Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Truncal and Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis from the National Cancer Database

  • Sarcoma
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the association between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and overall survival (OS) in truncal/extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients, ages 18–85 years, who underwent resection of primary, truncal/extremity STS between 2010 and 2012, and had LVI data. The primary endpoint was OS.

Results

Among 6169 patients identified, the most common histology groups were (1) liposarcoma (LPS, 24%), (2) undifferentiated pleiomorphic sarcoma (UPS, 19%), and (3) leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 15%); 449 patients (7%) were LVI-positive. There were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between the LVI groups. Compared with LVI-negative patients, LVI-positive patients were more likely to have larger (> 5 cm: 80% vs. 66%), deep (80% vs. 68%), and high-grade tumors (82% vs. 57%). They were also more likely to have positive margins (27% vs. 17%), nodal (16% vs. 2%) and metastatic disease (21% vs. 4%), and receive chemotherapy (37% vs. 18%; all p < 0.001). LVI was associated with worse median OS (39 months vs. MNR; p < 0.001), which persisted on stratum-specific analyses for all tumor grades, size categories, and stages I–III, but not stage IV. On multivariable Cox regression, LVI was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–2.44), while accounting for other significant prognostic factors. Among non-metastatic, curative-intent resections (n = 5696), LVI was still associated with worse OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.28–2.49).

Conclusions

LVI appears to be an important adverse pathologic factor in truncal and extremity STS. Even when taking into account other established prognostic factors, LVI was predictive of worse OS. Knowledge of LVI status may help to better risk-stratify patients and guide management strategies, and should be considered in future prognostic classification schemes and nomograms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Le Deley MC, Paulussen M, Lewis I, et al. Cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in consolidation treatment of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma: results of the randomized noninferiority Euro-EWING99-R1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(23):2440–2448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW, et al. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer. 2005;103(2):402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carneiro A, Bendahl PO, Engellau J, et al. A prognostic model for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall based on size, vascular invasion, necrosis, and growth pattern. Cancer. 2011;117(6):1279–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gustafson P, Akerman M, Alvegard TA, et al. Prognostic information in soft tissue sarcoma using tumour size, vascular invasion and microscopic tumour necrosis-the SIN-system. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(11):1568–1576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ethun CG, Postlewait LM, Le N, et al. Association of optimal time interval to re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer with overall survival: a multi-institution analysis from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher SB, Patel SH, Kooby DA, et al. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(8):514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel SH, Kooby DA, Staley CA, 3rd, Sarmiento JM, Maithel SK. The prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in cholangiocarcinoma above the cystic duct: a new selection criterion for adjuvant therapy? HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(9):605–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poorman CE, Ethun CG, Postlewait LM, et al. A novel T-stage classification system for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal from the US adrenocortical carcinoma study group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(2):520–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin LX, Moses LE, Squires MH 3rd, et al. Factors associated with recurrence and survival in lymph node-negative gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-institution study of the US gastric cancer collaborative. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):999–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, et al. Proposal for a risk-based categorization of uterine carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3676–3684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, et al. Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soft Tissue Sarcoma. In: Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.

  14. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F (eds). World health organization classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roma AA, Barbuto DA, Samimi SA, et al. Vascular invasion in uterine sarcomas and its significance. A multi-institutional study. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(11):1712–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustafson P. Soft-tissue sarcoma—epidemiology and prognosis in 508 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van den Eynden GG, Van der Auwera I, Van Laere SJ, et al. Distinguishing blood and lymph vessel invasion in breast cancer: a prospective immunohistochemical study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(11):1643–1649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Center (NIH/NCI) under award number P30CA138292. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The data used in the study are derived from a de-identified NCDB file. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology used, or the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Cardona MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ethun, C.G., Lopez-Aguiar, A.G., Switchenko, J.M. et al. The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Truncal and Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 4723–4729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07805-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07805-x

Navigation