Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Colorectal-Cancer: Do Radiologists Agree?

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) at staging computed tomography (CT) for colorectal cancer (CRC), and the optimal diagnostic approach, are debated. This study aimed to analyse variability in radiologists’ detection of IPN at staging CT for CRC.

Methods

All patients with CRC referred to our center between 2006 and 2011 were included. Primary staging CT scans were re-evaluated by an experienced thoracic radiologist whose findings were entered into a dedicated database and merged with data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, the National Patient Registry, the Danish Pathology Registry, and the primary CT evaluation. Inter-reader agreement was calculated by Kappa statistics, and associations between variables and malignancy of pulmonary nodules were analyzed with χ 2 and Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounding variables.

Results

In total, 841 patients were included. The primary CT assessment reported IPN in 9.8 % of patients and pulmonary metastases in 5.1 % of patients compared with 5.6 and 7.0 %, respectively, reported by the experienced thoracic radiologist. Kappa for agreement between the primary assessor and the thoracic radiologist on IPN was 0.31 and 0.65 for pulmonary metastases. Synchronous liver metastases were predictive of malignancy of IPN (adjusted odds ratio 20.1; 95 % confidence interval 2.64–437.66; p = 0.012), whereas no other investigated radiological characteristics or clinicopathological factors were significantly associated with malignancy of IPN.

Conclusion

The characterization of pulmonary findings on staging CT for CRC varied greatly between the radiologists, and double-reading of scans with IPN is recommended prior to further diagnostic work-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. 2010. http://dccg.dk/03_Publikation/Retningslinier2009revOKT2010.pdf [in Danish]. Accessed 3 Mar 2014.

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, rectal cancer. 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2013.

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, colon cancer. 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2013.

  4. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. 2007. http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/content/uploads/2007-CC-Management-Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2013.

  5. McIntosh J, Sylvester PA, Virjee J, Callaway M, Thomas MG. Pulmonary staging in colorectal cancer: is computerised tomography the answer? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:331–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordholm-Carstensen A, Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Wille-Jorgensen PA, Harling H, on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer G. Occurrence and survival of synchronous pulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:447–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordholm-Carstensen A, Wille-Jorgensen PA, Jorgensen LN, Harling H. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules at colorectal cancer staging: a systematic review of predictive parameters for malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4022–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Armato SG, Roberts RY, Kocherginsky M, et al. Assessment of radiologist performance in the detection of lung nodules: dependence on the definition of “truth”. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:28–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Austin JH, Muller NL, Friedman PJ, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 1996;200:327–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.2 ed. 2008.

  13. Gamer ML, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh, P. irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. 2012.

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, et al. (eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2003. Bethesda; National Cancer Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ, et al. Short-term health-related quality of life consequences in a lung cancer CT screening trial (NELSON). Br J Cancer. 2010;102:27–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol. 1991;10:259–267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomez D, Kamali D, Dunn WK, Beckingham IJ, Brooks A, Cameron IC. Outcomes in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14:448–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S. Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:14–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maithel SK, Ginsberg MS, D’Amico F, et al. Natural history of patients with subcentimeter pulmonary nodules undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeon KN, Goo JM, Lee CH, et al. Computer-aided nodule detection and volumetry to reduce variability between radiologists in the interpretation of lung nodules at low-dose screening computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:457–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brent A, Talbot R, Coyne J, Nash G. Should indeterminate lung lesions reported on staging CT scans influence the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:816–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips N, Bhan C, Murphy J, Behar N, Allen C, Rowe PH. Indeterminate lung lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: do they progress [abstract]? Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A-517.

  24. Choi DJ, Kwak JM, Kim J, Woo SU, Kim SH. Preoperative chest computerized tomography in patients with locally advanced mid or lower rectal cancer: its role in staging and impact on treatment strategy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:588–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Christoffersen MW, Bulut O, Jess P. The diagnostic value of indeterminate lung lesions on staging chest computed tomographies in patients with colorectal cancer. Dan Med Bull. 2010;57:A4093.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Quyn AJ, Matthews A, Daniel T, Amin AI, Yalamarthi S. The clinical significance of radiologically detected indeterminate pulmonary nodules in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:828–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Maretto I, et al. Significance of pulmonary nodules in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1680–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Varol Y, Varol U, Karaca B, Karabulut B, Sezgin C, Uslu R. The frequency and significance of radiologically detected indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with colorectal cancer. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21:457–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Griffiths SN, Shaikh I, Tam E, Wegstapel H. Characterisation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in colorectal cancer. Int J Surg. 2012;10:575–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. Radiology. 2004;231:305–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hodnett PA, Ko JP. Evaluation and management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin N Am. 2012;50:895–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J, et al. Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:214–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:910–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ET, et al. Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:69–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tie J, Lipton L, Desai J, et al. KRAS mutation is associated with lung metastasis in patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1122–1130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Furman AM, Dit Yafawi JZ, Soubani AO. An update on the evaluation and management of small pulmonary nodules. Future Oncol. 2013;9:855–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lacasse Y, Wong E, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of localised pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 1999;54:884–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research nurse Tina Brondum extracted data from all scan reports, and Steffen Høgskilde extracted data from the DCCG, the DPR, and the NPR. Funding was received from the Danish Cancer Society, The Gangsted Foundation, The Bispebjerg Hospital Research Foundation, The A.P. Møller Foundation, the Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation, the Einar Willumsen Memorial Fund, and the Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborg Foundation.

Conflict of interest

Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen, Lars N. Jorgensen, Peer A. Wille-Jørgensen, Hanne Hansen, and Henrik Harling have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen MD.

Additional information

On behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nordholm-Carstensen, A., Jorgensen, L.N., Wille-Jørgensen, P.A. et al. Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Colorectal-Cancer: Do Radiologists Agree?. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 543–549 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4063-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4063-1

Keywords

Navigation