second-look surgery in patients with peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal malignancy: analysis of prognostic factors in 98 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:198–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kitai T, Yamanaka K. Repeat cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kusamura S, Barretta F, Yonemura Y, et al. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pseudomyxoma peritonei after cytoreductive surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:e206363. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro JF, Chase JL, Wolff RA, et al. Modern systemic chemotherapy in surgically unresectable neoplasms of appendiceal origin: a single-institution experience. Cancer. 2010;116:316–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eng C, Udell Blackham A, Overman MJ, et al. Systemic chemotherapy in the setting of unresectable appendiceal epithelial neoplasms (AEN). J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pietrantonio F, Maggi C, Fanetti G, et al. FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or relapsed peritoneal pseudomyxoma. Oncologist. 2014;19:845–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choe JH, Overman MJ, Fournier KF, et al. Improved survival with anti-VEGF therapy in the treatment of unresectable appendiceal epithelial neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2578–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: NA, JG, BM; Acquisition of data: NA, DK, SS, WB; Analysis and interpretation of data: NA, BM, TC, FM, SD, AT; Drafting of article: NA, DK, SS, WB, BM; Critical revision of article: NA, JG, BM, TC, FM, SD, AT

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan John Moran MB, BCh, FRCSI, M.Ch, Doc Med.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Final approval has been given by all authors for the manuscript to be published in the current format.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, N., Kostadinov, D., Sakata, S. et al. Managing Recurrent Pseudomyxoma Peritonei in 430 Patients After Complete Cytoreduction and HIPEC: A Dilemma for Patients and Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 7809–7820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10093-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10093-z

Navigation