Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Associated with Higher Risk of Complications After Adrenal Surgery

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgeon experience has been demonstrated to result in better outcomes after a variety of advanced operations. Less information is available regarding adrenal surgery. We compared the outcomes after adrenalectomy for a variety of indications and determined the effect of surgeon’s case volume.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis was performed using ICD-9 procedure codes included in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2009 to identify all adult patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral adrenalectomy for benign or malignant conditions. Logistic regression was used to test for interaction between surgeon case volume (low = 1, intermediate = 2–5, and high = >5 adrenalectomies per year), diagnosis, type of operation performed, and risk of complications.

Results

A total of 7,829 adrenalectomies were included. Risk of complications after bilateral adrenalectomy was 23.4 % compared to 15.0 % for unilateral adrenalectomy (odds ratio 2.165, 95 % confidence interval 1.335, 3.512). Malignancy was associated with higher risk of complication (23.1 %) than benign disease (13.2 %) (odds ratio 1.685, 95 % confidence interval 1.371, 2.072). Complication rates for low- and intermediate-volume surgeons were 18.8 and 14.6 %, respectively, and both were significantly higher than complications by high-volume surgeons (11.6 %, p < 0.05). Length of stay and charges were both significantly less for high-volume surgeons compared to lower-volume groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Low surgeon case volumes and adrenal surgery for malignant or bilateral disease are associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. Length of stay and charges were significantly less when high-volume surgeons perform adrenal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saunders BD, Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR, Doherty GM, Gauger PG. Trends in utilization of adrenalectomy in the United States: have indications changed? World J Surg. 2004;28:1169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abecassis M, McLoughlin MJ, Langer B, Kudlow JE. Serendipitous adrenal masses: prevalence, significance, and management. Am J Surg. 1985;149:783–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29:298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW. The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1163–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunders BD, Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Doherty GM, Upchurch GR, Gauger PG. Who performs endocrine operations in the United States? Surgery. 2003;134:924–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Zeiger MA, Gordon TA, Udelsman R. Parathyroidectomy in Maryland: effects of an endocrine center. Surgery. 1996;120:948–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zelen J, Bilfinger TV, Anagnostopoulos CE. Coronary artery bypass grafting: the relationship of surgical volume, hospital location, and outcome. NY State J Med. 1991;91:290–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Stanley JC, Henke PK, Pronovost PJ, Upchurch GR Jr. Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:739–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3 years summary. Surgery. 2003;134:613–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Zainabadi K, Wilson SE. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240:586–94.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2003;237:509–14.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228:429–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Casson AG, Van Lanschot JJ. Improving outcomes after esophagectomy: the impact of operative volume. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:262–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang T. Endocrine surgery. Am J Surg. 2011;202:369–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg. 2009;144:1060–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. HCUP Databases. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. 2014. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.

  18. Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery. 2007;142:887–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallagher SF, Wahi M, Haines KL, et al. Trends in adrenalectomy rates, indications, and physician volume: A statewide analysis of 1816 adrenalectomies. Surgery. 2007;142:1011–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harness JK, Organ CH Jr, Thompson NW. Operative experience of US general surgery residents with diseases of the adrenal glands, endocrine pancreas, and other less common endocrine organs. World J Surg. 1996;20:885–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Le D, Karmali S, Harness JK, Sheppard BC. An update: the operative experience in adrenal, pancreatic, and other less common endocrine diseases of US general surgery residents. World J Surg. 2008;32:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quan H, Li B, Saunders LD, et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:1424–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Hauch MD, MBA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauch, A., Al-Qurayshi, Z. & Kandil, E. Factors Associated with Higher Risk of Complications After Adrenal Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 103–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3750-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3750-2

Keywords

Navigation