Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sentinel-Lymph-Node-Based Management or Routine Axillary Clearance? Five-Year Outcomes of the RACS Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Axillary Clearance (SNAC) 1 Trial: Assessment and Incidence of True Lymphedema

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether the benefits of sentinel-node-based management (SNBM) over routine axillary clearance (RAC) persisted to 5 years.

Methods

A total of 1088 women with breast cancer less than 3 cm in diameter and clinically negative axillary nodes were randomized to SNBM with axillary clearance if the sentinel node was positive or RAC preceded by sentinel-node biopsy. The outcomes were: (1) objectively measured change in the volume of the operated and contralateral nonoperated arms; (2) the proportion with an increase in arm volume <15%; and (3) subjectively assessed arm morbidity for the domains swelling, symptoms, dysfunction, and disability. Assessments were performed at 1 and 6 months after surgery and then annually.

Results

Limb volume increased progressively in the operated and nonoperated arms for 2 years and persisted unchanged to year 5, accompanied by weight gain. Correction by change in the nonoperated arm showed a mean volume increase of 70 mL in the RAC group and 26 mL in the SNBM group (P < 0.001) at 5 years. Only 28 patients (3.3%) had a corrected increase >15% from baseline (RAC 5.0% vs. SNBM 1.7%). Significant predictors were surgery type (RAC vs. SNBM), obesity, diabetes, palpable tumor, and weight gain exceeding 10% of baseline value.

Conclusions

Subjective assessments revealed persisting patient concerns about swelling and symptoms but not overall disability at 5 years. Subjective scores were only moderately correlated with volume increase. SNAC1 has demonstrated that objective morbidity and subjective morbidity persist for 5 years after surgery and that SNBM significantly lowers the risk of both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gill PG, Wetzig N, Gebski V, et al, and the SNAC Trial Group. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? One-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): a randomized controlled surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:266–75.

  2. Elmadahm AA, Gill PG, Bochner M, Gebski V, Zannino D, Wetzig N, Campbell I, Stockler M, Ung O, Simes J, Uren R.. Identification of the Sentinel Lymph Node in the SNAC-1 Trial. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(1–2):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tewari N, Gill P G, Bochner M, Kollias J. Comparison of volume displacement versus circumferential upper limb measurements for lymphoedema: implications for the SNAC trial. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:889–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith MJ, Gill PG, Wetzig N, et al. Comparing patients’ and clinicians’ assessment of outcomes in a randomised trial of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer (the RACS SNAC trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;117:99–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wetzig N, Gill PG, Zanno D, Stockler MR, Gebski V, Ung O, Campbell I, Simes J. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? Three-year outcomes of the RACS sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC) 1 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;16:266–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mansel RE, Fallowfield LJ, Kissin M. Randomised multicentre trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(9):599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Leitch AM, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(4):491–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hack TF, Kwan WB, Thomas-MacLean JL, Towers A, Miedema B, Tilley A, et al. Predictors of arm morbidity following breast cancer surgery. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19(11):1205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson VS, Pearson ML, Ganz PA, Adams J, Kahn KL. Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(2):96–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ashikaga T, Krag DN, Land SR, Julian TB, Anderson SJ, Brown AM, et al. Morbidity results from the NSABP B-32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissection versus axillary dissection. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(2):111–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Coen JJ, Taghian AG, Kachnic LA, Coen JJ, Assaad SI. Risk of lymphoedema after regional nodal irradiation with breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(5):1209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dayes IS, Levine MN, Julian JA, Pritchard KI, D’Souza DP, Kligman L, et al. Lymphoedema in women with breast cancer: characteristics of patients screened for a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(2):337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT. Prevalence of lymphoedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: patient perceptions and precautionary behaviours. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(32):5220–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kissin M, Querci-Della-Rovere G, Easton D, Westbury G. Risk of lymphoedema following the treatment for breast cancer. BJS. 1986;73:580–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Larson D, Weinstein M, Goldburg L, Silver B, Recht A, Cady Y. Oedema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage 1-2 carcinoma of the breast treated primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986:12;1575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liljegren G, Holmburg L. Arm morbidity after sector resection and axillary dissection with or without postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer stage 1: results from a randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33;193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Helyer LK, Varnic M, Le LW, Leong W, McCready D. Obesity is a risk factor for developing postoperative lymphoedema in breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2010;16(1):48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herd-Smith A, Russo A, Muraca MG, Del Turco MR, Cardona G. Prognostic factors for lymphoedema after primary treatment of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92(7):1783–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soran A, D’Angelo G, Begovic M, Ardic F, Harlak A, Samuel Wieand H, et al. Breast cancer-related lymphoedema—what are the significant predictors and how they affect the severity of lymphoedema? Breast J. 2006;12(6):536–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aitken R, Gayes M, Rodger A, Chattey U, Forrest A. Arm morbidity within a trial of mastectomy and either node sample with selective radiotherapy or axillary clearance. BJS. 1989;76:568–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GK, Scott-Conner C. The risk of developing arm lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1959–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Villarini A, Pasanisi P, Raimondi M, Gargano G, Bruno E, Morelli D, et al. Preventing weight gain during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a dietary intervention study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:581–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sestak I, Harvie M, Howell A, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cuzick J. Weight change associated with Anastrozole and tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with or at high risk of developing breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:727–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kopec JA, Colangelo LH, Land SR, Julian TB, Brown AM, Anderson SJ, et al. Relationship between arm morbidity and patient-reported outcomes following surgery in women with node-negative breast cancer: NSABP protocol B-32. J Support Oncol. 2013;11(1):22–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Funded by Grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 1046018, 512378, 1037786), the National Breast Cancer Foundation, the Australian Department of Health and Ageing, MBF Australia, and the Scottwood Trust, New Zealand. Rhana Pike, from the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, assisted with the manuscript. Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, the National Breast Cancer Foundation, the Australian Department of Health and Ageing, MBF Australia, and the Scottwood Trust.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Grantley Gill MB BS, MD, FRACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wetzig, N., Gill, P.G., Espinoza, D. et al. Sentinel-Lymph-Node-Based Management or Routine Axillary Clearance? Five-Year Outcomes of the RACS Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Axillary Clearance (SNAC) 1 Trial: Assessment and Incidence of True Lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1064–1070 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5669-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5669-2

Keywords

Navigation