Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peritoneal Lavage CEA mRNA Levels Predict Conversion Gastrectomy Outcomes after Induction Chemotherapy with Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The outcome of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis remains poor. We treated these patients with intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus oral S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil), followed by gastrectomy in responders. We evaluated the clinical significance of peritoneal lavage carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) messenger RNA (mRNA) levels as a biomarker for indication of conversion gastrectomy.

Methods

The peritoneal lavage of 68 patients who received the above regimen as induction chemotherapy was repeatedly collected via intraperitoneal access ports. Gastrectomy was considered when improvement of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by a second laparoscopic examination with negative peritoneal cytology. CEA and porphobilinogen deaminase mRNAs were chronologically quantified using the transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction method. The CEA mRNA index (CmRI) was calculated as CEA mRNA/porphobilinogen deaminase mRNA × 10,000.

Results

Thirty-nine patients underwent gastrectomy and 29 patients did not (median survival time, 27.8 vs. 10.7 months, respectively; P < 0.001). In gastrectomy-positive patients, the outcome largely differed according to CmRI values immediately prior to surgery. Patients with a preoperative CmRI value <100 (n = 20) were associated with a significantly longer survival than those with a preoperative CmRI value >100 (n = 19) (41.8 vs. 20.1 months, respectively; P < 0.001). A preoperative CmRI value <100 was confirmed as an independent predictor of survival for gastrectomy-positive patients in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The CmRI reflects the response of peritoneal metastases to induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy. It may be a useful biomarker for indicating gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamao T, Shimada Y, Shirao K, et al. Phase II study of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy against peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer with malignant ascites: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, JCOG 9603 Trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imazawa M, Kojima T, Boku N, et al. Efficacy of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MTX/5FU) in improving oral intake in patients with advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal dissemination. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh SY, Kwon HC, Lee S, et al. A Phase II study of oxaliplatin with low-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX-4) for gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:930–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitayama J, Ishigami H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Salvage gastrectomy after intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel (PTX) administration with oral S-1 for peritoneal dissemination of advanced gastric cancer with malignant ascites. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:539–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamaguchi H, Kitayama J, Ishigami H, et al. Breakthrough therapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer: intraperitoneal chemotherapy with taxanes. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7:285–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishigami H, Kitayama J, Kaisaki S, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:67–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fushida S, Kinoshita J, Kaji M, et al. Phase I/II study of intraperitoneal docetaxel plus S-1 for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:1265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K, et al. Intraperitoneal docetaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:38–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi H, Kitayama J, Ishigami H, Emoto S, Yamashita H, Watanabe T. A phase 2 trial of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for treatment of gastric cancer with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis. Cancer. 2013;119:3354–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishigami H, Kitayama J, Otani K, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2009;76:311–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishigami H, Yamaguchi H, Yamashita H, Asakage M, Kitayama J. Surgery after intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology findings. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:128–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishii T, Fujiwara Y, Ohnaka S, et al. Rapid genetic diagnosis with the transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction system for cancer micrometastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murono K, Kazama S, Yamaguchi H, et al. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage by the transcription-reverse transcription concerted method indicates poor prognosis in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Surgery. 2015;157:322–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated cancer cells in the greater omentum of gastric carcinoma patients with real-time RT-PCR: a comparison with peritoneal lavage cytology. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:69–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang JY, Lin SR, Lu CY, et al. Gastric cancer cell detection in peritoneal lavage: RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen transcripts versus the combined cytology with peritoneal carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Cancer Lett. 2005;223:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujiwara Y, Doki Y, Taniguchi H, et al. Genetic detection of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of the patient with gastric cancer: present status and future perspectives. Gastric Cancer. 2007;10:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamashita H, Yamaguchi H, Kaisaki S, Kitayama J. Clinical significance of CA125 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:154–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takata A, Kurokawa Y, Fujiwara Y, et al. Prognostic value of CEA and CK20 mRNA in the peritoneal lavage fluid of patients undergoing curative surgery for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38:1107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Zhang D, Zhang H, Miao Z, Tang Y, Sun G, Dai D. Prediction of peritoneal recurrence by the mRNA level of CEA and MMP-7 in peritoneal lavage of gastric cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3463–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horikawa M, Iinuma H, Inoue T, Ogawa E, Fukushima R. Clinical significance of intraperitoneal CD44 mRNA levels of magnetically separated CD45-negative EpCAM-positive cells for peritoneal recurrence and prognosis in stage II and III gastric cancer patients. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:1413–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okada K, Fujiwara Y, Nakamura Y, et al. Oncofetal protein, IMP-3, a potential marker for prediction of postoperative peritoneal dissemination in gastric adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:780–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hironori Yamaguchi MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding

This research was partially funded by a Grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and a KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K10086) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 6079 kb)

Alterations in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) messenger RNA (mRNA) index values during induction chemotherapy in conversion gastrectomy patients with a preoperative CEA mRNA index value of (a) <100 (n = 20) or (b) >100 (n = 19). The x-axis represents the number of days since commencing induction chemotherapy. c Alterations in CEA mRNA index values during first-line chemotherapy up until the point of switching to second-line treatment in patients who did not undergo conversion gastrectomy (n = 29)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, H., Satoh, Y., Ishigami, H. et al. Peritoneal Lavage CEA mRNA Levels Predict Conversion Gastrectomy Outcomes after Induction Chemotherapy with Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3345–3352 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5997-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5997-x

Keywords

Navigation