Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DNA Hypermethylation of SHISA3 in Colorectal Cancer: An Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis

  • Translational Research and Biomarkers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Shisa3 is a novel tumor suppressor identified in lung cancer. However, its antitumor activity in other human cancers and the mechanism of gene inactivation remain unknown.

Methods

SHISA3 expression was measured by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). DNA methylation was determined by bisulfite sequencing and pyrosequencing.

Results

Down-regulation of SHISA3 expression was observed in all of 11 colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and was further confirmed in 34 (65.4 %) of 52 colorectal carcinomas by RT-qPCR. Four of six CRC cell lines could restore SHISA3 expression after treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Tumor-specific methylation of five CpG sites in the first intron of SHISA3 was identified by bisulfite sequencing, and their methylation levels were quantified in 127 pairs of primary CRC tissues by bisulfite pyrosequencing. The methylation levels of SHISA3 in tumors were noticeably higher than that in their matched normal mucosae. In addition, SHISA3 hypermethylation was significantly associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage II and III disease (P = 0.007) and was an independent predictor of poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5–5.8; P = 0.002] and disease-free survival (HR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.6–10.2; P = 0.003) of CRC patients.

Conclusions

SHISA3 gene is epigenetically inactivated in a substantial fraction of CRC, and its hypermethylation is of prognostic significance in predicting clinical outcome. The quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing assay established could be a cost-effective tool for providing a potential biomarker of adverse prognosis in CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Markowitz SD, Bertagnolli MM. Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2449–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. van Engeland M, Derks S, Smits KM, Meijer GA, Herman JG. Colorectal cancer epigenetics: complex simplicity. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1382–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perea J, Lomas M, Hidalgo M. Molecular basis of colorrectal cancer: towards an individualized management? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duffy MJ, O’Donovan N, Crown J. Use of molecular markers for predicting therapy response in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:151–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Furushima K, Yamamoto A, Nagano T, et al. Mouse homologues of Shisa antagonistic to Wnt and Fgf signalings. Dev Biol. 2007;306:480–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pei J, Grishin NV. Unexpected diversity in Shisa-like proteins suggests the importance of their roles as transmembrane adaptors. Cell Signal. 2012;24:758–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto A, Nagano T, Takehara S, Hibi M, Aizawa S. Shisa promotes head formation through the inhibition of receptor protein maturation for the caudalizing factors, Wnt and FGF. Cell. 2005;120:223–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katoh Y, Katoh M. Comparative genomics on Shisa orthologs. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16:181–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva AC, Filipe M, Vitorino M, Steinbeisser H, Belo JA. Developmental expression of Shisa-2 in Xenopus laevis. Int J Dev Biol. 2006;50:575–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Filipe M, Goncalves L, Bento M, Silva AC, Belo JA. Comparative expression of mouse and chicken Shisa homologues during early development. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2567–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hedge TA, Mason I. Expression of Shisa2, a modulator of both Wnt and Fgf signaling, in the chick embryo. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:81–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Y, Tsuchida A, Yamamoto A, et al. Expression and roles of a xenopus head-forming gene homologue in human cancer cell lines. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2008;70:73–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CC, Chen HY, Su KY, et al. SHISA3 Is Associated with Prolonged Survival through Promoting beta-Catenin Degradation in Lung Cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:433–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai MH, Fang WH, Lin SW, Yen SJ, Chou SJ, Yang YC. Mitochondrial genomic instability in colorectal cancer: no correlation to nuclear microsatellite instability and allelic deletion of hMSH2, hMLH1, and p53 genes, but prediction of better survival for Dukes’ stage C disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2918–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tzeng ST, Tsai MH, Chen CL, et al. NDST4 is a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene at chromosome 4q26 and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis in colorectal cancer. Plos One. 2013;8:e67040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li LC, Dahiya R. MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1427–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Knudson AG, Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68:820–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fevr T, Robine S, Louvard D, Huelsken J. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7551–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim BM, Mao J, Taketo MM, Shivdasani RA. Phases of canonical Wnt signaling during the development of mouse intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:529–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reya T, Clevers H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature. 2005;434:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Humphries A, Wright NA. Colonic crypt organization and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:415–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones PA. DNA methylation errors and cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2463–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:415–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo Y, Wong CJ, Kaz AM, et al. Differences in DNA methylation signatures reveal multiple pathways of progression from adenoma to colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:418–29 e8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Toyota M, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotypes in aging and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999;9:349–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8681–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Grady WM, Carethers JM. Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1079–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrison S, Benziger H. The molecular biology of colorectal carcinoma and its implications: a review. Surgeon. 2011;9:200–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:489–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jao TM, Tsai MH, Lio HY, et al. Protocadherin 10 suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135:2593–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by Grants from the National Science Council, Executive Yuan (NSC 102-2320-B-002-017), the Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH-102-1-2A02) and the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX103-10136BI), Taiwan.

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-Chien Yang PhD.

Additional information

Ming-Hong Tsai and Wen-Chi Chen contributed equally to this study and share co-first authorship.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 969 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 214 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, MH., Chen, WC., Yu, SL. et al. DNA Hypermethylation of SHISA3 in Colorectal Cancer: An Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 22 (Suppl 3), 1481–1489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4593-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4593-1

Keywords

Navigation