Abstract
Background
Medullary breast cancer (MBC) is a rare tumor associated with a better prognosis compared with other breast cancers. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has not been extensively studied.
Methods
Female patients with invasive MBC reported to the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2012 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and treatment were studied using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model. Patients who had node-negative (N0), non-metastatic (M0) tumors 10 to 50 mm in size (T1cN0M0 and T2N0M0) treated with and without chemotherapy were analyzed using propensity score matching.
Results
Of 3739 patients with MBC, 2642 (71%) had T1b-T2N0M0 disease treated with and without chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed that for all MBC patients, the significant predictors of OS were age older than 65 years, one or more comorbidities, tumor larger than 2 cm, positive nodes, distant metastasis, and treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients with T1cN0M0 and T2N0M0 had improved OS if they received chemotherapy (p < 0.0005). Patients with T1bN0M0 who received chemotherapy did not show better OS than those who did not. Patients with T1c-T2N0M0 were then matched by propensity score based on age, presence of comorbidities, tumor size, and treatment methods used. After matching, the group receiving chemotherapy showed an improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.62; p < 0.0005) compared to the group that did not receive chemotherapy.
Conclusions
For patients with T1c-T2N0M0 MBC, chemotherapy significantly improves OS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ridolfi RL. Medullary carcinoma of the breast. Cancer. 1977;40:1365–85.
Pedersen L, Zedeler K, Holck S, Schiodt T, Mouridsen HT. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: prevalence and prognostic importance of classical risk factors in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:2289–95.
Chu Z, Lin H, Liang X, Huang R, Zhan Q, Jiang J, Zhou X. Clinicopathologic characteristics of typical medullary breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 117 cases. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111493.
Huober J, Gelber S, Goldhirsch A, et al. Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2843–51.
Jensen ML, Kiaer H, Andersen J, Jensen V, Melsen F. Prognostic comparison of three classifications for medullary carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology. 1997;30:523–32.
Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4636–44.
Martinez SR, Beal SH, Canter RJ, Chen SL, Khatri VP, Bold RJ. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based perspective. Med Oncol. 2011;28:738–44.
Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR: Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:1046–52.
Fourquet A, Vilcoq JR, Zafrani B, et al: Medullary breast carcinoma: the role of radiotherapy as primary treatment. Radiother Oncol. 1987;10:1–6.
Park I, Kim J, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the characteristics of medullary breast carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:417–25.
Vu-Nishino H, Tavassoli FA, Ahrens WA, Haffty BG. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of patients with medullary breast carcinoma managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Radiat Oncol Biol. 2005;62:1040–7.
Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.
Mateo AM, Pezzi TA, Sundermeyer M, Kelley CA, Klimberg VS, Pezzi CM. Atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast has similar prognostic factors and survival to typical medullary breast carcinoma: 3976 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(5):533–36. doi:10.1002/jso.24367.
Lim S, Park SH, Park HK, Hur MH, Oh SJ, Suh YJ. Prognostic role of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative (N0), triple-negative (TN), medullary breast cancer (MBC) in the Korean population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0140208. doi:10.137/journal.pone.0140208.
Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, et al. Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2966–73.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer, Version 2, 2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Retrieved 10 June 2016 at http://www.nccn.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Alina M. Mateo and Todd A. Pezzi contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mateo, A.M., Pezzi, T.A., Sundermeyer, M. et al. Chemotherapy Significantly Improves Survival for Patients with T1c-T2N0M0 Medullary Breast Cancer: 3739 Cases From the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1050–1056 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5649-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5649-6