Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal Timing of Initiating Dynamic Risk Stratification During the Early Postoperative Period in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma After Thyroidectomy and Radioactive Iodine Remnant Ablation

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the optimal timing to initiate assessment of the response to initial therapy during the early postoperative period in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) using dynamic risk stratification (DRS).

Methods

This historical cohort study included 510 patients with DTC who underwent a total thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation. DRS for these patients was categorized into subgroups according to the time into the follow-up period at which the response to initial therapy was assessed. The ability of each DRS subgroup to predict the long-term structural recurrence of cancer was compared using the proportion of variance explained (PVE) from logistic regression models.

Results

The median follow-up period was 108 months. Structural recurrence occurred in 7.6% of patients (n = 39/510). The PVE for long-term structural recurrence was higher among DRS subgroups (28.8–34.19%) compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis staging system (both the 7th and 8th editions; 4.01% and 6.13%, respectively) and the American Thyroid Association initial risk estimate (4.59%). Among the DRS subgroups, DRS assessed between 2 and 3 years after the initial surgery was associated with the highest PVE (34.19%).

Conclusions

The first assessment of DRS optimally predicts long-term structural recurrence in patients with DTC who underwent a total thyroidectomy and subsequent RAI remnant ablation at that 2- to 3-year postoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krajewska J, Chmielik E, Jarząb B. Dynamic risk stratification in the follow-up of thyroid cancer: what is still to be discovered in 2017? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24(11):R387-r402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuttle RM, Alzahrani AS. Risk stratification in differentiated thyroid cancer: from detection to final follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(9):4087–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Momesso DP, Tuttle RM. Update on differentiated thyroid cancer staging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2014;43(2):401–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Momesso DP, Vaisman F, Yang SP, et al. Dynamic risk stratification in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated without radioactive iodine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(7):2692–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tarasova VD, Tuttle RM. A risk-adapted approach to follow-up in differentiated thyroid cancer. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2016;7(1):e0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuttle RM, Tala H, Shah J, et al. Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system. Thyroid. 2010;20(12):1341–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Castagna MG, Maino F, Cipri C, et al. Delayed risk stratification, to include the response to initial treatment (surgery and radioiodine ablation), has better outcome predictivity in differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(3):441–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park S, Kim WG, Song E, et al. Dynamic risk stratification for predicting recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated without radioactive iodine remnant ablation therapy. Thyroid. 2017;27(4):524–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cady B, Rossi R. An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 1988;104(6):947–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Goellner JR, et al. Predicting outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma: development of a reliable prognostic scoring system in a cohort of 1779 patients surgically treated at one institution during 1940 through 1989. Surgery. 1993;114(6):1050–7 (discussion 7-8).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hay ID, Grant CS, Taylor WF, et al. Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system. Surgery. 1987;102(6):1088–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerch H, Schober O, Kuwert T, et al. Survival of differentiated thyroid carcinoma studied in 500 patients. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(5):2067–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 1994;97(5):418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noguchi S, Murakami N, Kawamoto H. Classification of papillary cancer of the thyroid based on prognosis. World J Surg. 1994;18(4):552–7 (discussion 8).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaha AR, Loree TR, Shah JP. Intermediate-risk group for differentiated carcinoma of thyroid. Surgery. 1994;116(6):1036–40 (discussion 40-1).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherman SI, Brierley JD, Sperling M, et al. Prospective multicenter study of thyroiscarcinoma treatment: initial analysis of staging and outcome. National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study Registry Group. Cancer. 1998;83(5):1012–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Dralle H, et al. European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(6):787–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitoia F, Ward L, Wohllk N, et al. Recommendations of the Latin American Thyroid Society on diagnosis and management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53(7):884–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Ho Yoon MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jae Hyun Park, Gil Seong Moon, Kyung Tae Nam, and Jong Ho Yoon declare that no competing financial interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.H., Moon, G.S., Nam, K.T. et al. Optimal Timing of Initiating Dynamic Risk Stratification During the Early Postoperative Period in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma After Thyroidectomy and Radioactive Iodine Remnant Ablation. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 6580–6589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09721-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09721-5

Navigation