Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Postoperative Chemotherapy After Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Isolated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Study

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The prognosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer has been improved with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, benefits of postoperative chemotherapy (CT) are unclear.

Methods

This retrospective, multicenter study included 231 patients treated by CRS and HIPEC for isolated PC of colon cancer in four expert’s centers. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and peritoneal recurrence-free survival (PRFS) were compared between patients with adjuvant CT (started within 3 months after surgery) and patients with surveillance only.

Results

After exclusion of 10 patients for early postoperative death (4 %), 221 patients were included (CT group: n = 151; surveillance group: n = 70). Main postoperative CT regimens (median of 6 cycles) were Folfox (28 %), Folfiri bevacizumab (24.5 %), Folfiri (16 %), and Folfiri cetuximab (12.5 %). The median OS after surgery was 43.3 months with no difference between CT and surveillance groups. In multivariate analysis, a low peritoneal cancer index (p < 0.0001) and a long delay between diagnosis of CP and HIPEC (p = 0.001) were associated with increased OS. The median PFS and PRFS were 12.4 and 17 months, respectively. At 1 year, more patients were without progression (p = 0.001) or PC recurrence (0.0004) in the CT group, but with prolonged follow-up this difference was no longer significant.

Conclusions

Early postoperative CT does not improve OS after CRS and HIPEC for colon carcinomatosis. However, a transient effect on PFS and PRFS was observed. A subgroup of patients who may benefit more from CT remain to be defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:765–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu DZ, Lang NP, Thompson C, Osteen PK, Westbrook KC. Peritioneal carcinomatosis in nongynecologic malignancy. A prospective study of prognostic factors. Cancer. 1989;63:364–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadeghi B, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies. Cancer. 2000;88:358–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayne DG, Fook S, Loi C, Seow-Choen F. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1545–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelz JO, et al. Evaluation of best supportive care and systemic chemotherapy as treatment stratified according to the retrospective peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDSS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:689.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugarbaker PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Ann. Surg. 1995;221:29–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugarbaker PH, et al. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy to surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal cancer: phgroupacological studies. Cancer Res. 1990;50:5790–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verwaal VJ, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elias D, et al. Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glehen O, et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3284–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elias D, et al. Prognostic similarities and differences in optimally resected liver metastases and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancers. Ann Surg. 2015;261:157–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Passot G, et al. Progression following neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy may not be a contraindication to a curative approach for colorectal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg. 2012;256:125–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumgartner JM et al. (2014) Predictors of progression in high-grade appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chua TC, et al. Influence of modern systemic therapies as adjunct to cytoreduction and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1560–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitry E, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4906–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nordlinger B et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;371:1007–1016.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Allegra CJ, et al. Phase III Trial assessing bevacizumab in stages II and III carcinoma of the colon: results of NSABP Protocol C-08. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:11–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Gramont A, et al. Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taieb J, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage III colon cancer (PETACC-8): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:862–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Passot G et al. (2014) Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a new prognosis tool for the curative management of peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Isabelle Bonnefoy for all the help provided during the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest of any kind for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Gornet MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maillet, M., Glehen, O., Lambert, J. et al. Early Postoperative Chemotherapy After Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Isolated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 863–869 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4914-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4914-4

Keywords

Navigation