Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Model to Predict Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Competing Risk Analysis

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the cumulative incidence of cause-specific death and other causes of death for patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). The secondary aim was to model the probability of cause-specific death and build a competing risk nomogram to predict cause-specific mortality for this disease.

Methods

Data were extracted from the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 dataset. The study cohort included patients with a diagnosis of primary head and neck ACC during the period 2004–2013. We calculated the cumulative incidence function (CIF) for cause-specific death and other causes of death, and constructed the Fine and Gray’s proportional subdistribution hazard model, as well as a competing-risk nomogram based on Fine and Gray’s model, to predict the probability of cause-specific death for patients with head and neck ACC.

Results

After data selection, 1435 cases were included for analysis. Five-year cumulative incidence of cause-specific death was 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.1–19.8%) and cumulative incidence of other causes of death was 5.8% (95% CI 4.4–7.4%). Predictors of cause-specific death for head and neck ACC included age, tumor size, advanced T stage, positive lymph node, distant metastasis, and surgery. The nomogram was well-calibrated, and had good discriminative ability.

Conclusion

The large sample allowed us to construct a reliable predictive model for rare malignancy. The model performance was good, with a concordance index of 0.79, and the nomogram can provide useful individualized predictive information for patients with head and neck ACC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green RW, Megwalu UC. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the external ear: a population based study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2016;37(4):346–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2015 Sub (1973-2013 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2014 Counties. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission.

  3. Gondivkar SM, Gadbail AR, Chole R, Parikh RV. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: a rare clinical entity and literature review. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(4):231–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhayani MK, Yener M, El-Naggar A, et al. Prognosis and risk factors for early-stage adenoid cystic carcinoma of the major salivary glands. Cancer. 2012;118(11):2872–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellington CL, Goodman M, Kono SA, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: Incidence and survival trends based on 1973-2007 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Cancer. 2012;118(18):4444–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozdemir C, Karacetin D, Tuna S, Karadeniz A. Treatment and clinicopathologic predictors for adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. J BUON. 2011;16(1):123–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li N, Xu L, Zhao H, El-Naggar AK, Sturgis EM. A comparison of the demographics, clinical features, and survival of patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of major and minor salivary glands versus less common sites within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Cancer. 2012;118(16):3945–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubal PM, Unsal AA, Chung SY, et al. Population-based trends in outcomes in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oral cavity. Am J Otolaryngol. 2016;37(5):398–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16:1141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of competing risks in survival analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JC, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrell F. Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer, Berlin 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrell FE Jr. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. R package version 4.3-1. 2015. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms.

  14. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016. https://www.R-project.org/.

  15. Gray B. cmprsk: Subdistribution Analysis of Competing Risks. R package version 2.2-7. 2014. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cmprsk.

  16. Mogensen UB, Ishwaran H, Gerds TA. Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. J Stat Softw. 2012;50(11):1–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko JJ, Siever JE, Hao D, Simpson R, Lau HY. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck: clinical predictors of outcome from a Canadian centre. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(1):26–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lloyd S, Yu JB, Wilson LD, Decker RH. Determinants and patterns of survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck, including an analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34(1):76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang L, Shen W, Sakamoto N. Population-based study evaluating and predicting the probability of death resulting from thyroid cancer and other causes among patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(4):468–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L. Cancer-specific mortality and competing mortality in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a competing risk analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(1):264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L. Melanoma-specific mortality and competing mortality in patients with non-metastatic malignant melanoma: a population-based analysis. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kattan MW, Heller G, Brennan MF. A competing-risks nomogram for sarcoma-specific death following local recurrence. Stat Med. 2003;22(22):3515–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kutikov A, Egleston BL, Wong YN, Uzzo RG. Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(26):4300–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanrahan EO, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Giordano SH, et al. Overall survival and cause-specific mortality of patients with stage T1a,bN0M0 breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(31):4952––60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L. Prognostic models to predict overall and cause-specific survival for patients with middle ear cancer: a population-based analysis. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the NCI for open access to their SEER database. The opinions or views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the opinions or recommendations of the NCI.

Disclosure

Weidong Shen, Naoko Sakamoto, and Limin Yang have no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding

No Grant funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin Yang MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, W., Sakamoto, N. & Yang, L. Model to Predict Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Competing Risk Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 2129–2136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5861-z

Keywords

Navigation