Skip to main content
Log in

Both Ultrasound Features and Nuclear Atypia are Associated with Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal management of thyroid nodules that undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with findings of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is unclear. Categorizing nodules by AUS subtype and ultrasound characteristics may improve risk stratification. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between AUS subtype and ultrasound features on risk of malignancy (ROM).

Methods

We performed a review of all patients with a thyroid nodule who underwent an FNA at our institution between January 2010 and November 2015. Patients with AUS were divided into groups with (1) nuclear atypia, (2) architectural atypia, or (3) Hurthle cell atypia. Their ultrasound features were assessed using the American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid nodule sonographic patterns. We conducted a univariate and multivariable analysis to determine the association between AUS subtype and other variables of interest with ROM.

Results

Of the 3428 thyroid nodules that underwent FNA, 237 (6.9%) had AUS. Of the 97 surgically resected nodules, 67 (69%) were benign and 30 (31%) were malignant. On univariate analysis nuclear atypia (p < 0.01) was associated with a thyroid malignancy. On multivariable analysis, both ATA high-risk ultrasound features (p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 3.68) and nuclear atypia (p < 0.01, OR 11.8) were independently associated with a final diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.

Conclusions

Nuclear atypia and ATA high-risk ultrasound features are useful in identifying patients with AUS that are at a higher risk of thyroid malignancy. Surgeons should take these factors into consideration when evaluating patients with AUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(3):226–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kholová I, Ludvíková M. Thyroid atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: an indispensable Bethesda 2010 diagnostic category or waste garbage? Acta Cytol. 2014;58(4):319–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Thyroid Carcinoma (Version 2.2017) https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/thyroid_blocks.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.

  6. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27(11):1341–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SJ, Roh J, Baek JH, et al. Risk of malignancy according to sub-classification of the atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Cytopathology. 2017;28(1):65–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olson MT, Clark DP, Erozan YS, et al. Spectrum of risk of malignancy in subcategories of “atypia of undetermined significance.” Acta Cytol. 2011;55:518–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao LY, Wang Y, Jiang YX, et al. Ultrasound is helpful to differentiate Bethesda class III thyroid nodules: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JH, Han K, Kim EK, et al. Risk stratification of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) cytology using ultrasonography patterns defined by the 2015 ATA Guidelines. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017;126(9):625–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DW, Lee EJ, Jung SJ, et al. Role of sonographic diagnosis in managing Bethesda class III nodules. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(11):2136–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Onder S, Firat P, Ates D, et al. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: an institutional experience of the outcome of indeterminate categories. Cytopathology. 2014;25(3):177–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renshaw AA. Should “atypical follicular cells” in thyroid fine needle aspirates be subclassified? Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2010;118:186–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Laan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF, et al. Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations: with atypia of undetermined significance. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:572–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu HH, Inman A, Cramer HM, et al. Subclassification of “atypia of undetermined significance” in thyroid fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23052. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horne MJ, Chhieng DC, Theoharis C, et al. Thyroid follicular lesion of undetermined significance: evaluation of the risk of malignancy using the two-tier sub-classification. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:410–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho AS, Sarti EE, Jain KS, et al. Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS). Thyroid. 2014;24(5):832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Laan PA, Marqusee E and Krane JF. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: Should repeated FNA be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:770–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, et al. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda system III cytology: can ultrasonography guide the next step? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(9):3083–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong SH, Hong HS, Lee EH, et al Outcome of thyroid nodules characterized as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance and correlation with ultrasound features and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(6):W854–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosario PW. Thyroid nodules with atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (Bethesda Category III): importance of ultrasonography and cytological subcategory. Thyroid. 2014;24(7):1115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo WS, Choi HS, Cho SW, et al. The role of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules with atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;80(5):735–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim DS, Kim JH, Na DG, et al. Sonographic features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas in comparison with conventional papillary thyroid carcinomas. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(12):1685–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee S, Shin JH, Oh YL, et al. Subcategorization of Bethesda System Category III by ultrasonography. Thyroid. 2016;26(6):836–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park CS, Kim SH, Jung SL, et al. Observer variability in the sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38(6):287–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dincer N, Balci S, Yazgan A et al. Follow-up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology. 2013;24(6):385–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gan TR, Nga ME, Lum JH, et al. Thyroid cytology-nuclear versus architectural atypia within the “Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance” Bethesda category have significantly different rates of malignancy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(4):245–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikiforov, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. A paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0386. Published online April 14, 2016. Corrected on May 12, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mathur A, Najafian A, Schneider EB, et al. Malignancy risk and reproducibility associated with atypia of undetermined significance on thyroid cytology. Surgery. 2014;156(6):1471–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr. Alison Semrad and Dr. Kent Ishihara for their help reviewing and providing critical feedback on this manuscript. We would also like to thank Dr. Sandra Taylor for statistical assistance.

Funding

Department funds were used for incidental expenses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Campbell MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eisa, N., Khan, A., Akhter, M. et al. Both Ultrasound Features and Nuclear Atypia are Associated with Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 3913–3918 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6826-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6826-6

Keywords

Navigation